readmoreoften
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
| 78. Yes that makes you sound really 'grown up.' Do you also criticize people for 'demonizing' GWB? |
|
If I mentioned, say Pol Pot, do you have a knee-jerk reaction? Do all leaders represent "complex sets of decisions and policies that in retrospect deserve both criticism and praise?"
1) A poll is not an argument. It's a set of questions. 2) Defend the foreign policy of Ronald Reagan in... say... Nicaragua. Having lived there, I'd love to hear your balanced, 'rational' opinion. Not interested in defending Iran-Contra, how about our support of right-wing paramilitary in Guatemala?
Sorry to offend your sensibilities with polemics, but you can justify anything via rational argument and you can postpone any moral judgment with claims of 'infinite complexity'.
|
| -For Obama supporters who say that Obama is 'antiwar'. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:17 PM |
#0 |
-
that one sentence by itself is a little out of context |
JoeIsOneOfUs |
Mar-30-08 06:20 PM |
#1 |
 -
It's not out of context. It's a direct quote. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:25 PM |
#11 |
  -
I didn't say you misquoted. I said the surrounding context was missing. nt |
JoeIsOneOfUs |
Mar-30-08 06:30 PM |
#16 |
  -
maybe you should read more often... |
progdonkey |
Mar-30-08 06:36 PM |
#26 |
   -
I read plenty. Thanks for your concern. It's a direct quote from your hero who I take at his word. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:52 PM |
#38 |
  -
now you're misquoting (changing words) |
JoeIsOneOfUs |
Mar-30-08 06:59 PM |
#44 |
   -
Point out the Barack Obama in this post. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:04 PM |
#48 |
  -
he's not my "hero"... |
progdonkey |
Mar-30-08 07:25 PM |
#57 |
  -
I'm criticizing the fact that he even called Reagan and Bush 41's policies realistic. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:39 PM |
#63 |
  -
Hear hear. Unfortunately we have lost the historical argument on this. |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:15 PM |
#91 |
  -
You understand that something can be a direct quote and still out of context, right? |
stevenleser |
Mar-30-08 06:46 PM |
#36 |
   -
Let's give this a try. Fictitious candidate from the future. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:58 PM |
#42 |
  -
LOLOLOL! I'm gonna quote you on that - and out of context even.... |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-30-08 07:23 PM |
#55 |
  -
DUers hate Gravel. They tolerate Kucinich only because he's considered an eccentric oddball |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:19 PM |
#92 |
 -
Gulf War I left us Stronger???????????? |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:11 PM |
#88 |
-
Kick for more votes please. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:20 PM |
#2 |
-
Has ANY president been anti-war? |
anonymous171 |
Mar-30-08 06:21 PM |
#3 |
 -
Didn't Obama say he was against "stupid wars"? nt |
JoeIsOneOfUs |
Mar-30-08 06:22 PM |
#6 |
  -
Yeah. I took that to mean that he was against neoconservative foreign policy. |
anonymous171 |
Mar-30-08 06:23 PM |
#9 |
 -
Obviously he's not. He endorses permanent bases in Iraq -- which Kerry campaigned AGAINST |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:23 PM |
#94 |
 -
he wasn't antiwar. |
zonmoy |
Mar-30-08 06:24 PM |
#10 |
-
I know that. But he is also considered the greatest Democrat. Ever. |
anonymous171 |
Mar-30-08 06:25 PM |
#12 |
-
that doesn't mean that he was a saint. |
zonmoy |
Mar-30-08 06:37 PM |
#27 |
 -
Yeah. I get it. |
anonymous171 |
Mar-30-08 06:59 PM |
#46 |
-
none that I have ever heard of. |
zonmoy |
Mar-30-08 09:13 PM |
#89 |
-
I thought Jefferson was the greatest Democrat ever. |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:25 PM |
#95 |
-
Other: I cannot vote in this poll or any like it until "in some ways" has been clearly defined. |
Swamp Rat |
Mar-30-08 06:21 PM |
#4 |
 -
He says 'in some ways' like Reagan but he does not say 'in some ways' like GHWB. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:27 PM |
#15 |
-
Until Obama defines what he meant by "in some ways," it's all speculation. |
Swamp Rat |
Mar-30-08 06:32 PM |
#22 |
-
That is true in the case of Reagan, but what about George Bush 1? |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:36 PM |
#25 |
-
I see what you mean. |
Swamp Rat |
Mar-30-08 07:28 PM |
#59 |
-
Thanks Swamp Rat. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:48 PM |
#68 |
-
Estoy de acuerdo. |
Swamp Rat |
Mar-30-08 07:57 PM |
#74 |
-
I lived in Bluefields. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 08:19 PM |
#81 |
-
Obama is NOT anti-war. I can understand why some of his supporters think he is, but he's not. |
Skip Intro |
Mar-30-08 06:22 PM |
#5 |
-
Obama specifically said he's not against all wars, just stupid wars |
maximusveritas |
Mar-30-08 06:23 PM |
#7 |
 -
So Iraq I, Panama, Faukland Islands were not 'stupid wars'? |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:32 PM |
#21 |
-
Iraq I was not a stupid war. Al Gore, among others, supported it. |
nsd |
Mar-30-08 06:39 PM |
#29 |
-
Iraq I was a stupid war, but it was a well handled stupid war. Panama was for personal bush family |
John Q. Citizen |
Mar-30-08 06:58 PM |
#41 |
-
Agreed. These stupid wars were all handled much better than Iraq II. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:24 PM |
#56 |
-
It's the height of foolishness, egotism and partisanship |
nomad1776 |
Mar-30-08 06:23 PM |
#8 |
 -
It shames you to see "Republicans" act like a horses ass when Obama mentions a Republican? |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:30 PM |
#17 |
-
Ahh and there is one of the fools I am referring to |
nomad1776 |
Mar-30-08 06:46 PM |
#34 |
-
And that's called an ad hominem attack. It's what people use when they have no argument. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:08 PM |
#50 |
-
Are you voting for McKinney? |
sandnsea |
Mar-30-08 06:26 PM |
#13 |
-
Other, that was not how Obama meant this |
stevenleser |
Mar-30-08 06:27 PM |
#14 |
-
. |
baldguy |
Mar-30-08 06:30 PM |
#18 |
 -
LOL! nt |
JoeIsOneOfUs |
Mar-30-08 06:32 PM |
#20 |
 -
No. Every time someone asks an Obama thug a question it's not a strawman you moron. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 06:34 PM |
#23 |
-
Ascribing a position to Obama which he does not hold |
baldguy |
Mar-30-08 06:59 PM |
#45 |
-
Really. Then refute it instead of calling me names. That's what I asked you to do. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:20 PM |
#53 |
-
Hillary Clinton eats puppies & kittens. |
baldguy |
Mar-30-08 07:22 PM |
#54 |
-
Exactly what I thought. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:26 PM |
#58 |
-
At least my argument isn't a straw man. |
baldguy |
Mar-30-08 07:46 PM |
#66 |
-
I didn't know there was a hierarchy of rhetorical sleaze. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:52 PM |
#70 |
-
Obama is not "anti-war". |
baldguy |
Mar-30-08 08:52 PM |
#84 |
-
I chose... |
Mooney |
Mar-30-08 06:31 PM |
#19 |
-
Limited engagement...... not occupation |
Johnny__Motown |
Mar-30-08 06:36 PM |
#24 |
-
I trust him much more with war decisions than I do McCain and Clinton |
Truth Hurts A Lot |
Mar-30-08 06:38 PM |
#28 |
-
None of the above. I trust Obama to keep us out of war. n/t |
invictus |
Mar-30-08 06:42 PM |
#30 |
-
You may disagree with them, but Bush 41 and Reagan didn't get us into any quagmires. |
TheWraith |
Mar-30-08 06:44 PM |
#31 |
 -
hey - no context allowed - (see above) |
JoeIsOneOfUs |
Mar-30-08 06:56 PM |
#40 |
 -
Fair enough. He'll only pick fights we can win. Acceptable reading of his position. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:02 PM |
#47 |
 -
They got us into the MidEast quagmire by placing troops in SA and funding Al Qaeda in Afghanisrtan |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:31 PM |
#96 |
-
The anti war acndidate was DK of who is left Barack is th next best thing. |
cooolandrew |
Mar-30-08 06:44 PM |
#32 |
-
The anti war cnadidate was DK of who is left Barack is the next best thing. |
cooolandrew |
Mar-30-08 06:44 PM |
#33 |
-
I feel confident that Obama will not take the country into war |
Skidmore |
Mar-30-08 06:46 PM |
#35 |
-
BO is a political chameleon, he'll "change" his position to whatever seems appropriate at the moment |
jody |
Mar-30-08 06:52 PM |
#37 |
 -
Only to people who refuse to READ the full content |
JayFredMuggs |
Mar-30-08 06:56 PM |
#39 |
-
As someone who just joined DU I think you should watch who you call a Republican. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:29 PM |
#60 |
-
I won't vote for someone who will not fight in some circumstances |
dmordue |
Mar-30-08 06:58 PM |
#43 |
 -
Then Obama's your candidate. |
baldguy |
Mar-30-08 07:07 PM |
#49 |
  -
everyone but perhaps kucinich fits |
dmordue |
Mar-30-08 07:17 PM |
#52 |
 -
Neither will I. But were Bush 41 and Reagan's circumstances acceptable is the question. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:11 PM |
#51 |
-
I read an article about the fusion of Moralists and Militarists that created our current mess. |
anonymous171 |
Mar-30-08 07:30 PM |
#61 |
-
Our mess is quite a mess indeed. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:41 PM |
#64 |
-
No problem. |
anonymous171 |
Mar-30-08 07:50 PM |
#69 |
 -
That's hitting the nail on the head. /nt |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:54 PM |
#71 |
-
Sad indeed |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:41 PM |
#97 |
-
Crafty poll |
Orwellian_Ghost |
Mar-30-08 07:33 PM |
#62 |
 -
I read that speech. It's part of what frightens me. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:43 PM |
#65 |
-
The evil of two lessers = "You won't get a better deal from my opponent, trust me." |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:46 PM |
#98 |
-
None of the 3 candidates have the courage to be anti-war. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Mar-30-08 07:48 PM |
#67 |
 -
Well, I think that there are just struggles but then again I'm not a pacifist. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 07:56 PM |
#73 |
-
I agree with the EZLN's struggle. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Mar-30-08 08:17 PM |
#80 |
-
I don't think that they would've gotten anywhere without pushing into the cities of Chiapas. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 08:29 PM |
#82 |
-
You forgot "People who don't demonize GHWB, Reagan, and JFK are evil". |
boppers |
Mar-30-08 07:55 PM |
#72 |
 -
Yes that makes you sound really 'grown up.' Do you also criticize people for 'demonizing' GWB? |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 08:08 PM |
#78 |
-
Oh, I get your style of invective. |
boppers |
Mar-30-08 09:23 PM |
#93 |
-
Wow... OK |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:52 PM |
#100 |
-
Trying to reduce a few hundred thousand incidents into a few paragraphs is never easy. |
boppers |
Mar-30-08 10:57 PM |
#105 |
-
JFK tried to ratchet down Vietnam, GHWB pulled out of Iraq, Reagan ended the cold war. |
dailykoff |
Mar-30-08 08:00 PM |
#75 |
 -
At last, a "realistic" defense of Obama's remarks |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:55 PM |
#101 |
-
Response: |
Political Heretic |
Mar-30-08 08:03 PM |
#76 |
-
Here' s how I read it... |
stillcool47 |
Mar-30-08 08:08 PM |
#77 |
 -
I agree with some of his statements, but others give me pause. |
readmoreoften |
Mar-30-08 08:14 PM |
#79 |
-
I believe all wars in the middle-east .. |
stillcool47 |
Mar-30-08 09:05 PM |
#86 |
-
And that is realist. By siding with Reagan/Bush on realism, hes saying he doesnt mind resource wars |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:50 PM |
#99 |
-
I don't know that there has .. |
stillcool47 |
Mar-30-08 10:50 PM |
#104 |
-
hes anti dumb war. not war in general. - nt |
goletian |
Mar-30-08 08:44 PM |
#83 |
-
This poll breakdown saddens me. DU is "showing their ass" as my grandma would say |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-30-08 09:05 PM |
#85 |
-
Other: |
LWolf |
Mar-30-08 09:10 PM |
#87 |
-
Here's how Tom Hayden, an Obama supporter, puts it: |
dailykoff |
Mar-30-08 09:13 PM |
#90 |
 -
at least old tom has`t lost his reasoning |
madrchsod |
Mar-30-08 10:09 PM |
#102 |
-
Obama's not antiwar. He's anti-stupid-war. |
Occam Bandage |
Mar-30-08 10:12 PM |
#103 |