You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #: I disagree, I think the 45-45 numbers are probably closer to the truth than the six point gap. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:36 AM
Original message
I disagree, I think the 45-45 numbers are probably closer to the truth than the six point gap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -New Pennsylvania Numbers: Clinton 50, Obama 44 Hope And Change  Apr-08-08 08:24 AM   #0 
  - kicking!  slinkerwink   Apr-08-08 08:27 AM   #1 
  - Here is more from Quinnipiac  dkf   Apr-08-08 08:30 AM   #2 
  - Hillary voters are finally wising up!  0007   Apr-08-08 08:33 AM   #4 
  - Interesting info dkf .Thanks for posting!  Hope And Change   Apr-08-08 08:34 AM   #5 
  - these seem more realistic than the ones that had 45-45  tishaLA   Apr-08-08 08:33 AM   #3 
  - I disagree, I think the 45-45 numbers are probably closer to the truth than the six point gap.  hnmnf   Apr-08-08 08:36 AM   # 
  - I hope you're right  tishaLA   Apr-08-08 08:53 AM   #8 
     - A 29 point loss was never a victory. Anything over 20 I think is embarrassing.  hnmnf   Apr-08-08 08:55 AM   #10 
        - shhhhhhhhhhh!  tishaLA   Apr-08-08 09:01 AM   #11 
           - Nobody really buys THAT low of depressed expectations  hnmnf   Apr-08-08 09:10 AM   #12 
  - I tend to agree, but I'm not sure why.  Orsino   Apr-08-08 09:16 AM   #14 
  - How soon before PA is "not important"?  dancingme   Apr-08-08 08:36 AM   #6 
  - You are right.Sad but true!  Hope And Change   Apr-08-08 08:37 AM   #7 
  - LOL! I certainly wouldn't put it past them.  Window   Apr-08-08 10:32 AM   #15 
  - This is very good news. No wonder Ed Rendell was trying to lower  Tarheel_Dem   Apr-08-08 08:54 AM   #9 
  - One reason polls miss the trends: they don't poll people without  alfredo   Apr-08-08 09:11 AM   #13 
  - Isn't there a new SUSA poll that is bad for us in Pa.?  thevoiceofreason   Apr-08-08 10:35 AM   #16 
  - getting closer  grantcart   Apr-08-08 10:55 AM   #17 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC