You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: In GD: P [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. In GD: P
:-)

Look at Waterman's posts for that as well. He leaves me in the dust

But also this is the historian in me speaking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -All of these parallels drawn between Obama and JFK are ludicrous. Writer  May-19-08 11:48 AM   #0 
  - Blame JFK's daughter if you must: "A President Like My Father"  Pirate Smile   May-19-08 11:53 AM   #1 
  - Okay, then, I will.  Writer   May-19-08 11:56 AM   #2 
     - Im glad you knew her father better than her or his own brother Teddy  DJ13   May-19-08 11:57 AM   #6 
        - Seriously, now, do we HAVE to know her father?  Writer   May-19-08 12:00 PM   #10 
        - ZING!  hokies4ever   May-19-08 12:00 PM   #11 
  - I wouldn't say we need to go back to the 60's.  newmajority   May-19-08 11:56 AM   #3 
  - Yes, this is the liberal political swing following the conservative political era started in 1980.  Writer   May-19-08 11:57 AM   #5 
  - Lesser men are compared to Great Men  Jake3463   May-19-08 11:56 AM   #4 
  - $100 says that the dreaming part is marketing.  Writer   May-19-08 11:58 AM   #7 
     - Kennedy  Jake3463   May-19-08 12:02 PM   #15 
  - Obama qualifies on his own, but there is no ignoring that he evokes....  PoliticalAmazon   May-19-08 11:59 AM   #8 
  - Many blacks might say (especially older ones)  hokies4ever   May-19-08 11:59 AM   #9 
  - A very sad but true statement  muryan   May-19-08 12:05 PM   #17 
  - Not if you count Jesse Jackson  hokies4ever   May-19-08 12:09 PM   #19 
  - Oh for crying out loud!  dbaker41   May-19-08 04:41 PM   #51 
  - if people want to make the comparison, so what?? what difference does it make?  LSK   May-19-08 12:01 PM   #12 
  - Because it seems incongruent to both herald Obama as a figure of change...  Writer   May-19-08 12:04 PM   #16 
     - the 60s were a period of change  LSK   May-19-08 12:12 PM   #20 
        - Because the same people adopting change, for the most part, abandoned it for Volvos in the 1980's.  Writer   May-19-08 12:14 PM   #21 
           - because they accomplished what they wanted by the 80s???  LSK   May-19-08 12:18 PM   #22 
           - No. Because they suddenly decided that the rabid pursuit of capital transcended the needs of the...  Writer   May-19-08 12:19 PM   #23 
              - so the Vietnam war did not end?????  LSK   May-19-08 12:23 PM   #24 
              - Say wha'? They were only there because of the war?  Writer   May-19-08 12:30 PM   #26 
              - "the rabid pursuit of capital"... Methinks someone read the Cliff Notes of Marx, and likes to pose.  apocalypsehow   May-19-08 01:23 PM   #36 
           - No we didn't. We are the same people we were then.  jaxx   May-19-08 01:17 PM   #35 
           - I've got to ask: Do you think you all invented anti-war protests?  Writer   May-19-08 03:32 PM   #47 
              - Nope. But we were good at it.  jaxx   May-19-08 04:58 PM   #53 
                 - Well... at least you all WENT INTO THE F'ING STREETS.  Writer   May-19-08 05:03 PM   #55 
                    - People have taken to the streets  nadinbrzezinski   May-19-08 05:18 PM   #58 
           - You lost me at this post Writer. Many of us are still working towards what we were then.  uppityperson   May-19-08 02:04 PM   #39 
              - And there lies the problem, the corporate media has corrupted many things  nadinbrzezinski   May-19-08 05:21 PM   #61 
  - "All of these parallels?" Are you writing from January?  Occam Bandage   May-19-08 12:02 PM   #13 
  - Youre right. He reminds me more of RFK than JFK.  The Ghost   May-19-08 12:02 PM   #14 
  - We certainly didn't get to know what kind of president he would be.  Writer   May-19-08 12:08 PM   #18 
     - That is very true. He encouraged positiveness, and hope, but we will never know  uppityperson   May-19-08 02:06 PM   #41 
        - Completely.  Writer   May-19-08 03:30 PM   #46 
           - As someone in the over 50 set, I resent to worshipping of JFK.  uppityperson   May-19-08 04:10 PM   #50 
  - As an Obama supporter I fully agree  GoPsUx   May-19-08 12:27 PM   #25 
  - Little do a few of the folks in this thread understand that I'm actually DEFENDING Obama.  Writer   May-19-08 12:31 PM   #27 
     - I like that you are posing an actual well reasoned point  GoPsUx   May-19-08 12:34 PM   #28 
        - Thanks, dude.  Writer   May-19-08 12:36 PM   #29 
  - He is his own person, but.... you knew that was coming  nadinbrzezinski   May-19-08 12:36 PM   #30 
  - I salivate at your well-reasoned analysis.  Writer   May-19-08 12:38 PM   #32 
     - In GD: P  nadinbrzezinski   May-19-08 12:43 PM   #33 
        - Well your point is salient: Every politician has characteristics that ...  Writer   May-19-08 12:54 PM   #34 
           - Every analogy falls apart at some point...  sakura   May-19-08 01:56 PM   #38 
           - My dad was from the silent generation.  Writer   May-19-08 03:28 PM   #44 
              - My parents are of that generation, too...  sakura   May-19-08 09:09 PM   #63 
           - History never repeats itself 100% EVAH  nadinbrzezinski   May-19-08 02:05 PM   #40 
              - I'm not a historian, but I've had similar thoughts.  Writer   May-19-08 03:21 PM   #43 
                 - Where they are similar is that both Jack and Obama  nadinbrzezinski   May-19-08 04:50 PM   #52 
                    - That's what i've thought, too. That JFK was a martyr because of his ephemeral presidency.  Writer   May-19-08 04:59 PM   #54 
                       - All cynicism aside it IS a movement  nadinbrzezinski   May-19-08 05:12 PM   #56 
  - "no more than two and a half years"  hfojvt   May-19-08 12:36 PM   #31 
  - Actually, presidential historians disagree with you, namely  sfexpat2000   May-19-08 01:32 PM   #37 
  - JFK was our first and so far our only President from a minority group.  hedgehog   May-19-08 02:09 PM   #42 
  - rev  soaplover20012001   May-19-08 03:28 PM   #45 
     - see below  hedgehog   May-19-08 03:35 PM   #48 
        - Let me translate.  ieoeja   May-19-08 03:41 PM   #49 
  - Ludicrous to you ... Others are entitled to their opinion of that comparison.  AtomicKitten   May-19-08 05:17 PM   #57 
  - Yeah... but I don't think the comparison holds a lot of water.  Writer   May-19-08 05:19 PM   #59 
     - there you go  AtomicKitten   May-19-08 05:25 PM   #62 
  - I agree. JFK had advantages that Obama never enjoyed.  Yanez Houston Jordan   May-19-08 05:20 PM   #60 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC