You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Gatekeeping is something she gets and is good at. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Gatekeeping is something she gets and is good at.
Identify the gatekeepers and put them on the payroll, CIA-style. In fact it's the same operation. That's why she was Lady Inevitable for four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hillarys Problem: She thinks we're still as dumb as we were in 1992. Wolsh  Apr-05-08 12:27 PM   #0 
  - So, you believe that Bush should have won a second term in 1992?  niceypoo   Apr-05-08 12:30 PM   #1 
  - I'm saying that politics were different in 1992, and we were a different type of voter  Wolsh   Apr-05-08 12:31 PM   #2 
  - So you deny that you have hitched your wagon to a bonafied Loser?  JackORoses   Apr-05-08 12:34 PM   #5 
  - Huh?? Poppy did the same thing then that HRC is doing today.  ClassWarrior   Apr-05-08 12:35 PM   #7 
  - Nope. Jerry Brown was right though...  jefferson_dem   Apr-05-08 12:37 PM   #8 
  - They way they lied about Brown in 92 was disgusting  jgraz   Apr-05-08 01:02 PM   #25 
     - No kidding!  Nedsdag   Apr-05-08 01:08 PM   #28 
        - It was actually far worse than that  jgraz   Apr-05-08 01:12 PM   #32 
           - Did Bill say the charges carried no merit  gateley   Apr-05-08 01:19 PM   #37 
           - I don't remember the press even questioning Bill on it  jgraz   Apr-05-08 01:20 PM   #38 
           - So, the 'Larry Sinclair' scenario is actually a reprise of what TeamClinton did to Jerry Brown?  blm   Apr-05-08 01:30 PM   #40 
              - I must confess, I've completely ignored the Larry Sinclair story  jgraz   Apr-05-08 01:47 PM   #41 
  - hilarious isn't it  griffi94   Apr-05-08 12:38 PM   #9 
  - What's hilarious is how HRC's defenders ignore legitimate criticisms that...  ClassWarrior   Apr-05-08 12:41 PM   #12 
  - right the legitimate  griffi94   Apr-05-08 12:46 PM   #18 
     - No argument from me. Just keep doing what you've been doing all along.  ClassWarrior   Apr-05-08 12:48 PM   #19 
     - No, the legit concerns like her constant proven lying.  Zhade   Apr-06-08 01:17 AM   #60 
  - You really don't see that the same people own the Clintons and the Bushes?  dbonds   Apr-05-08 01:09 PM   #29 
  - Begs the question, do YOU wish Pres. GHWBush and his cronies had faced impeachment hearings on BCCI  blm   Apr-05-08 12:57 PM   #23 
  - LOL - real problem is folks like some DUers want to be conned by a pretend change fellow who  papau   Apr-05-08 01:05 PM   #27 
     - Hill would REALLY continue to protect BushInc just as Bill did. You need to PRETEND she won't.  blm   Apr-05-08 01:12 PM   #31 
  - I was thinking along those lines  gateley   Apr-05-08 12:33 PM   #3 
  - She is lost in the 20th Century  goclark   Apr-05-08 12:33 PM   #4 
  - It's the old saying.. If you want more of what you're getting,  gateley   Apr-05-08 01:22 PM   #39 
  - The internet has not been her friend  truedelphi   Apr-05-08 12:35 PM   #6 
  - And that's why she's failing  WolverineDG   Apr-05-08 12:40 PM   #11 
  - No, the truth has not been her friend  jgraz   Apr-05-08 01:03 PM   #26 
  - Remember when she said the web needed "gatekeeping?"  leftstreet   Apr-05-08 12:39 PM   #10 
  - Gatekeeping is something she gets and is good at.  dailykoff   Apr-05-08 12:45 PM   #17 
  - Larry Johnson's No Quarter anyone?  Moochy   Apr-06-08 01:13 AM   #59 
  - Reminds me of BushJr's "too much freedom" comment abou tthe internet. n/t  PoliticalAmazon   Apr-05-08 12:50 PM   #20 
  - Good point.  dailykoff   Apr-05-08 12:42 PM   #13 
  - I believe you're absolutely right. We see this over and over again  pdxmom   Apr-05-08 12:43 PM   #14 
  - She's playing to an uninformed audience who see a D and think it means change.  mod mom   Apr-05-08 12:44 PM   #15 
  - the Obama slime machine here for all to see  Taxmyth   Apr-05-08 12:44 PM   #16 
  - "Fucking GOP plants?" YOU're calling 90% of DUers "fucking GOP plants?"  ClassWarrior   Apr-05-08 12:53 PM   #21 
  - Yes. Yes I am  Taxmyth   Apr-05-08 04:26 PM   #43 
     - Then leave.  ClassWarrior   Apr-05-08 10:48 PM   #49 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-05-08 11:04 PM   #52 
           - My name isn't Obama. And I don't like disruptors like you.  ClassWarrior   Apr-06-08 12:16 AM   #57 
              - posting nothing but attacks on a Democratic candidate  Taxmyth   Apr-06-08 01:09 AM   #58 
                 - Objective observers are welcome to judge which of us is attacking Dems...  ClassWarrior   Apr-06-08 11:15 AM   #63 
                    - Hmmm... Where did you go?  ClassWarrior   Apr-06-08 11:54 PM   #66 
                       - Tried to be reasonable  Taxmyth   Apr-07-08 01:51 AM   #71 
                          - Again, I'll leave it to the reader to decide who's doing the "tearing down"...  ClassWarrior   Apr-07-08 09:05 AM   #73 
                          - I don't think you know what the definition of reasonable is  BornBlue   Apr-07-08 11:34 AM   #74 
  - Usual RW tactics of blaming the other side on your own guilt.  dbonds   Apr-05-08 01:14 PM   #35 
  - Will they stay committed  Taxmyth   Apr-05-08 04:27 PM   #44 
     - Will you ask more idiotic questions in a lame attempt to sow doubt?  ClassWarrior   Apr-05-08 10:51 PM   #50 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-05-08 11:10 PM   #54 
     - The same question could probably be asked of you.  Kool Kitty   Apr-06-08 02:09 AM   #61 
        - 30+ years of Democratic Party support  Taxmyth   Apr-07-08 01:40 AM   #67 
  - Most real democrats are getting behind Obama...  Wolsh   Apr-05-08 02:10 PM   #42 
     - Nothing positive only negative  Taxmyth   Apr-05-08 04:29 PM   #45 
        - I'm positive in my support for the presumtive democratic nominee, not a McCain endorsing  Wolsh   Apr-05-08 06:39 PM   #48 
           - Fine reasons  Taxmyth   Apr-05-08 11:02 PM   #51 
              - So if I am an Obama supporter,  Kool Kitty   Apr-06-08 02:15 AM   #62 
                 - First, reading comprehension is an important tool  Taxmyth   Apr-07-08 01:46 AM   #69 
  - The Internet magnifies dumb more than it does smart.  gulliver   Apr-05-08 12:54 PM   #22 
  - She hasn't fooled the INFORMED internet who access National Security Archives and read BCCI report  blm   Apr-05-08 01:11 PM   #30 
  - I have thought this for a long time  bigbrother05   Apr-05-08 12:57 PM   #24 
  - Isn't this a DEM bash?  L. Coyote   Apr-05-08 01:13 PM   #33 
  - Another thing is that Bill is a much better liar.  dailykoff   Apr-05-08 01:14 PM   #34 
  - Well, then she has had an awakening.  Life Long Dem   Apr-05-08 01:15 PM   #36 
  - Another example of hilary not  zidzi   Apr-05-08 04:35 PM   #46 
  - It seems like Hillary didn't cross that bridge  Raine   Apr-05-08 05:22 PM   #47 
  - Actually, for myself, i might not be as sharp as was then.  nolabels   Apr-05-08 11:05 PM   #53 
  - Like it or not, Clinton is our "Reagan," and each time a Democrat  BenDavid   Apr-05-08 11:11 PM   #55 
  - I think that they are running..  stillcool47   Apr-05-08 11:44 PM   #56 
  - LOL! You actually got it right, but not as you intended  Awsi Dooger   Apr-06-08 11:54 AM   #64 
  - Don't think a lot of Obama supporters' parents are telling them the truth about the 90's.  Darth_Kitten   Apr-06-08 11:56 AM   #65 
  - The 90s weren't great  Mimosa   Apr-07-08 02:59 AM   #72 
  - Lie number infinity-whatever: "Women didn't vote anywhere in the US until 1920".  boppers   Apr-07-08 01:44 AM   #68 
     - Linkies:  boppers   Apr-07-08 01:49 AM   #70 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC