nebula
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-28-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
| 72. It will be a Pyhrric victory |
|
if Obama lets this thing get to the convention.
It will likely destroy his chances in the GE.
He needed to put her away once and for all, he has failed to do that.
|
| -If Obama Can't Attack Hillary's Soft White Underbelly (Outsourcing To India) He's Incompetent |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:00 PM |
#0 |
 -
I agree. HE NEEDS TO ATTACK HER! SHE'S SOO VULNERABLE! |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:00 PM |
#1 |
  -
Key word being ATTACK |
oneofthepeople |
Apr-29-08 08:29 AM |
#85 |
| -
When are you running? You make it sound so easy. How much do you charge for advising campaigns? |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:02 PM |
#2 |
| -
You don't think this would work? |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:03 PM |
#3 |
| -
Work to do what? He's on track to have won a majority of all the pledged delegates |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:53 PM |
#52 |
| -
I know enough about people and politics to see Hillary's soft white underbelly EXPOSED. |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:04 PM |
#4 |
| -
So why aren't you making the big bucks? Look, Obama has run a brilliant campaign, he's got |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:46 PM |
#48 |
| -
Time to do a Harry Truman on Hillary. |
tabasco |
Apr-28-08 10:04 PM |
#5 |
| -
I agree. No smears, just facts. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:05 PM |
#7 |
| -
BO can't oppose outsourcing without offending his corporate sponsors. n/t |
jody |
Apr-28-08 10:04 PM |
#6 |
| -
Hillary's been lying about it from day 1. It's time Obama called her on it. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:06 PM |
#8 |
| -
BO's advisers know a president cannot function without support of the corporatist party. n/t |
jody |
Apr-28-08 10:17 PM |
#17 |
| -
And HRC has that support in pocket? |
bhikkhu |
Apr-28-08 11:21 PM |
#69 |
| -
I did not say that. n/t |
jody |
Apr-29-08 07:57 AM |
#83 |
| -
Jesus... He Knows That She's Trying To Suck Him Into A Mud Fight... |
WillyT |
Apr-28-08 10:06 PM |
#9 |
| -
This isn't mud. He would attack with truth. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:07 PM |
#10 |
| -
Maybe you should write a letter to the editor and let them know. If you think it's important enough |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:55 PM |
#55 |
| -
exposing Hillary's soft-white underbelly isn't a mud-fight. It's simply calling attention |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:08 PM |
#11 |
| -
He's going to lose unless he drops this 'politics of hope' crapola. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:09 PM |
#12 |
| -
Politics of Hope can involve attacks. Just not smears. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:10 PM |
#13 |
| -
Same difference. He needs to destroy Clinton, completely |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:19 PM |
#19 |
| -
I agree with you. But he doesn't have to abandon the "Politics of Hope." |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:20 PM |
#22 |
| -
Voters don't give a shit about the politics of hope. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:21 PM |
#24 |
| -
Why? He's going to win the nomination anyway. Why go negative? So you feel better? |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:57 PM |
#57 |
| -
Exactly, if he's not willing to fight, people sense that. And now HILLARY has taken up that rhetoric |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:11 PM |
#14 |
| -
And Then Politics Will NEVER Change... And We Will Get What We Deserve... |
WillyT |
Apr-28-08 10:11 PM |
#15 |
| -
The essence of politics will never change. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:19 PM |
#18 |
| -
Hell yes they do |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 10:51 PM |
#51 |
| -
He doesn't need to. |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:11 PM |
#16 |
| -
then how do you propose he change the media narrative, dominate a news cycle? |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:20 PM |
#21 |
| -
I don't knopw that he needs to. |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:21 PM |
# |
| -
you mean 41% LOSES. Sorry, that's weak. And by the time the GE comes along-he's permanently |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:22 PM |
#26 |
| -
Not really |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:31 PM |
#39 |
| -
You are wasting you superior intellect here on DU. I bet there are a ton of POTUS candidates that |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:03 PM |
#61 |
| -
He's guaranteed to lose Indiana--too many white people |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:22 PM |
#27 |
| -
He doesn't need to. |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 10:58 PM |
#58 |
| -
He's in REAL danger of losing the nomination. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:20 PM |
#23 |
| -
No, Hillary still can't win. It's over. n/t |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:24 PM |
#30 |
| -
Sure she can win it. The remaining superdelegates can |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:26 PM |
#31 |
| -
"The remaining superdelegates can all vote for her." |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:29 PM |
#37 |
| -
No. If all 200 uncommitted Superdelegates vote for her, she's |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:32 PM |
#40 |
| -
If you rounded up a million $100 donations for Hill, she wouldn't be broke. Now get going! |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:13 PM |
#64 |
| -
you know, even IF/WHEN he gets nominated, he'll still be a milquetoast elitist |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:33 PM |
#42 |
| -
Ahh, well, everybody has an opinion. |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:14 PM |
#65 |
| -
Its stupid for him to think like that |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 10:53 PM |
#53 |
| -
Winning isn't resting. But going for the bait is stupid. And he's not stupid |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:15 PM |
#66 |
| -
Letting your guard down when you're ahead |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 11:33 PM |
#71 |
| -
Yet he's going to get the majority of pledged delegates on May 20th. And |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:47 PM |
#73 |
| -
It will be a Pyhrric victory |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 11:47 PM |
#72 |
| -
It isn't going to the convention. And he will never put her away. He will let her put herself away. |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:49 PM |
#74 |
| -
She is very much alive and kicking |
nebula |
Apr-29-08 12:16 AM |
#76 |
| -
You aren't suggest he "Wellstone" her are you? |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-29-08 12:25 AM |
#77 |
| -
Don't be ridiculous |
nebula |
Apr-29-08 12:48 AM |
#78 |
| -
His opponents have put this race into over drive |
nebula |
Apr-29-08 12:53 AM |
#79 |
| -
A 10 point loss is actually above his needed rate. |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:28 PM |
#34 |
| -
Superdelegates still exist. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:36 PM |
#44 |
| -
She would still need more than 60% of those |
Gore1FL |
Apr-28-08 10:47 PM |
#49 |
| -
Well Hillary IS losing and she's broke. And she's looking vindictive and meanspirited. |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:17 PM |
#67 |
| -
All he needs to do is stick to the facts |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:20 PM |
#20 |
| -
well, that's nice and all. But a page on Obama's website doesn't change the media narrative |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:21 PM |
#25 |
| -
The media promoted the Iraq war. Do you really think they care? n/t |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:23 PM |
#29 |
| -
It's a matter of forcing them to cover what YOU want them to cover. And finding the right |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:29 PM |
#36 |
| -
Exactly. Obama should launch a huge assault on Hillary's honesty tommorow morning |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:30 PM |
#38 |
| -
Complete lunacy. You're running around here crying about Wright, |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:35 PM |
#43 |
| -
Why? It changes the media's "narrative" and takes their attention off Wright |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:36 PM |
#45 |
| -
And he has a lot more brains than you do, too. Which is why he's where he's at, and you are where |
John Q. Citizen |
Apr-28-08 11:19 PM |
#68 |
| -
Forcing them? Do you know how the media works? |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:33 PM |
#41 |
| -
either Obama does something to change the media narrative or he's toast. If not |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 10:42 PM |
#46 |
| -
That's nonsense! n/t |
ProSense |
Apr-28-08 10:48 PM |
#50 |
| -
The media narrative has yet to change votes. |
bhikkhu |
Apr-28-08 11:26 PM |
#70 |
| -
Her achilles heel is her DISHONESTY and her inappropriate laughing and babbling. |
Skwmom |
Apr-28-08 10:23 PM |
#28 |
| -
And that's where he should attack her. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:26 PM |
#32 |
| -
He won't do it. He's too goody-two shoes to scrap. |
geek tragedy |
Apr-28-08 10:27 PM |
#33 |
| -
The GOP will do it to her in the fall and she will lose because of it. |
anonymous171 |
Apr-28-08 10:29 PM |
#35 |
| -
We'll see. |
zidzi |
Apr-28-08 10:44 PM |
#47 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Apr-28-08 10:57 PM |
#56 |
| -
You might be right but I think it's more like this... |
Bread and Circus |
Apr-28-08 10:54 PM |
#54 |
| -
That logic is ass-backwards. |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 11:00 PM |
#59 |
| -
That's not how it works with people, sorry. |
Bread and Circus |
Apr-28-08 11:03 PM |
#62 |
| -
That's your opinion. |
nebula |
Apr-28-08 11:08 PM |
#63 |
| -
It's not a matter of opinion. You push people, they push back. Even children know this. |
Bread and Circus |
Apr-29-08 09:16 AM |
#86 |
| -
If Obama doesn't show he can FIGHT, he'll lose the GE if not the nomination. |
cryingshame |
Apr-28-08 11:02 PM |
#60 |
| -
I think it's just a matter of picking the right battles. Nuking Clinton right now would be... |
Bread and Circus |
Apr-29-08 09:18 AM |
#87 |
| -
IF we could stop trying to dictate to the winner |
quakerboy |
Apr-28-08 11:51 PM |
#75 |
| -
Obama is no longer winning. He is losing his way to the nomination and getting trashed |
cryingshame |
Apr-29-08 07:37 AM |
#82 |
| -
Because that D-Punjab memo worked out so well... |
BeyondGeography |
Apr-29-08 01:01 AM |
#80 |
| -
again, those were Hillary's OWN WORDS. If Obama's camp is too stupid too use this |
cryingshame |
Apr-29-08 07:35 AM |
#81 |
| -
I'd like to see a few gut shots myself, but I don't think he's that kind of politician. eom |
smiley_glad_hands |
Apr-29-08 08:06 AM |
#84 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread