You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #100: How so? You should be sorry for your misstatements and irrelevant responses. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #89
100. How so? You should be sorry for your misstatements and irrelevant responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Canada: Telling Americans we have no right to know. Obama: Lesson 1, No Cheney Style meetings. LulaMay  Mar-05-08 09:06 PM   #0 
  - The Clinton campaign was first to contact Canada about NAFTA  DJ13   Mar-05-08 09:07 PM   #1 
  - Not claiming privacy. Not to say one thing publicly and another privately.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:10 PM   #3 
  - Obama's advisor didn't do that. That's been debunked. Sorry, no ammo here.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:13 PM   #5 
     - Fact is--both Canada and Obama were in FULL damage control yesterday.  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 09:36 PM   #30 
  - actually  leftofcool   Mar-05-08 09:15 PM   #7 
  - Please tell us the SECRET SOURCE  UALRBSofL   Mar-05-08 09:16 PM   #8 
     - Exactly.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:27 PM   #23 
  - yes, Obama owes Americans an apology for making deals behind our backs  amborin   Mar-05-08 09:08 PM   #2 
  - I think it is another example of his inexperience that causes poor knee jerk response  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:12 PM   #4 
  - Can you find me the quote where Obama said that Goulsbee DIDN'T  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:16 PM   #9 
     - Oh yes, it's all so complicated. His campaign flat out denied meeting with them period.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:24 PM   #18 
        - Find me a quote that specifies that once the media fingered Goulsbee  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:26 PM   #20 
           - Durbin flatly denied it on TV Monday. It's Goolsbee, though I like Ghoulsbee.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:31 PM   #27 
           - Denied that a meeting took place, or denied the substance or purpose  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:43 PM   #38 
              - Denied that a meeting took place.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:46 PM   #44 
                 - Well, I guess Durbin was wrong, but then, I don't see a link or a quote.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:46 PM   #46 
           - Here ya go.  Hoof Hearted   Mar-05-08 09:55 PM   #62 
              - Obama said that Goolsbee didn't meet with the Canadians to tell  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:00 PM   #73 
              - Thank you HH! When the facts are so well known, I don't always post a link.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:10 PM   #85 
  - Maybe that's because  tyne   Mar-05-08 09:15 PM   #6 
     - Yep, blame the Clintons  leftofcool   Mar-05-08 09:17 PM   #11 
     - This has nothing to do with ineptitude. This was an entirely fabricated hit job.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:18 PM   #15 
        - Even the Cnadian government doesn't deny the facts, but were angry the memo was leaked.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:52 PM   #57 
           - What facts? Goolsbee never said anything to them that was different  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:55 PM   #61 
              - That's not what the memo states. Were you there? The Canadians are doing classic damage control.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:22 PM   #96 
                 - The Embassy admits that Goolsbee's story is accurate. Sorry, toots.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:31 PM   #107 
     - what's rotten is Obama denied any meeting ever occurred, until confronted with the evidence  amborin   Mar-05-08 09:17 PM   #12 
        - He sure did.  leftofcool   Mar-05-08 09:17 PM   #13 
        - In the initial story, he didn't deny a meeting occurred, just doubted it, and  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:21 PM   #16 
           - ha---the RW Canada gov got caught--pub. relations is to go into damage control mode--get it!!  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 09:40 PM   #34 
  - Much ado about nothing  StClone   Mar-05-08 09:16 PM   #10 
  - Fact: Obama denied any meeting happened, until the evidence was in his face  amborin   Mar-05-08 09:18 PM   #14 
     - You have your facts 100% wrong. The EMBASSY denied that  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:24 PM   #17 
        - No. His campaign denied it repeatedly. Durbin denied it flat out on TV Monday.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:26 PM   #19 
        - I don't care what Durbin said. Tell me where Obama lied about Goulsbee.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:27 PM   #22 
           - You should care. He was speaking on Obama's behalf for the campaign. and  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:37 PM   #31 
              - His camp "doubted" the initial meeting, in the WRONG first version of the  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:41 PM   # 
                 - So, none of his advisors knows what they're doing, or what is going on? How is this an answer?  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:44 PM   #39 
                    - NONE of them, or one advisor that discussed something? That's a pretty  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:47 PM   #48 
        - PS- That's what I want, a president who claims to be unaware of what his staff is doing  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:26 PM   #21 
           - His advisor was CONTACTED, not the other way around. I guess  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:30 PM   #24 
           - and held a meeting without Obama approving it or knowing about it? How comforting.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:40 PM   #33 
           - That's all ya got left, now, huh? Hate to see a good scandal crumble, don't ya?  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:45 PM   #41 
           - What? What is "all ya got left?" Your statement doesn't even make sense.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:50 PM   #52 
              - You thought you had something, and it crumbled to dust. Hee!  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:51 PM   #55 
                 - No, you went around in circles over whether Obama denied it, or his advisor did it, or...?  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:56 PM   #65 
                 - The story is nothing. The main point of it, Obama lying about NAFTA, is debunked.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:01 PM   #77 
                    - 1. The meeting and remarks were not debunked 2. His lying about the meeting is the main point.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:13 PM   #87 
                       - He did not lie. It was Hillary's campaign that lied. Sorry.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:14 PM   #89 
                          - How so? You should be sorry for your misstatements and irrelevant responses.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:28 PM   #100 
                             - Your entire post is bogus. Hillary is the one with the NAFTA problem now.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:30 PM   #103 
                 - fact: Obama had denied there was any meeting, until confronted with evidence  amborin   Mar-05-08 10:00 PM   #74 
                    - He told the truth. 'Nuff said. He denied that one of his advisors  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:03 PM   #79 
                       - he was wishy washy and reporters and OHIO unions knew that. Hense the lose in OHIO  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 10:19 PM   #93 
                          - That is very spot on...contributing to his loss. Ohioans know the score. They didn't appreciate it.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:29 PM   #101 
                             - Hillary lied to Ohio. And the rest of the country will find out.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:30 PM   #105 
           - Once again Bill was doing his own thing  StClone   Mar-05-08 09:46 PM   #45 
           - Obama's embassador contacted the Chicago office of Canada  ada chupitos perez   Mar-05-08 09:45 PM   # 
              - Uh, no. Unless you can find me a link that says Goolsbee contacted  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:45 PM   #43 
           - Tell that to Bill  StClone   Mar-05-08 09:31 PM   #25 
           - Sounds like Bush doesn't it?  leftofcool   Mar-05-08 09:31 PM   #26 
              - Oh for Chrissakes  StClone   Mar-05-08 09:32 PM   #28 
              - Yes. His responses in situations like this are troublesome.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:35 PM   #29 
                 - Canda was parsing words yest. and along with Obama were in FULL damage cont. mode!!  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 09:38 PM   #32 
                    - Mutual damage control....made them both look very bad.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:41 PM   # 
                       - Obama was supposed to answer questions  StClone   Mar-05-08 09:44 PM   #40 
                       - Waiting to hear all about Hillary and the Canadians, now that Obama's  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:49 PM   #49 
                       - HA HA---that is the point--BO tried to 'esplan' but he just kept digging a hole!  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 09:53 PM   #58 
                       - yes--I heard BO press conf. He came across lame.  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 09:49 PM   #50 
                          - Sun Times reporters came to Texas because he'd evaded their questions for weeks.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:58 PM   #70 
                             - evade, squirm, run off in a huff  amborin   Mar-05-08 10:02 PM   #78 
                                - He turned and quickly walked away. It shows both inexperience and poor reaction  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:16 PM   #91 
  - An apology is in order, as is an explanation.  Hoof Hearted   Mar-05-08 09:41 PM   #35 
  - I'm waiting for Hillary to explain why she told the Canadians not to worry about NAFTA.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:50 PM   #51 
  - Nice attempt to change the subject. The first tactic of all high-school debate teams.  Hoof Hearted   Mar-05-08 09:57 PM   #68 
     - :)  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:59 PM   #71 
     - Why did Hillary lie about NAFTA? Because we know Obama didn't.  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:03 PM   #80 
        - please do not include me in your "we". and Where is this 'lie" you claim HRC did?  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 10:17 PM   #92 
        - You are really grasping at straws now, trying to change the charge to her, and misstate the facts.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:24 PM   #97 
        - Did you see the link?  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:26 PM   #99 
           - What in the world are you talking about?  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:33 PM   #109 
              - This thread--  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:36 PM   #112 
                 - Please see my response to this below.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 11:01 PM   #121 
        - Repetition of the same sub-level tactics will not produce a new result,  Hoof Hearted   Mar-05-08 11:59 PM   #125 
  - I think so too, from Hillary:  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 09:53 PM   #59 
  - Where is Hillary's tax return?  ProSense   Mar-05-08 09:41 PM   #36 
  - Avoid the question, change the subject....zero points.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:42 PM   #37 
  - No, the OP is stupid, the story is bogus, and Harper is investigating in damage control mode  ProSense   Mar-05-08 09:45 PM   #42 
     - The Canadian government responds to a bogus story? Now that's stupid.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 09:47 PM   #47 
        - See, stupid. The Canadian government is investigating the source of the bogus story.  ProSense   Mar-05-08 09:50 PM   #53 
           - Don't continue to call names or I won't respond. The C governement is investigating WHO 'leaked'  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:01 PM   #76 
           - None of this matters the story is bogus. Do you think Obama is opposed to free trade?  ProSense   Mar-05-08 10:12 PM   #86 
           - Your behavior wouldn't be tolerated in any debate, you know?  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:05 PM   #81 
              - Let me make it into a full sentence: "See, this is stupid."  ProSense   Mar-05-08 10:13 PM   #88 
                 - In a debate you score zero points with simple name calling and rude behavior. I won't reply again.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:19 PM   #94 
                    - I repeat the OP is stupid, the article is bogus. I don't care about your point system. n/t  ProSense   Mar-05-08 10:31 PM   #106 
  - ROVE IS HERE again FOLKS---changing the subject . Watch out. ROVE IS ON THIS THREAD!!  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 09:51 PM   #56 
     - Here:  ProSense   Mar-05-08 09:55 PM   #63 
        - ROVE is up to his tricks again. ALL STAY AWAY---STINKY  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 09:57 PM   #67 
           - Yeah, Hillary's adopted his tactics and landed  ProSense   Mar-05-08 10:00 PM   #75 
              - POT MEET KETTLE  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 10:20 PM   #95 
                 - Are you saying I'm the same as Hillary when it comes to Rove?  ProSense   Mar-05-08 10:32 PM   #108 
  - I think you've squeezed all the juice out of that bullshit.  AtomicKitten   Mar-05-08 09:50 PM   #54 
  - yup: BO ended up looking like BS  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 09:54 PM   #60 
     - I guess you missed this: "A Hollow Victory Based on a Lie"  AtomicKitten   Mar-05-08 09:56 PM   #66 
        - Hillary 3:1 yesterday. She has the MOJO~~ go Hillary.  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 09:58 PM   #69 
           - Moved her solidly into second place ... Wait! Isn't that where she started?  AtomicKitten   Mar-05-08 09:59 PM   #72 
           - The momentum is hers...and the powers that be can't stand that they don't bring her down.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:06 PM   #82 
              - yup  rodeodance   Mar-05-08 10:24 PM   #98 
              - She wins a canned ham for coming in second.  AtomicKitten   Mar-05-08 10:29 PM   #102 
                 - I thought 2nd place prize was a gift certificate for a free small coke at Wendy's?  Lord Helmet   Mar-05-08 10:57 PM   #119 
  - I don't think any invasions are planned for oil.  mmonk   Mar-05-08 09:56 PM   #64 
  - Could you explain what you're saying more?  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:07 PM   #83 
     - Easy. Comparing that with the Cheney Energy Task Force is a stretch  mmonk   Mar-05-08 10:33 PM   #110 
        - The comparison was made about the secrecy and denials, thougn I do believe economic policy is as  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:56 PM   #117 
        - Obama is running on a platform of no more back room politics, ie: Bush & Cheney secrecy.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:59 PM   #120 
  - Hillary supporters lecturing on openness - you people become more Orwellian by the minute. -nt  NMMatt   Mar-05-08 10:09 PM   #84 
  - Did you have a point or reply to the facts? What does "you people" mean?  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:15 PM   #90 
     - Supporters of the health care task force despot lecturing others about openness  NMMatt   Mar-05-08 10:30 PM   #104 
        - Changing the topic, avoiding an answer, calling names, don't speak anything to the question.  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:38 PM   #114 
  - So what's the truth here??  kentuck   Mar-05-08 10:35 PM   #111 
     - Hillary did--the media decided to go after Obama, though--  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:37 PM   #113 
     - This article confirms that CTV reported the Obama campaign made innappropriate remarks, and  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:53 PM   #116 
        - LOL! Nice spin. The Canadian government has confirmed Obama's  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 10:56 PM   #118 
           - No, the CAN government has said it was angry about the memo being 'leaked'  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 11:06 PM   #122 
              - They apologized for mischaracterizing Goolsbee's remarks and confirmed  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 11:10 PM   #124 
     - My point is that he denied the meeting, and the CAN government telling us we have no right to know  LulaMay   Mar-05-08 10:43 PM   #115 
        - He doubted the bogus meeting that CTV talked about--when he got the facts in  wienerdoggie   Mar-05-08 11:09 PM   #123 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC