Reply #34: Regardless of who wins,

[metalluk]

their victory could be either tainted or not tainted. It's up to the Party leaders to ensure that the process is fair to both candidates and as much above reproach as possible.

Suppose Obama wins, but only because either Michigan or Florida was unable to pull off a re-do. How do you suppose Clinton supporters will feel about that? Suppose Obama wins, but only because of shady dealings in the Texas caucuses.

The superdelegates and how they split their vote is only one of several issues that could be experienced as resulting in a tainted outcome by one side or the other. There is no reason, however, that the superdelegates should not vote for the person they believe will make the best candidate.

The best bet for the Democrats is a negotiated solution during the weeks after the last primary and before the beginning of the convention. If the decision is not made before the convention, it is unlikely that the losing side will have accepted their loss or the process issues before the convention ends, and the rancor will be televised for all to see.

For me personally, the whole thing is a bit simpler. If Clinton emerges as the nominee I will not only support her but will actively work on her campaign. If Obama emerges as the nominee, I will not be voting for the Democrat come November.