You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: I guess you don't do numbers. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. I guess you don't do numbers.
Why not just admit you are arithmetically challenged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -the popular vote tallied. Looking good for HRC...... BenDavid  May-03-08 01:19 AM   #0 
  - What numbers are you looking at?  Secret_Society   May-03-08 01:21 AM   #1 
  - They're false by any method, and in any case, there's no proper method.  BullGooseLoony   May-03-08 01:26 AM   #7 
  - If my mother had four legs she could win the Kentucky Derby  WillYourVoteBCounted   May-03-08 01:49 AM   #18 
  - popular vote is a canard  swampg8r   May-03-08 10:45 AM   #70 
  - We are not allowed to talk about that here. Obama Underground and all.  goldcanyonaz   May-03-08 01:22 AM   #2 
  - There's More Obama Supporters  otohara   May-03-08 01:28 AM   #8 
  - Yes there are more Obama supporters here  Seeker30   May-03-08 07:34 AM   #41 
  - Clearly you're not one of those  shadowknows69   May-03-08 07:36 AM   #42 
  - That Wasn't Very Nice  otohara   May-03-08 10:35 AM   #68 
  - What about the ones who have no candidate?  dogday   May-03-08 09:53 AM   #57 
  - We are not allowed to talk about made up facts?  datopbanana   May-03-08 02:21 AM   #24 
  - You poor, poor victim.  Forkboy   May-03-08 02:56 AM   #26 
  - among some of the most informed Democratic voters (DU) Obama is well ahead  CreekDog   May-03-08 05:06 AM   #37 
  - Too bad for her that we're counting delegates and not popular votes.  baldguy   May-03-08 01:24 AM   #3 
  - We aren't counting delegates unless we hit 2024. Otherwise, all bets are off. NT  MADem   May-03-08 01:38 AM   #11 
  - You would disenfranchise people who live in caucus states?  baldguy   May-03-08 01:52 AM   #20 
  - who said that? the rules say you have to reach a certain # of delegates, not just 'be ahead.' sorry  VotesForWomen   May-03-08 03:15 AM   #27 
     - Amazing how they feel free to make up the rules as the go along, isn't it?  MADem   May-03-08 12:15 PM   #72 
     - That's what these 'popular vote' arguments do.  tofunut   May-03-08 12:27 PM   #74 
  - that's it exactly.  aquarius dawning   May-03-08 05:03 AM   #36 
  - yup--that magic number  rodeodance   May-03-08 06:30 AM   #38 
  - Actually that is not true. "By ANY measure, Obama keeps telling the delegates"  Evergreen Emerald   May-03-08 07:48 AM   #46 
     - What states has Clinton won that don't generally Democratic in the general election?  baldguy   May-03-08 09:43 AM   #54 
        - LIER! Obama has a 48-state Strategery!  Pigwidgeon   May-03-08 09:50 AM   #56 
           - Hillary apparently has a 36 state strategy  baldguy   May-03-08 12:31 PM   #76 
  - You Think After 2000 When Gore Had  otohara   May-03-08 01:24 AM   #4 
  - Because most of us recognize Gore actually won in 2000...  LVjinx   May-03-08 04:19 AM   #28 
  - Absurd  otohara   May-03-08 10:40 AM   #69 
  - Nader took more than 97,000 votes in Florida in '00; that's not going to happen this time  PurityOfEssence   May-03-08 10:27 AM   #66 
  - (1) You're numbers are wrong ...  NanceGreggs   May-03-08 01:25 AM   #5 
  - the primaries are about choosing the candidate who has the  paulk   May-03-08 12:28 PM   #75 
  - My last Tarot card spread looked pretty good for her too. nt  billyoc   May-03-08 01:25 AM   #6 
  - your numbers do include Florida and Michigan, with no votes for Obama in Michigan  virtualobserver   May-03-08 01:31 AM   #9 
  - Whadda ya gonna nitpick now? n/t  NanceGreggs   May-03-08 01:36 AM   #10 
  - He didn't get any votes in Michigan  MonkeyFunk   May-03-08 02:42 AM   #25 
     - MF...Yor credibility is history.  Blarch   May-03-08 06:58 AM   #39 
     - awww  MonkeyFunk   May-03-08 07:32 AM   #40 
        - how orwellian  dcindian   May-03-08 07:37 AM   #43 
           - LOL  MonkeyFunk   May-03-08 09:04 AM   #50 
     - The popular vote only has meaning if a superdelegate thinks its relevant  onenote   May-03-08 07:48 AM   #47 
     - yes  swampg8r   May-03-08 10:48 AM   #71 
        - another Obama fan lie  MonkeyFunk   May-03-08 12:46 PM   #77 
           - Despicable?  philk17088   May-03-08 02:01 PM   #79 
  - Obama has the popular vote without FL + MI, or with FL but not MI  Levgreee   May-03-08 01:38 AM   #12 
  - that is not the point. Obama keeps saying "by any measure" he is ahead  Evergreen Emerald   May-03-08 09:36 AM   #51 
  - Hey Ben...you BETTER GET READY for the thread-shits you are about to receive for this one!!!!@!@  TK421   May-03-08 01:38 AM   #13 
  - I guess you don't do numbers.  Usrename   May-03-08 01:42 AM   #14 
  - Great job not counting those caucus states  hokies4ever   May-03-08 01:42 AM   #15 
  - Maine is a repub bastion dontcha' know...  Veruca Salt   May-03-08 01:04 PM   #78 
  - Your meds Ben. Your MEDS. You forgot'em again?!!  DerekJ   May-03-08 01:45 AM   #16 
  - How did you calculate the Caucus states?...........n/t  DearAbby   May-03-08 01:46 AM   #17 
  - Your Magic Eight Ball must be using Republican Rules  WillYourVoteBCounted   May-03-08 01:49 AM   #19 
  - The Establishment is terrified  bluestateguy   May-03-08 02:10 AM   #21 
  - Which is why they're all endorsing him... Riight. Which candidate is the establishment candidate?  LVjinx   May-03-08 04:20 AM   #29 
  - no link to your numbers and no responses from you  CreekDog   May-03-08 02:12 AM   #22 
  - Another update from Opposite World..  Webster Green   May-03-08 02:12 AM   #23 
  - Gee Whiz...  pompano   May-03-08 04:29 AM   #30 
  - they are both unelectable as long as Republican corporations count the votes . . .  OneBlueSky   May-03-08 04:30 AM   #31 
  - What's the value of the popular vote tally  last_texas_dem   May-03-08 04:33 AM   #32 
  - Meanwhile, this is what's happening on Planet Earth:  CakeGrrl   May-03-08 04:43 AM   #33 
  - Yeah, I have seen that falsehood being paraded round  dbmk   May-03-08 04:47 AM   #34 
  - SDs disagree with you.  cali   May-03-08 04:47 AM   #35 
  - She also currently leads with the Super-delgate vote. Add in the SDs from FL and MI ...  Maribelle   May-03-08 07:44 AM   #44 
  - why would you add the SDs from Michigan to her column?  onenote   May-03-08 07:59 AM   #49 
     - The Florida and Michigan superdelegates not being counted right now:  Maribelle   May-03-08 09:38 AM   #53 
  - Too bad there is no way to tally popular vote  MaineDem   May-03-08 07:46 AM   #45 
  - another OP that failed both reading and math. How does he/she use a computer?  onenote   May-03-08 07:51 AM   #48 
  - popular vote is meaningless  bambino   May-03-08 09:37 AM   #52 
  - We sure found that out in 2000, didn't we?  Pigwidgeon   May-03-08 09:47 AM   #55 
     - yes we did  bambino   May-03-08 10:13 AM   #59 
  - FALSIFIED SPIN !  RBInMaine   May-03-08 09:55 AM   #58 
  - There is no such think as popular vote in the primaries  karynnj   May-03-08 10:14 AM   #60 
  - How are caucus state vote totals calculated?  jefferson_dem   May-03-08 10:16 AM   #61 
  - BREAKING - Hillary Clinton Supports Straw Grasping as Olympic Event.  BlueIdaho   May-03-08 10:21 AM   #62 
  - Too funny!  Toucano   May-03-08 02:05 PM   #80 
  - Here is a link to the popular vote tally....you are NOT telling the truth at all  madfloridian   May-03-08 10:22 AM   #63 
  - Turns out, though, convention delegates elect nominees.  Old Crusoe   May-03-08 10:23 AM   #64 
  - Cue the calliope!  ResetButton   May-03-08 10:24 AM   #65 
  - You better alert the MSM and all candidates. Their number do not show this..  Bensthename   May-03-08 10:31 AM   #67 
  - I like how you use the most skewed numbers possible for Clinton.  PseudoIntellect   May-03-08 12:26 PM   #73 
  - When did this argument stop being a canard?  Gore1FL   May-03-08 02:43 PM   #81 
  - Where did you get those numbers? Source? Link??  TBF   May-03-08 02:46 PM   #82 
  - The lead post is NOT factual! -Obama still leads by 501,466 popular votes-  mikekohr   May-03-08 03:02 PM   #83 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC