but if it were all true, why is she not winning? She had the advantage from the start. This fight shouldn't have gone on this long. She should have won a LONG time ago.
But she didn't because she had a bad strategy of only competing in a few states. If she were winning the number of delegates or the popular vote, I'd say she has a good argument but as of now she doesn't. She understood the process. I keep hearing about all this experience she has and how she's vetted. Then why couldn't she take on a freshman senator like Obama?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
