You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #48: Your comments certainly imply clarity on the issue ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #37
48. Your comments certainly imply clarity on the issue ...
... saying Keith could have used the Wolff time to extend the Clinton interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -It's That Time Again Folks! Give it up for Keith Olbermann! hnmnf  Apr-21-08 07:20 PM   #0 
  - bravo...tough questions, she squirmed at times  rndmprsn   Apr-21-08 07:22 PM   #1 
  - Someone needs to tell her that we do not appreciate her chuckling  Truth Hurts A Lot   Apr-21-08 07:22 PM   #2 
  - Its okay, everybody knows now why she chuckles...its when she cant answer a question.  hnmnf   Apr-21-08 07:23 PM   #4 
  - That's not a chuckle. My vocabulary falls short in accurately classifying it ...  krkaufman   Apr-22-08 05:57 AM   #45 
  - hysterical Hillary  ROakes1019   Apr-21-08 07:22 PM   #3 
  - there may have been a gas leak in the room with her. Hysterical Hill was spinning dangerously  TheDonkey   Apr-21-08 07:31 PM   #15 
  - She always laughs when there is no good answer.  polichick   Apr-21-08 07:41 PM   #24 
  - It's a political maneuver. She started cackling as soon as Keith mentioned Scaiffe's name ...  krkaufman   Apr-22-08 06:00 AM   #46 
  - Hillary looked great.....  Oceansaway   Apr-21-08 07:23 PM   #5 
  - He's one of the few left that doesn't interrupt and voice his  Tribetime   Apr-21-08 07:29 PM   #10 
  - I was disappointed in the lack of follow up questions.  speedoo   Apr-21-08 07:25 PM   #6 
  - Its called being a respectful journalist.  hnmnf   Apr-21-08 07:26 PM   #7 
     - Well, he's now asking Richard Wolfe a f/u question re. Iran.  speedoo   Apr-21-08 07:28 PM   #8 
        - He didnt have time?  hnmnf   Apr-21-08 07:29 PM   #9 
        - He could have used the time he's now taking with Wolfe.  speedoo   Apr-21-08 07:30 PM   #12 
        - Talk to the producers, dont blame him.  hnmnf   Apr-21-08 07:31 PM   #14 
        - Sorry, but I disagree.  speedoo   Apr-21-08 07:35 PM   #20 
           - There is no reason to need to give him a pass. I think your argument is unwarranted.  hnmnf   Apr-21-08 07:35 PM   #21 
           - How is my argument unwarranted?  speedoo   Apr-21-08 07:37 PM   #22 
              - Cuz I think it was a good interview. It was nice to not hear an interview with constant interruption  hnmnf   Apr-21-08 07:38 PM   #23 
                 - As I said before, he could have used his time with Wolfe to ask her f/u questions.  speedoo   Apr-21-08 07:45 PM   #28 
                    - she had to go on Larry King tonight so that might have been all the  roguevalley   Apr-21-08 09:37 PM   #40 
                    - I believe the interview was recorded earlier and the Wolfe discussion was the wrap-up  SaveAmerica   Apr-22-08 08:35 AM   #54 
                       - Right, it was NOT a live interview  dmr   Apr-22-08 12:29 PM   #64 
           - Time constraints - not KO's  LibGranny   Apr-21-08 08:40 PM   #34 
              - That's not clear to me.  speedoo   Apr-21-08 09:32 PM   #37 
                 - Your comments certainly imply clarity on the issue ...  krkaufman   Apr-22-08 06:05 AM   #48 
        - I doubt that the time restriction was Keith's  krkaufman   Apr-22-08 06:02 AM   #47 
           - You could be right, of course.  speedoo   Apr-22-08 11:40 AM   #61 
        - He explained he was under a strict time schedule, taped before the show.  tridim   Apr-21-08 07:31 PM   #13 
           - I heard that, but I don't understand it. nt  speedoo   Apr-21-08 07:32 PM   #17 
              - Hillary gave him 15 minutes and that's it.  tridim   Apr-21-08 07:58 PM   #32 
              - How do you know that?  speedoo   Apr-21-08 09:33 PM   #38 
                 - I'm sorry I answered you without reading your other responses.  SaveAmerica   Apr-22-08 08:36 AM   #56 
                    - No problem.  speedoo   Apr-22-08 11:37 AM   #60 
              - teevee. nothing to understand.  roguevalley   Apr-21-08 09:47 PM   #41 
        - I think he had a list of carefully vetted questions and didn't have time.  roguevalley   Apr-21-08 09:35 PM   #39 
           - Yes, but I still don't understand the time constraint.  speedoo   Apr-22-08 11:48 AM   #63 
  - And he's also criticizng her responses with Richard Wolff right now!!!  OmmmSweetOmmm   Apr-21-08 07:30 PM   #11 
  - "Why was she laughing?"  ErinBerin84   Apr-21-08 07:32 PM   #16 
  - I'd like to insert a Give it up for Cafferty, too.  gateley   Apr-21-08 07:33 PM   #18 
  - Good job, Keith. Respectfully done. Thank you n/t  WIllo   Apr-21-08 07:33 PM   #19 
  - one thing  ErinBerin84   Apr-21-08 07:41 PM   #25 
  - So little time, so many questions.  hnmnf   Apr-21-08 07:42 PM   #26 
     - She had a good answer to the historical candidacies question  ErinBerin84   Apr-21-08 07:48 PM   #29 
        - Yea, though I could have sworn in the debate the question didnt mention Iran using a nuclear attack.  hnmnf   Apr-21-08 07:55 PM   #30 
  - I really enjoyed the post interview analysis with the Newsweek guy Wolffe! "Why did she laugh" :D  futureliveshere   Apr-21-08 07:43 PM   #27 
  - And Hillary was great too! Go Hillary!nt  yadayadayada   Apr-21-08 07:58 PM   #31 
  - HAHAHAHAHAHA  hnmnf   Apr-21-08 08:14 PM   #33 
  - Yes she was great - if  LibGranny   Apr-21-08 08:41 PM   #35 
  - I thought she looked furious. Those are the questions they pressured ABC to not ask.  Diane R   Apr-21-08 08:45 PM   #36 
  - I remember thinking how good it was that she will not be the one  roguevalley   Apr-21-08 09:49 PM   #42 
  - Actually, it would be  Ronnie   Apr-21-08 10:33 PM   #44 
     - Recent news would indicate otherwise  krkaufman   Apr-22-08 06:59 AM   #50 
     - Bingo. nt  speedoo   Apr-22-08 11:44 AM   #62 
     - really? Projecting much are you? I hear that the SDs are afraid  roguevalley   Apr-22-08 10:54 AM   #59 
  - You must know some important people at ABC to know this.  Ronnie   Apr-21-08 10:22 PM   #43 
  - Olbermann's a good man  CK dexter   Apr-22-08 06:21 AM   #49 
  - Maybe I'll have to find a video and watch it. I switched channels  Vinca   Apr-22-08 07:07 AM   #51 
  - video here....  leftchick   Apr-22-08 07:48 AM   #52 
  - Keith did a great job  madwivoter   Apr-22-08 08:06 AM   #53 
  - Kudos Keith Olbermann!  ShortnFiery   Apr-22-08 08:36 AM   #55 
  - Keith is the best thing on TV  maximusveritas   Apr-22-08 09:13 AM   #57 
  - Agreed!!!  truebrit71   Apr-22-08 09:18 AM   #58 
  - To her credit she did a good job at not answering the questions..  Bensthename   Apr-22-08 12:48 PM   #65 
  - He asked the right questions but allowed her to spin away w/ no follow-up.  stillrockin   Apr-22-08 01:18 PM   #66 
  - As a whole I though it was a fair interview.  Usrename   Apr-22-08 01:24 PM   #67 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC