You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: "BRIEFING" from Clinton, no. But wink-wink NAFTA "ASSURANCES" from HRC: YES [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. "BRIEFING" from Clinton, no. But wink-wink NAFTA "ASSURANCES" from HRC: YES
You posted a link that that does not support the gravamen of your argument. Read down:

"The revelations about Brodie's conversation with the television news station have left a key unanswered question that holds some implications for the U.S. election.

Sources who overheard that conversation say he specifically mentioned that Canadian diplomats did get ASSURANCES from the Clinton camp - and he never raised Obama's name."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hillary Clinton's Wink-Wink on NAFTA to Canada That She Blamed on Obama. AtomicKitten  Mar-10-08 10:35 PM   #0 
  - No comment? That figures.  AtomicKitten   Mar-10-08 10:54 PM   #1 
  - We're just digesting it, dear.  Spiffarino   Mar-10-08 11:07 PM   #4 
  - it's one of the revelations that makes one go hmmmmmmmmmm  AtomicKitten   Mar-10-08 11:08 PM   #6 
  - sd  hueyshort   Mar-10-08 11:19 PM   #9 
  - Total LIE - This LINK Proves it  hueyshort   Mar-10-08 11:22 PM   #12 
     - So you didn't read down the article...  Spiffarino   Mar-10-08 11:28 PM   #15 
     - "BRIEFING" from Clinton, no. But wink-wink NAFTA "ASSURANCES" from HRC: YES  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-10-08 11:31 PM   #17 
        - JINX!  Spiffarino   Mar-10-08 11:38 PM   #23 
  - who do  hueyshort   Mar-10-08 11:21 PM   #11 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-10-08 11:20 PM   #10 
  - "supposedly talked about Clinton staff back-dooring on NAFTA "  niceypoo   Mar-10-08 11:34 PM   #20 
  - Don't you just wonder whether Bill Clinton made any calls to Canada ten days ago or so?  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-10-08 11:04 PM   #2 
  - I find the sustained gratuitous spinning of this story  AtomicKitten   Mar-10-08 11:07 PM   #5 
     - The timing as well as the erroneous content of the leaked Canadian memo are quite  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-10-08 11:15 PM   #8 
        - there's no conicidence in politics  AtomicKitten   Mar-10-08 11:25 PM   #14 
  - Memo.  anamandujano   Mar-10-08 11:04 PM   #3 
  - PMO: Canadian officials only got briefing from Obama campaign - not Clinton:  wlucinda   Mar-10-08 11:14 PM   #7 
  - Wrong. The genesis was ClintonCo and for some mysterious reason the story was changed.  AtomicKitten   Mar-10-08 11:23 PM   #13 
  - I am sending this thread to Ohio newspapers  hueyshort   Mar-10-08 11:29 PM   #16 
  - So why did Brodie specifically mention Clinton?  Spiffarino   Mar-10-08 11:35 PM   #21 
  - "BRIEFING", no. Wink-Wink NAFTA "ASSURANCES" from HRC YES, acc 2 YOUR LINK:  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-10-08 11:45 PM   #24 
  - link -- apparently this is a dupe  AtomicKitten   Mar-10-08 11:31 PM   #18 
  - Someone the other day posted something proving it wasn't Clinton.  Auntie Bush   Mar-10-08 11:33 PM   #19 
  - And you are too blind to see that this is a political trick by HRC that has been exposed.  AtomicKitten   Mar-10-08 11:35 PM   #22 
     - Bogus ... see below n/t  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-10-08 11:59 PM   #26 
        - bogus ... see below  Lord Helmet   Mar-11-08 12:00 AM   #28 
  - No one commented because it's an already...  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-10-08 11:57 PM   #25 
  - and this debunks your pile of bs so Obama wins  Lord Helmet   Mar-10-08 11:59 PM   #27 
     - WRONG AGAIN!!  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-11-08 12:12 AM   #29 
     - keep pumping out those lies  Lord Helmet   Mar-11-08 12:15 AM   #30 
        - Oh yeah ... I went to Canada and wrote the articles.  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-11-08 12:32 AM   #32 
           - you first (look below)  Lord Helmet   Mar-11-08 12:33 AM   #33 
     - "BRIEFING", no. Wink-wink NAFTA "ASSURANCES", YES, according to YOUR POST"  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-11-08 12:31 AM   #31 
        - well ... since I have poster 17 on ignore ...  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-11-08 12:35 AM   #34 
        - Surely you still can read your own post #25. whose snip from globeandmail includes:  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-11-08 12:41 AM   #35 
           - Now who's parsing? Surely you read right below that ...  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-11-08 12:46 AM   #38 
              - A memo for whose misleading and erroneous pre-Ohio statements about Goolsbee  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-11-08 12:49 AM   #39 
                 - They apologized that it was leaked.  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-11-08 01:14 AM   #43 
        - Bad eyes? Maybe THIS will help  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-11-08 12:42 AM   #36 
           - The direct quote from Buckler is about BRIEFINGS, not ASSURANCES.  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-11-08 12:46 AM   #37 
              - Where is it documented that Buckler, the spokeswoman  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-11-08 12:52 AM   #40 
                 - Exactly, where? So she's no authority on whether or not Brodie told CTV HRC, not Obama,  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-11-08 01:00 AM   #41 
                    - Apparently the PM's office looked into the statement...  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-11-08 01:12 AM   #42 
                       - Your case rests on the investigation of the right-wing Harper PMO by itself? Goodnight.  ProgressiveEconomist   Mar-11-08 01:17 AM   #44 
                          - And YOUR case rests on ONE remark made by ONE man ...  SaveOurDemocracy   Mar-11-08 01:30 AM   #45 
  - Obama's been desperately spreading this lie. He got caught and discredited.  Yossariant   Mar-11-08 01:30 AM   #46 
     - the only thing interesting here at DU anymore is just how pathetic Clinton supporters are getting  AtomicKitten   Mar-11-08 01:36 AM   #47 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC