BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-29-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message |
| 80. Because that D-Punjab memo worked out so well... |
| -If Obama Can't Attack Hillary's Soft White Underbelly (Outsourcing To India) He's Incompetent |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:00 PM |
#0 |
 -
I agree. HE NEEDS TO ATTACK HER! SHE'S SOO VULNERABLE! |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:00 PM |
#1 |
  -
Key word being ATTACK |
oneofthepeople |
Apr-29-08 08:29 AM |
#85 |
| -
When are you running? You make it sound so easy. How much do you charge for advising campaigns? |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:02 PM |
#2 |
| -
You don't think this would work? |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:03 PM |
#3 |
| -
Work to do what? He's on track to have won a majority of all the pledged delegates |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:53 PM |
#52 |
| -
I know enough about people and politics to see Hillary's soft white underbelly EXPOSED. |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:04 PM |
#4 |
| -
So why aren't you making the big bucks? Look, Obama has run a brilliant campaign, he's got |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:46 PM |
#48 |
| -
Time to do a Harry Truman on Hillary. |
tabasco |
Apr-28-08 10:04 PM |
#5 |
| -
I agree. No smears, just facts. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:05 PM |
#7 |
| -
BO can't oppose outsourcing without offending his corporate sponsors. n/t |
jody |
Apr-28-08 10:04 PM |
#6 |
| -
Hillary's been lying about it from day 1. It's time Obama called her on it. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:06 PM |
#8 |
| -
BO's advisers know a president cannot function without support of the corporatist party. n/t |
jody |
Apr-28-08 10:17 PM |
#17 |
| -
And HRC has that support in pocket? |
bhikkhu |
Apr-28-08 11:21 PM |
#69 |
| -
I did not say that. n/t |
jody |
Apr-29-08 07:57 AM |
#83 |
| -
Jesus... He Knows That She's Trying To Suck Him Into A Mud Fight... |
WillyT |
Apr-28-08 10:06 PM |
#9 |
| -
This isn't mud. He would attack with truth. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:07 PM |
#10 |
| -
Maybe you should write a letter to the editor and let them know. If you think it's important enough |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:55 PM |
#55 |
| -
exposing Hillary's soft-white underbelly isn't a mud-fight. It's simply calling attention |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:08 PM |
#11 |
| -
He's going to lose unless he drops this 'politics of hope' crapola. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:09 PM |
#12 |
| -
Politics of Hope can involve attacks. Just not smears. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:10 PM |
#13 |
| -
Same difference. He needs to destroy Clinton, completely |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:19 PM |
#19 |
| -
I agree with you. But he doesn't have to abandon the "Politics of Hope." |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:20 PM |
#22 |
| -
Voters don't give a shit about the politics of hope. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:21 PM |
#24 |
| -
Why? He's going to win the nomination anyway. Why go negative? So you feel better? |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:57 PM |
#57 |
| -
Exactly, if he's not willing to fight, people sense that. And now HILLARY has taken up that rhetoric |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:11 PM |
#14 |
| -
And Then Politics Will NEVER Change... And We Will Get What We Deserve... |
WillyT |
Apr-28-08 10:11 PM |
#15 |
| -
The essence of politics will never change. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:19 PM |
#18 |
| -
Hell yes they do |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 10:51 PM |
#51 |
| -
He doesn't need to. |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:11 PM |
#16 |
| -
then how do you propose he change the media narrative, dominate a news cycle? |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:20 PM |
#21 |
| -
I don't knopw that he needs to. |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:21 PM |
# |
| -
you mean 41% LOSES. Sorry, that's weak. And by the time the GE comes along-he's permanently |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:22 PM |
#26 |
| -
Not really |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:31 PM |
#39 |
| -
You are wasting you superior intellect here on DU. I bet there are a ton of POTUS candidates that |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:03 PM |
#61 |
| -
He's guaranteed to lose Indiana--too many white people |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:22 PM |
#27 |
| -
He doesn't need to. |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:58 PM |
#58 |
| -
He's in REAL danger of losing the nomination. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:20 PM |
#23 |
| -
No, Hillary still can't win. It's over. n/t |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:24 PM |
#30 |
| -
Sure she can win it. The remaining superdelegates can |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:26 PM |
#31 |
| -
"The remaining superdelegates can all vote for her." |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:29 PM |
#37 |
| -
No. If all 200 uncommitted Superdelegates vote for her, she's |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:32 PM |
#40 |
| -
If you rounded up a million $100 donations for Hill, she wouldn't be broke. Now get going! |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:13 PM |
#64 |
| -
you know, even IF/WHEN he gets nominated, he'll still be a milquetoast elitist |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:33 PM |
#42 |
| -
Ahh, well, everybody has an opinion. |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:14 PM |
#65 |
| -
Its stupid for him to think like that |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 10:53 PM |
#53 |
| -
Winning isn't resting. But going for the bait is stupid. And he's not stupid |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:15 PM |
#66 |
| -
Letting your guard down when you're ahead |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 11:33 PM |
#71 |
| -
Yet he's going to get the majority of pledged delegates on May 20th. And |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:47 PM |
#73 |
| -
It will be a Pyhrric victory |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 11:47 PM |
#72 |
| -
It isn't going to the convention. And he will never put her away. He will let her put herself away. |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:49 PM |
#74 |
| -
She is very much alive and kicking |
nebula |
Apr-29-08 12:16 AM |
#76 |
| -
You aren't suggest he "Wellstone" her are you? |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-29-08 12:25 AM |
#77 |
| -
Don't be ridiculous |
nebula |
Apr-29-08 12:48 AM |
#78 |
| -
His opponents have put this race into over drive |
nebula |
Apr-29-08 12:53 AM |
#79 |
| -
A 10 point loss is actually above his needed rate. |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:28 PM |
#34 |
| -
Superdelegates still exist. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:36 PM |
#44 |
| -
She would still need more than 60% of those |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:47 PM |
#49 |
| -
Well Hillary IS losing and she's broke. And she's looking vindictive and meanspirited. |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:17 PM |
#67 |
| -
All he needs to do is stick to the facts |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:20 PM |
#20 |
| -
well, that's nice and all. But a page on Obama's website doesn't change the media narrative |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:21 PM |
#25 |
| -
The media promoted the Iraq war. Do you really think they care? n/t |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:23 PM |
#29 |
| -
It's a matter of forcing them to cover what YOU want them to cover. And finding the right |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:29 PM |
#36 |
| -
Exactly. Obama should launch a huge assault on Hillary's honesty tommorow morning |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:30 PM |
#38 |
| -
Complete lunacy. You're running around here crying about Wright, |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:35 PM |
#43 |
| -
Why? It changes the media's "narrative" and takes their attention off Wright |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:36 PM |
#45 |
| -
And he has a lot more brains than you do, too. Which is why he's where he's at, and you are where |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:19 PM |
#68 |
| -
Forcing them? Do you know how the media works? |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:33 PM |
#41 |
| -
either Obama does something to change the media narrative or he's toast. If not |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:42 PM |
#46 |
| -
That's nonsense! n/t |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:48 PM |
#50 |
| -
The media narrative has yet to change votes. |
bhikkhu |
Apr-28-08 11:26 PM |
#70 |
| -
Her achilles heel is her DISHONESTY and her inappropriate laughing and babbling. |
Skwmom |
Apr-28-08 10:23 PM |
#28 |
| -
And that's where he should attack her. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:26 PM |
#32 |
| -
He won't do it. He's too goody-two shoes to scrap. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:27 PM |
#33 |
| -
The GOP will do it to her in the fall and she will lose because of it. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:29 PM |
#35 |
| -
We'll see. |
zidzi |
Apr-28-08 10:44 PM |
#47 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Apr-28-08 10:57 PM |
#56 |
| -
You might be right but I think it's more like this... |
Bread and Circus |
Apr-28-08 10:54 PM |
#54 |
| -
That logic is ass-backwards. |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 11:00 PM |
#59 |
| -
That's not how it works with people, sorry. |
Bread and Circus |
Apr-28-08 11:03 PM |
#62 |
| -
That's your opinion. |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 11:08 PM |
#63 |
| -
It's not a matter of opinion. You push people, they push back. Even children know this. |
Bread and Circus |
Apr-29-08 09:16 AM |
#86 |
| -
If Obama doesn't show he can FIGHT, he'll lose the GE if not the nomination. |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 11:02 PM |
#60 |
| -
I think it's just a matter of picking the right battles. Nuking Clinton right now would be... |
Bread and Circus |
Apr-29-08 09:18 AM |
#87 |
| -
IF we could stop trying to dictate to the winner |
quakerboy |
Apr-28-08 11:51 PM |
#75 |
| -
Obama is no longer winning. He is losing his way to the nomination and getting trashed |
cryingshame |
Apr-29-08 07:37 AM |
#82 |
| -
Because that D-Punjab memo worked out so well... |
BeyondGeography |
Apr-29-08 01:01 AM |
#80 |
| -
again, those were Hillary's OWN WORDS. If Obama's camp is too stupid too use this |
cryingshame |
Apr-29-08 07:35 AM |
#81 |
| -
I'd like to see a few gut shots myself, but I don't think he's that kind of politician. eom |
smiley_glad_hands |
Apr-29-08 08:06 AM |
#84 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread