You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Because he says so. It's a faith-based candidacy. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Because he says so. It's a faith-based candidacy.
He says he'll do certain things, so we know he'll do them. We know how he would have voted on the IWR because he told us, even though he also told us he didn't know how he'd have voted.

He's avoided the hard votes, but he's a fighter.

The simple truth is that he's deeply flawed in precisely the same way Hillary Clinton is: he's a serial maneuverer and a ubercautious favor currier. Expecting bold and courageous acts from him is as silly as expecting them from her, except there's one difference: she actually tried something along those lines once, and regardless of the drubbing she took for it, she actually DID it.

They both leave a lot to be desired, but at least there's some acceptance of this reality by many when considering her; far too many have bought the grandiloquent PR of him like the crowd at a 40 Days of Faith Show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Confessions of an Obama Skeptic, Part I candice  Apr-27-08 09:26 PM   #0 
  - Oh, fuck you nt  WesDem   Apr-27-08 09:29 PM   #1 
  - WAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH  zlt234   Apr-27-08 10:37 PM   #12 
  - Here:  ProSense   Apr-27-08 09:32 PM   #2 
  - yeah, it isn't any less of a collection of strawmen upon a second reading  hfojvt   Apr-27-08 09:32 PM   #3 
  - We need more divisive politics and only Hillary can save us.  thunder rising   Apr-27-08 09:33 PM   #4 
  - YAY!!  goldcanyonaz   Apr-27-08 09:33 PM   #5 
  - Who do you trust? Who's smarter? Who's not the old game? You tell me. nt  babylonsister   Apr-27-08 09:34 PM   #6 
  - Part 1? Does this mean that there's going to be more of this shit?  Elrond Hubbard   Apr-27-08 09:39 PM   #7 
  - Looks like Part I is going to be posted more than once.  Laurab   Apr-27-08 11:23 PM   #16 
  - Apparently neither Obama nor his campaign can remember  DemGa   Apr-27-08 09:46 PM   #8 
  - ...and what have you found that suggests anything other than what Obama himself has stated?  MercutioATC   Apr-27-08 09:51 PM   #9 
  - He really couldn't say whether or not he would have voted for the war.  The_Casual_Observer   Apr-27-08 09:51 PM   #10 
  - Hillary would change what a president looks like; Obama would change what a president IS  frazzled   Apr-27-08 10:36 PM   #11 
  - Because he says so. It's a faith-based candidacy.  PurityOfEssence   Apr-27-08 10:47 PM   #13 
  - What are the dates when he spoke out against the war?  pointsoflight   Apr-27-08 10:52 PM   #14 
  - This is a snide attack. Why don't you post what you DO like about your candidate  Liberal Gramma   Apr-27-08 11:10 PM   #15 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC