|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
TheDoorbellRang
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-05-08 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. They need to be punished. Not rewarded |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
tkmorris | May-05-08 03:44 AM | #0 |
One problem... |
ColbertWatcher | May-05-08 03:56 AM | #1 |
I agree, Thats why I don't think they should be seated at all, |
napi21 | May-05-08 04:13 AM | #3 |
I don't think I agree |
tkmorris | May-05-08 04:17 AM | #6 |
I think the delegates should be divided |
Raine | May-05-08 04:06 AM | #2 |
How about with the caveat that we burn down their hometowns! |
JVS | May-05-08 04:14 AM | #4 |
Delegates aren't bound either |
sandnsea | May-05-08 04:16 AM | #5 |
If we had made SC superdelegates would you of gone for that . My guess no. |
barack the house | May-05-08 07:13 AM | #7 |
No! First, exclude ALL of their superdelegates from voting on anything. |
TexasObserver | May-05-08 08:18 AM | #8 |
They need to be punished. Not rewarded |
TheDoorbellRang | May-05-08 08:55 AM | #9 |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC