Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 18. Our policy as a nation has been, for years, "proportional response" |
|
If the premise is an Iranian nuclear strike, that pretty much sets the "proportion" of the US response.
Things I learned watching The West Wing ...
Bake
|
| -Dear Hillary- Some images to drive a point home. |
Mother Of Four |
Apr-22-08 01:12 PM |
#0 |
 -
My dear friend, Chikako, is a survivor. |
ClayZ |
Apr-22-08 01:20 PM |
#1 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Apr-22-08 01:21 PM |
#2 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Apr-22-08 01:25 PM |
#5 |
| -
Oh - you mean Hillary. |
dchill |
Apr-22-08 01:27 PM |
#6 |
| -
Nope. Anyone who even remotely ponders their use needs to see these pics and more. |
Forkboy |
Apr-22-08 01:28 PM |
#7 |
| -
Typical disgusting Hillary supporter response. |
csorman |
Apr-22-08 01:29 PM |
#9 |
| -
How dare you? |
redqueen |
Apr-22-08 02:25 PM |
#14 |
| -
At least wait for Hillary to lose the nomination before nominating for any other queenship, but..... |
Exilednight |
Apr-22-08 03:04 PM |
#16 |
| -
I second that nomination. |
styersc |
Apr-22-08 03:17 PM |
#20 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Apr-22-08 03:20 PM |
#21 |
 -
Suggesting war has consequences beyond political benefits? How dramatic! |
Occam Bandage |
Apr-22-08 03:32 PM |
#28 |
| -
kick |
DerekJ |
Apr-22-08 01:22 PM |
#3 |
| -
“What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad destruction |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Apr-22-08 01:25 PM |
#4 |
| -
Which is exactly why Iran needs to heed the warning. |
dbaker41 |
Apr-22-08 01:29 PM |
#8 |
| -
We have other measures before we come out with such cowboy |
goclark |
Apr-22-08 02:13 PM |
#12 |
| -
Our policy as a nation has been, for years, "proportional response" |
dbaker41 |
Apr-22-08 03:13 PM |
#18 |
| -
Fine, let proportional response be our tactic |
msallied |
Apr-22-08 03:20 PM |
#22 |
| -
Our policy is not isolationism. We defend our allies. |
dbaker41 |
Apr-22-08 03:31 PM |
#26 |
| -
If I recall, Israel has their own nukes. |
msallied |
Apr-22-08 03:33 PM |
#29 |
| -
Unofficially, they do. |
dbaker41 |
Apr-22-08 03:35 PM |
#32 |
| -
"They will have brought it on themselves" |
intaglio |
Apr-22-08 03:45 PM |
#34 |
| -
"They" meaning the hypothetical Iranian leaders who order a first strike on Israel. |
dbaker41 |
Apr-22-08 04:19 PM |
#36 |
| -
Nukes and "Obliteration" |
intaglio |
Apr-22-08 06:13 PM |
#38 |
| -
Uh you are aware that Iran is not yet in possession of nukes |
truedelphi |
Apr-22-08 05:52 PM |
#37 |
| -
I visited Nagasaki a few years ago |
goclark |
Apr-22-08 01:36 PM |
#10 |
| -
I visited Hiroshima |
oregonjen |
Apr-22-08 03:22 PM |
#25 |
| -
And the bombs they have nowadays are much, much bigger... |
n2doc |
Apr-22-08 01:48 PM |
#11 |
| -
It's horrifying- |
Mother Of Four |
Apr-22-08 02:17 PM |
#13 |
| -
Kick |
redqueen |
Apr-22-08 03:03 PM |
#15 |
| -
Nuclear weapons are monstrous and should off the table. Period. |
SoonerPride |
Apr-22-08 03:10 PM |
#17 |
| -
your candidate says they're on the table |
bigtree |
Apr-22-08 03:21 PM |
#23 |
| -
"All options are on the table" !="I will obliterate Iran." |
Occam Bandage |
Apr-22-08 03:33 PM |
#30 |
| -
Thank you. |
Bonobo |
Apr-22-08 03:15 PM |
#19 |
| -
I find this post offensive. |
Texas Hill Country |
Apr-22-08 03:21 PM |
#24 |
| -
I find your offense offensive. |
FlyingSquirrel |
Apr-22-08 03:32 PM |
#27 |
| -
If you find the reality of your candidate's proclamations offensive, take it up with her. |
Occam Bandage |
Apr-22-08 03:34 PM |
#31 |
| -
Yeah, obliteration is pretty offensive n/t |
sandnsea |
Apr-22-08 03:36 PM |
#33 |
| -
I find your candidate's beliefs offensive. n/t |
Catherina |
Apr-22-08 06:14 PM |
#39 |
| -
what a sad human being she is |
madrchsod |
Apr-22-08 04:10 PM |
#35 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread