Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
|
if he came to that conclusion, he's probably ALSO come to the conclusion that Hillary's remaining in a race she can't win, because of ego and ambition, is not a good thing and only DAMAGES the cances of a Democrat winning in November. And there's a hierarchy of loyalty, as noted above; loyalty to party and country should trump personal loyalty. (And it's your conception of loyalty I'm calling twisted, because the idea that someone who was selected to do a job, and did it competently and well, owes anything beyond that is just a bit silly.)
|
| -Even if Edwards (the person I voted for), ends up |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 08:43 PM |
#0 |
-
You don't support Richardson's loyalty to his party? |
YDogg |
Mar-24-08 08:45 PM |
#1 |
 -
That's not the loyalty I'm referring to, unfortunately. |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 08:53 PM |
#7 |
-
I'd take loyalty to the principles of the Democratic Party, over those to an indiviual any day |
Drachasor |
Mar-24-08 09:20 PM |
# |
-
He is loyal to the right thing our nation, It sounds like cronyism is important to you |
Johnny__Motown |
Mar-24-08 08:45 PM |
#2 |
 -
You call it cronyism. I call it loyalty. |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 08:51 PM |
#3 |
-
Bush values loyalty as well - explains many of his appointments. |
Umbram |
Mar-24-08 08:52 PM |
#5 |
 -
Bingo. n/t |
ingac70 |
Mar-24-08 08:53 PM |
#9 |
-
That's bullshit... |
ingac70 |
Mar-24-08 08:53 PM |
#8 |
 -
He would be a nobody without them. A big zero without all |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 08:56 PM |
#10 |
-
He was just a lucky token... |
ingac70 |
Mar-24-08 09:02 PM |
#18 |
 -
See, you have the same attitude as Mr. Richardson. |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:04 PM |
#22 |
-
Yes, let's be honest. Richardson was qualified for the positions he earned. Clinton owes him |
Johnny__Motown |
Mar-24-08 09:02 PM |
#19 |
-
Do you know that good help is hard to find in the |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:06 PM |
#24 |
-
So that makes him beholden to the Clintons for the rest of his life? |
gmudem |
Mar-24-08 09:15 PM |
#29 |
-
What a drunken response. |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:23 PM |
#37 |
-
I guess I'm not surprised you don't understand. |
gmudem |
Mar-24-08 10:27 PM |
#62 |
-
Why don't you just admit you have an intense hatred |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 10:42 PM |
#66 |
-
Sure whatever. |
gmudem |
Mar-24-08 10:49 PM |
#70 |
-
By "sure whatever," is that a concession? |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 11:00 PM |
#72 |
-
Do you actually know the Clintons? Just curious. By the way you're talking... |
Ned_Devine |
Mar-24-08 09:00 PM |
# |
 -
I don't know the Clintons. I only know that they hired |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:02 PM |
#21 |
-
The word loyalty always spooks me |
Ned_Devine |
Mar-24-08 09:06 PM |
#23 |
-
Really? You don't expect your significant other to be loyal |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:12 PM |
#28 |
-
Please don't preach to me |
Ned_Devine |
Mar-24-08 09:44 PM |
#46 |
-
Well you certainly weren't expecting a gentle, cuddly |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:59 PM |
#53 |
-
You read a lot more than I wrote, but... |
Ned_Devine |
Mar-24-08 10:09 PM |
#59 |
-
Yea, discussing differences is so scary. |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 11:02 PM |
#73 |
-
Maybe he can't get over the fact that more Latinos |
desi |
Mar-24-08 09:00 PM |
#16 |
-
That is pure BS, Richardson earned those positions, Bill Clinton owes Richardson for having served |
Johnny__Motown |
Mar-24-08 09:01 PM |
#17 |
-
Loyalty to the Democratic party is more important... |
ingac70 |
Mar-24-08 08:52 PM |
# |
-
I think Richardson is a weasel because he wouldn't allow... |
Zookeeper |
Mar-24-08 08:52 PM |
#4 |
 -
Supreme Court. |
Steve_DeShazer |
Mar-24-08 08:58 PM |
#12 |
-
The Supreme Court didn't select Bush in 2004. |
Zookeeper |
Mar-24-08 09:02 PM |
#20 |
-
I'm referring to the fact that Obama, Bill R or no Bill R, |
Steve_DeShazer |
Mar-24-08 09:16 PM |
#30 |
-
Yeah, I figured that out right after I posted. |
Zookeeper |
Mar-24-08 09:23 PM |
#38 |
-
That'll work. |
Steve_DeShazer |
Mar-24-08 09:27 PM |
#40 |
-
Loyalty to what? |
BuyingThyme |
Mar-24-08 08:53 PM |
#6 |
 -
No. Not necessarily. |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:00 PM |
#15 |
-
So 4 of his 23 years of public service were spent in Clinton's cabinet |
EmperorHasNoClothes |
Mar-24-08 08:58 PM |
#11 |
 -
And yet every shred of "experience" he attempted to |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:16 PM |
#31 |
-
And yet his status as a superdelegate has nothing whatsoever to do with the Clintons |
EmperorHasNoClothes |
Mar-24-08 09:18 PM |
#32 |
-
Diplomacy this, diplomacy that, if been here, I've been there. |
MagickMuffin |
Mar-25-08 12:01 AM |
#76 |
-
so if someone hires you and you do a good job there on your own merit, |
FLDem5 |
Mar-24-08 08:59 PM |
#13 |
 -
Of course not...not if something major occurs.... |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:19 PM |
#33 |
-
You're confusing loyalty with nepotism |
Wolsh |
Mar-24-08 08:59 PM |
#14 |
 -
No I'm not confusing it. All I know is if someone had |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:20 PM |
#34 |
-
lol, youre messed up in the head. n/t |
goletian |
Mar-24-08 09:07 PM |
#25 |
-
I'm loyal to my friends, but some of them I wouldn't recommend professionally |
berni_mccoy |
Mar-24-08 09:08 PM |
#26 |
-
You don't care about Integrity I guess? |
GoPsUx |
Mar-24-08 09:11 PM |
#27 |
-
He can do math |
lynyrd_skynyrd |
Mar-24-08 09:22 PM |
#35 |
-
He was loyal |
adoraz |
Mar-24-08 09:22 PM |
#36 |
-
Richardson is a weasel. |
Tennessee Gal |
Mar-24-08 09:23 PM |
#39 |
 -
A Judas, right? |
Blue-Jay |
Mar-24-08 09:28 PM |
#41 |
-
Edwards was my favorite... |
MrsGrumpy |
Mar-24-08 09:28 PM |
#42 |
 -
They're good people....and I adore Elizabeth also. |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:38 PM |
#44 |
-
I wish she would have run. |
MrsGrumpy |
Mar-24-08 09:39 PM |
#45 |
-
Love you more |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 09:50 PM |
#50 |
-
Love you most... |
MrsGrumpy |
Mar-24-08 09:52 PM |
#51 |
-
Speaking of the kids, please promise me you guys will |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 10:02 PM |
#55 |
-
They signed Cabrera to 8 years today. |
MrsGrumpy |
Mar-24-08 10:04 PM |
#56 |
-
Yay. |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 10:09 PM |
#58 |
-
Edwards will endorse Obama, Hillary is purposely trying to undermine him for 2012 |
Pisces |
Mar-24-08 09:36 PM |
#43 |
-
Blind loyalty is not an admirable thing. |
Spider Jerusalem |
Mar-24-08 09:46 PM |
#47 |
 -
Actually, I'm not in favor of blind loyalty. That would |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 10:06 PM |
#57 |
-
It certainly sounds like you favour it. |
Spider Jerusalem |
Mar-24-08 10:12 PM |
#60 |
-
Ah, I think you hit on some key words. He came to the |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 10:18 PM |
#61 |
-
Yes, BUT... |
Spider Jerusalem |
Mar-24-08 10:28 PM |
#63 |
-
I think he wants a job. That's the bottom line......and if that's |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 10:36 PM |
#64 |
-
And maybe he wants a Democrat to win in November... |
Spider Jerusalem |
Mar-24-08 10:40 PM |
#65 |
-
Well, we're starting to side-step into a completely |
cboy4 |
Mar-24-08 10:46 PM |
#69 |
-
Richardson placed loyalty to his country and party above loyalty to Bill and Hillary..... |
scheming daemons |
Mar-24-08 09:48 PM |
#48 |
 -
A patriot because he endorsed Obama, give me a break!!!! |
Beacool |
Mar-24-08 10:50 PM |
#71 |
-
Richardson is a good man |
Upton |
Mar-24-08 09:49 PM |
#49 |
-
So Say He Didn't Agree With |
otohara |
Mar-24-08 09:57 PM |
#52 |
-
Screw that! Public servants should be loyal to the public. |
Turn CO Blue |
Mar-24-08 09:59 PM |
#54 |
-
CRONYISM! FUCK YEAH! |
anonymous171 |
Mar-24-08 10:43 PM |
#67 |
 -
CAP LOCK! FUCK YEAH! |
cboy4 |
Mar-25-08 02:06 AM |
#77 |
-
Yep, weasel is the word.................... |
Beacool |
Mar-24-08 10:44 PM |
#68 |
-
If folks place loyalty in someone without question. It is just as dangerous as when Bushies did it. |
cooolandrew |
Mar-24-08 11:22 PM |
#74 |
-
Country, Party, Politician. |
baldguy |
Mar-24-08 11:33 PM |
#75 |