You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: Franken was on Hardball [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. Franken was on Hardball
and Tweety said the Vp's are down to three. Pick one. Franken said..."Oh, I don't know. ANY of the three would be good." Then Tweety said..."Pick One...Pick One...Pick One"...so he did. He said Edwards, but only after he was forced to choose by Tweety. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -I think Edwards is an unfavorable candidate for VP familydoctor  Jun-16-04 10:42 AM   #0 
  - I think choosing Edwards would be another signal  BurtWorm   Jun-16-04 10:44 AM   #1 
  - It makes absolutely ZERO sense to choose Edwards.  cosmokramer   Jun-16-04 10:46 AM   #2 
  - What's with the need to knock Edwards?  chimpymustgo   Jun-16-04 11:27 AM   #11 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-16-04 11:40 AM   #12 
     - Franken and Press do not impress me.  familydoctor   Jun-16-04 11:42 AM   #13 
     - Franken was on Hardball  in_cog_ni_to   Jun-16-04 09:13 PM   #33 
     - Where's the tear down? n/t  venus   Jun-17-04 07:12 PM   #43 
  - Edwards still has more experience working in government  demnan   Jun-16-04 10:47 AM   #3 
  - Who said anything about Clark?  cosmokramer   Jun-16-04 10:56 AM   #7 
  - You've got to be joking  hf_jai   Jun-16-04 12:04 PM   #15 
  - military serves the government. It is not the government  Cheswick   Jun-16-04 09:18 PM   #34 
  - Give me a break. Edwards barely  venus   Jun-17-04 07:09 PM   #42 
  - Edwards is Inspiring, Youthful, and Southern  ribofunk   Jun-16-04 10:52 AM   #4 
  - It would be most unfortunate if the Dems put two Iraq hawks on the ticket.  BurtWorm   Jun-16-04 10:55 AM   #6 
  - Yeah, except for one little detail  hf_jai   Jun-16-04 12:08 PM   #17 
     - But Edwards did not.  BurtWorm   Jun-16-04 12:15 PM   #19 
        - Oops  hf_jai   Jun-16-04 06:33 PM   #32 
  - And he's so cute!  TexasSissy   Jun-16-04 11:03 AM   #9 
  - Agreed, and...  jtb33   Jun-16-04 10:54 AM   #5 
  - 1960: JFK and LBJ. n/t  Padraig18   Jun-16-04 12:52 PM   #23 
  - Okay, in order....  punpirate   Jun-16-04 10:57 AM   #8 
  - touche'  familydoctor   Jun-16-04 11:21 AM   #10 
     - In my heart, I hope your brother returns to relative safety...  punpirate   Jun-16-04 12:10 PM   #18 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-17-04 07:19 PM   #44 
  - These points aren't "the" point, though.  TexasSissy   Jun-16-04 11:50 AM   #14 
  - I guess I see the "swing voters" in the "swing states" differently...  familydoctor   Jun-16-04 12:07 PM   #16 
  - I don't want another war profiting VP  julialnyc   Jun-16-04 12:25 PM   #20 
  - And that is just one of many reasons...  cosmokramer   Jun-16-04 12:41 PM   #21 
  - *ahem* Blind trust means...  leyton   Jun-16-04 04:13 PM   #30 
  - Number one rule when picking a VP:  ibegurpard   Jun-16-04 12:48 PM   #22 
  - The deal breaker for me with  cosmokramer   Jun-16-04 02:21 PM   #25 
  - trial lawyer impact overplayed  mrboba1   Jun-16-04 01:42 PM   #24 
  - you have to look at the swing states  Cheswick   Jun-16-04 09:23 PM   #35 
  - As far as I'm concerned...Edwards brings absolutely nothing  Anti Bush   Jun-16-04 03:03 PM   #26 
  - I agree about Edwards...but what does Clark bring?  Cheswick   Jun-16-04 09:24 PM   #36 
     - What do mean by covered though?  Jim4Wes   Jun-16-04 10:06 PM   #39 
  - Your four points...  Darkamber   Jun-16-04 03:07 PM   #27 
  - Comparing Edwards to Bush  mgm   Jun-16-04 03:42 PM   #28 
     - Actually the voters picked Gore...  Darkamber   Jun-16-04 03:57 PM   #29 
        - He isn't up to task...  cosmokramer   Jun-16-04 06:17 PM   #31 
           - I disagree and so do many others...  Darkamber   Jun-16-04 10:00 PM   #37 
           - I disagree and so do many others...  Darkamber   Jun-16-04 10:00 PM   #38 
  - I do not think that Edwards would not be a good choice.  Nicholas_J   Jun-16-04 10:39 PM   #40 
  - Same old flawed rationale  AwsieDooger   Jun-17-04 04:20 AM   #41 
  - How would Edwards measure up against Cheney one on one? Or McCain?  venus   Jun-17-04 07:28 PM   #45 
     - That's what I'm wondering, too...  Jonathan Little   Jun-17-04 07:40 PM   #46 
  - It's John Kerry's choice, but I disagree with your rationale.  Zorra   Jun-17-04 08:56 PM   #47 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC