MaineDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message |
| 45. Too bad there is no way to tally popular vote |
|
Any number given is totally bogus. There is no possible way to get an accurate popular vote total.
|
| -the popular vote tallied. Looking good for HRC...... |
BenDavid |
May-03-08 01:19 AM |
#0 |
-
What numbers are you looking at? |
Secret_Society |
May-03-08 01:21 AM |
#1 |
 -
They're false by any method, and in any case, there's no proper method. |
BullGooseLoony |
May-03-08 01:26 AM |
#7 |
  -
If my mother had four legs she could win the Kentucky Derby |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
May-03-08 01:49 AM |
#18 |
 -
popular vote is a canard |
swampg8r |
May-03-08 10:45 AM |
#70 |
-
We are not allowed to talk about that here. Obama Underground and all. |
goldcanyonaz |
May-03-08 01:22 AM |
#2 |
 -
There's More Obama Supporters |
otohara |
May-03-08 01:28 AM |
#8 |
  -
Yes there are more Obama supporters here |
Seeker30 |
May-03-08 07:34 AM |
#41 |
   -
Clearly you're not one of those |
shadowknows69 |
May-03-08 07:36 AM |
#42 |
   -
That Wasn't Very Nice |
otohara |
May-03-08 10:35 AM |
#68 |
  -
What about the ones who have no candidate? |
dogday |
May-03-08 09:53 AM |
#57 |
 -
We are not allowed to talk about made up facts? |
datopbanana |
May-03-08 02:21 AM |
#24 |
 -
You poor, poor victim. |
Forkboy |
May-03-08 02:56 AM |
#26 |
 -
among some of the most informed Democratic voters (DU) Obama is well ahead |
CreekDog |
May-03-08 05:06 AM |
#37 |
-
Too bad for her that we're counting delegates and not popular votes. |
baldguy |
May-03-08 01:24 AM |
#3 |
 -
We aren't counting delegates unless we hit 2024. Otherwise, all bets are off. NT |
MADem |
May-03-08 01:38 AM |
#11 |
  -
You would disenfranchise people who live in caucus states? |
baldguy |
May-03-08 01:52 AM |
#20 |
   -
who said that? the rules say you have to reach a certain # of delegates, not just 'be ahead.' sorry |
VotesForWomen |
May-03-08 03:15 AM |
#27 |
  -
Amazing how they feel free to make up the rules as the go along, isn't it? |
MADem |
May-03-08 12:15 PM |
#72 |
  -
That's what these 'popular vote' arguments do. |
tofunut |
May-03-08 12:27 PM |
#74 |
  -
that's it exactly. |
aquarius dawning |
May-03-08 05:03 AM |
#36 |
  -
yup--that magic number |
rodeodance |
May-03-08 06:30 AM |
#38 |
 -
Actually that is not true. "By ANY measure, Obama keeps telling the delegates" |
Evergreen Emerald |
May-03-08 07:48 AM |
#46 |
-
What states has Clinton won that don't generally Democratic in the general election? |
baldguy |
May-03-08 09:43 AM |
#54 |
-
LIER! Obama has a 48-state Strategery! |
Pigwidgeon |
May-03-08 09:50 AM |
#56 |
-
Hillary apparently has a 36½ state strategy |
baldguy |
May-03-08 12:31 PM |
#76 |
-
You Think After 2000 When Gore Had |
otohara |
May-03-08 01:24 AM |
#4 |
 -
Because most of us recognize Gore actually won in 2000... |
LVjinx |
May-03-08 04:19 AM |
#28 |
  -
Absurd |
otohara |
May-03-08 10:40 AM |
#69 |
 -
Nader took more than 97,000 votes in Florida in '00; that's not going to happen this time |
PurityOfEssence |
May-03-08 10:27 AM |
#66 |
-
(1) You're numbers are wrong ... |
NanceGreggs |
May-03-08 01:25 AM |
#5 |
 -
the primaries are about choosing the candidate who has the |
paulk |
May-03-08 12:28 PM |
#75 |
-
My last Tarot card spread looked pretty good for her too. nt |
billyoc |
May-03-08 01:25 AM |
#6 |
-
your numbers do include Florida and Michigan, with no votes for Obama in Michigan |
virtualobserver |
May-03-08 01:31 AM |
#9 |
 -
Whadda ya gonna nitpick now? n/t |
NanceGreggs |
May-03-08 01:36 AM |
#10 |
 -
He didn't get any votes in Michigan |
MonkeyFunk |
May-03-08 02:42 AM |
#25 |
-
MF...Yor credibility is history. |
Blarch |
May-03-08 06:58 AM |
#39 |
 -
awww |
MonkeyFunk |
May-03-08 07:32 AM |
#40 |
-
how orwellian |
dcindian |
May-03-08 07:37 AM |
#43 |
-
LOL |
MonkeyFunk |
May-03-08 09:04 AM |
#50 |
-
The popular vote only has meaning if a superdelegate thinks its relevant |
onenote |
May-03-08 07:48 AM |
#47 |
-
yes |
swampg8r |
May-03-08 10:48 AM |
#71 |
-
another Obama fan lie |
MonkeyFunk |
May-03-08 12:46 PM |
#77 |
-
Despicable? |
philk17088 |
May-03-08 02:01 PM |
#79 |
-
Obama has the popular vote without FL + MI, or with FL but not MI |
Levgreee |
May-03-08 01:38 AM |
#12 |
 -
that is not the point. Obama keeps saying "by any measure" he is ahead |
Evergreen Emerald |
May-03-08 09:36 AM |
#51 |
-
Hey Ben...you BETTER GET READY for the thread-shits you are about to receive for this one!!!!@!@ |
TK421 |
May-03-08 01:38 AM |
#13 |
-
I guess you don't do numbers. |
Usrename |
May-03-08 01:42 AM |
#14 |
-
Great job not counting those caucus states |
hokies4ever |
May-03-08 01:42 AM |
#15 |
 -
Maine is a repub bastion dontcha' know... |
Veruca Salt |
May-03-08 01:04 PM |
#78 |
-
Your meds Ben. Your MEDS. You forgot'em again?!! |
DerekJ |
May-03-08 01:45 AM |
#16 |
-
How did you calculate the Caucus states?...........n/t |
DearAbby |
May-03-08 01:46 AM |
#17 |
-
Your Magic Eight Ball must be using Republican Rules |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
May-03-08 01:49 AM |
#19 |
-
The Establishment is terrified |
bluestateguy |
May-03-08 02:10 AM |
#21 |
 -
Which is why they're all endorsing him... Riight. Which candidate is the establishment candidate? |
LVjinx |
May-03-08 04:20 AM |
#29 |
-
no link to your numbers and no responses from you |
CreekDog |
May-03-08 02:12 AM |
#22 |
-
Another update from Opposite World.. |
Webster Green |
May-03-08 02:12 AM |
#23 |
-
Gee Whiz... |
pompano |
May-03-08 04:29 AM |
#30 |
-
they are both unelectable as long as Republican corporations count the votes . . . |
OneBlueSky |
May-03-08 04:30 AM |
#31 |
-
What's the value of the popular vote tally |
last_texas_dem |
May-03-08 04:33 AM |
#32 |
-
Meanwhile, this is what's happening on Planet Earth: |
CakeGrrl |
May-03-08 04:43 AM |
#33 |
 -
Yeah, I have seen that falsehood being paraded round |
dbmk |
May-03-08 04:47 AM |
#34 |
-
SDs disagree with you. |
cali |
May-03-08 04:47 AM |
#35 |
-
She also currently leads with the Super-delgate vote. Add in the SDs from FL and MI ... |
Maribelle |
May-03-08 07:44 AM |
#44 |
 -
why would you add the SDs from Michigan to her column? |
onenote |
May-03-08 07:59 AM |
#49 |
-
The Florida and Michigan superdelegates not being counted right now: |
Maribelle |
May-03-08 09:38 AM |
#53 |
-
Too bad there is no way to tally popular vote |
MaineDem |
May-03-08 07:46 AM |
#45 |
-
another OP that failed both reading and math. How does he/she use a computer? |
onenote |
May-03-08 07:51 AM |
#48 |
-
popular vote is meaningless |
bambino |
May-03-08 09:37 AM |
#52 |
 -
We sure found that out in 2000, didn't we? |
Pigwidgeon |
May-03-08 09:47 AM |
#55 |
-
yes we did |
bambino |
May-03-08 10:13 AM |
#59 |
-
FALSIFIED SPIN ! |
RBInMaine |
May-03-08 09:55 AM |
#58 |
-
There is no such think as popular vote in the primaries |
karynnj |
May-03-08 10:14 AM |
#60 |
-
How are caucus state vote totals calculated? |
jefferson_dem |
May-03-08 10:16 AM |
#61 |
-
BREAKING - Hillary Clinton Supports Straw Grasping as Olympic Event. |
BlueIdaho |
May-03-08 10:21 AM |
#62 |
 -
Too funny! |
Toucano |
May-03-08 02:05 PM |
#80 |
-
Here is a link to the popular vote tally....you are NOT telling the truth at all |
madfloridian |
May-03-08 10:22 AM |
#63 |
-
Turns out, though, convention delegates elect nominees. |
Old Crusoe |
May-03-08 10:23 AM |
#64 |
-
Cue the calliope! |
ResetButton |
May-03-08 10:24 AM |
#65 |
-
You better alert the MSM and all candidates. Their number do not show this.. |
Bensthename |
May-03-08 10:31 AM |
#67 |
-
I like how you use the most skewed numbers possible for Clinton. |
PseudoIntellect |
May-03-08 12:26 PM |
#73 |
-
When did this argument stop being a canard? |
Gore1FL |
May-03-08 02:43 PM |
#81 |
-
Where did you get those numbers? Source? Link?? |
TBF |
May-03-08 02:46 PM |
#82 |
-
The lead post is NOT factual! -Obama still leads by 501,466 popular votes- |
mikekohr |
May-03-08 03:02 PM |
#83 |