mculator
(658 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| -If we need the president with the MOST political experience |
Rosemary2205 |
Mar-09-08 03:30 PM |
#0 |
-
That's why Hillary latest manuevers don't make any sense. |
anonymous171 |
Mar-09-08 03:30 PM |
#1 |
 -
Maybe she's being sexist? |
HypnoToad |
Mar-09-08 03:31 PM |
#2 |
 -
Oh, they make perfect sense. |
EmperorHasNoClothes |
Mar-09-08 03:31 PM |
#3 |
 -
she appears to be out of control at times |
CountAllVotes |
Mar-09-08 03:36 PM |
#7 |
 -
hilary isn't about "making sense" hilary |
zidzi |
Mar-09-08 05:01 PM |
#38 |
-
Dick Cheney can still run |
Ichingcarpenter |
Mar-09-08 03:32 PM |
#4 |
-
a democrat with experience. |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 03:33 PM |
#5 |
-
Hey, maybe we can nominate Robert Byrd or Dan Inouye! |
dkf |
Mar-09-08 03:33 PM |
#6 |
-
doesn't Al Gore trump John McBush? |
tibbiit |
Mar-09-08 03:43 PM |
#8 |
 -
Last time I looked |
Rosemary2205 |
Mar-09-08 03:45 PM |
#9 |
-
for his personal sake (al gore) |
tibbiit |
Mar-09-08 03:52 PM |
#16 |
-
Experience |
malletgirl02 |
Mar-09-08 03:45 PM |
#10 |
 -
Exactly. nt |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 03:47 PM |
#13 |
-
to the extent "experience" matters to me, I think of it as "enough" thing, not the "most" |
ctaylors6 |
Mar-09-08 03:46 PM |
#11 |
-
And if we are going by experience, after McCain |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 03:47 PM |
#12 |
 -
Obama has 2 years at the national level. Not nearly enough. nt |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 03:48 PM |
#14 |
-
Ha...riiiiiiiiiiiiiight. |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 03:51 PM |
#15 |
 -
What do you mean..."riiiiight"? Do you know of some stealth federal level office |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 03:55 PM |
#18 |
-
He's got 10 years in elected office. |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 03:56 PM |
#19 |
-
The state senate is NOT an executive office. |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 04:00 PM |
#20 |
-
Riiiiiiiight |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 04:02 PM |
#21 |
 -
Again, he has NO executive experience. None. |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 04:05 PM |
#22 |
-
ROFL |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 04:12 PM |
#24 |
 -
There's no reason to think the man can govern effectively. |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 04:29 PM |
#26 |
-
Are you joking? |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 04:32 PM |
#27 |
-
Obama promised to stand against the war, but has instead voted to |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 04:36 PM |
#29 |
-
And as against the war as I am |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 04:42 PM |
#30 |
 -
He came out against the war when it was of no consequence to him politically-- |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 04:43 PM |
#31 |
-
oh stop |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 04:47 PM |
#32 |
 -
Like I said...lacking in courage. nt |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 04:49 PM |
#33 |
-
And like I said |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 04:51 PM |
#34 |
-
At least she's met world leaders and their wives. More than Obama can claim. nt |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 04:53 PM |
#35 |
-
yes, and served them tea...so what |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 04:55 PM |
#36 |
-
Obama is a blank slate. Who avoids controversial votes |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:00 PM |
#37 |
-
10 years is not a blank slate. |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 05:04 PM |
#39 |
-
Two years at the federal level. Most of that time spent campaigning |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:10 PM |
#42 |
-
You can say it over and over again |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 05:13 PM |
#45 |
-
Speaking is one thing. Voting is what matters. nt |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:14 PM |
#46 |
-
You are correct |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 05:16 PM |
#47 |
-
And Obama voted to keep us there, |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:21 PM |
#50 |
-
No, Obama voted to continue funding the troops |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 05:36 PM |
#51 |
-
I want them to come home. I want people who claim to oppose this war |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:37 PM |
#52 |
-
Voting not to fund the war is not going to bring them |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 05:43 PM |
#55 |
-
It's disastrous either way. It's time for the troops to come home. nt |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:45 PM |
#56 |
-
I agree, but we need to get them out safely. |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 05:47 PM |
#57 |
-
Where have I shown support for her? I see them both as weak candidates. |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:50 PM |
#58 |
-
Listen, I voted for kucinich in the 2004 primaries |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 05:53 PM |
#59 |
-
Ummm....Obama didn't vote against Kyl-Lieberman. |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:56 PM |
#60 |
-
OK, well he certainly didnt vote for it. |
yourguide |
Mar-09-08 05:59 PM |
#61 |
-
That is the LAMEST reasoning I've seen |
Paint It Black |
Mar-09-08 05:18 PM |
#49 |
 -
If he opposed the war, as he claimed (when it was easy--in the state Senate), |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:40 PM |
#54 |
-
Someone else covered that in this thread |
Paint It Black |
Mar-09-08 07:31 PM |
#65 |
-
And your candidate has done what? Always been a Hawk? |
skater314159 |
Mar-09-08 06:10 PM |
#64 |
-
Not a Hillary supporter. Before the media and the centrists told us all otherwise, |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 10:06 PM |
#66 |
-
I am against the war, but our soldiers and support staff need equip. |
skater314159 |
Mar-09-08 06:09 PM |
#63 |
-
HUH??? |
Rosemary2205 |
Mar-09-08 04:12 PM |
#25 |
-
Obama |
BumRushDaShow |
Mar-09-08 05:38 PM |
#53 |
-
By your logic, Abraham Lincoln wasn't qualified either |
Paint It Black |
Mar-09-08 05:10 PM |
#41 |
-
Yes, I still say Obama is not qualified. nt |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:11 PM |
#43 |
-
And doesn't he belong to some kind of screwed up denomination? |
theredpen |
Mar-09-08 06:00 PM |
#62 |
-
She wants McCain to win so she can run again in 2012, that is the only explanation |
Johnny__Motown |
Mar-09-08 03:52 PM |
#17 |
-
Hillary Clinton. |
mculator |
Mar-09-08 04:05 PM |
#23 |
-
that would be al gore instead of the war supporting obama and clinton nt |
msongs |
Mar-09-08 04:35 PM |
#28 |
-
How about Robert Byrd? |
BigDaddy44 |
Mar-09-08 05:08 PM |
#40 |
 -
I'd feel better about Byrd. nt |
mycritters2 |
Mar-09-08 05:11 PM |
#44 |
-
wh said anything about political experience? |
bigtree |
Mar-09-08 05:16 PM |
#48 |