Genevieve
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-05-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| -Obama is winning the Texas Caucus --- so, |
Genevieve |
Mar-05-08 05:29 PM |
#0 |
 -
Since delegate counts are what gets the nom... |
ingac70 |
Mar-05-08 05:30 PM |
#1 |
 -
I see that you, too, are ignorant of Texas's caucus process. |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-05-08 05:31 PM |
#4 |
| -
I live in Texas and participated in the caucus last night - your description is inaccurate |
powergirl |
Mar-05-08 05:44 PM |
#18 |
| -
"We had 84 participants." LMAO |
anamandujano |
Mar-05-08 06:13 PM |
#24 |
| -
In my precinct yes (40 of them were Clinton folks) |
powergirl |
Mar-05-08 06:19 PM |
#27 |
 -
We had 2 person caucus here |
WolverineDG |
Mar-06-08 04:50 PM |
#74 |
| -
More than a million people participated in the TX caucuses. Hate to burst your bubble. |
jenmito |
Mar-05-08 06:24 PM |
#29 |
| -
Post #24 shows why Sen. Clinton had to apologize to the State of Mississippi |
powergirl |
Mar-05-08 06:33 PM |
#30 |
| -
She had to apologize to Mississippi?? |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-05-08 06:40 PM |
#32 |
| -
She did, she did - Can you believe it! |
powergirl |
Mar-05-08 06:50 PM |
#35 |
| -
Obama wouldn't get faced by Helmet Head. |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-05-08 06:59 PM |
#39 |
| -
Still Counting Votes in Texas, Obama May Officially Win Texas |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Mar-05-08 07:59 PM |
#51 |
| -
Hillary's campaign just reflects a non-progressive prejudice against the South ... |
earthlover |
Mar-05-08 07:09 PM |
#43 |
| -
You don't even merit a comment |
thevoiceofreason |
Mar-06-08 08:48 PM |
#81 |
| -
That should put an end to that... |
usregimechange |
Mar-05-08 07:14 PM |
#44 |
| -
I have aksed you to explain why CNN states: "67 [TX delegates] tied to March 4 caucuses" |
usregimechange |
Mar-05-08 06:37 PM |
#31 |
| -
Because Bill Clinton wanted it that way - ironic, isn't it? -nt |
NMMatt |
Mar-05-08 07:02 PM |
#40 |
| -
Because Bill Clinton wanted it that way - ironic, isn't it? -nt |
NMMatt |
Mar-05-08 07:02 PM |
#41 |
| -
Thank you |
Genevieve |
Mar-05-08 05:32 PM |
#7 |
| -
So you don't want honesty, just lies. You don't want to learn about the TX caucus process.... |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-05-08 05:33 PM |
#9 |
| -
If you're ignorant of Texas' caucus process, read this thread. |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-05-08 05:31 PM |
#2 |
| -
its all about delegates |
adoraz |
Mar-05-08 05:31 PM |
#5 |
| -
And? |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-05-08 05:32 PM |
#8 |
| -
read it. and? |
adoraz |
Mar-05-08 05:34 PM |
#11 |
| -
Maybe you could educate us instead of being snide? |
usregimechange |
Mar-05-08 05:41 PM |
#16 |
| -
I hope so -- can someone explain |
Genevieve |
Mar-05-08 05:31 PM |
#3 |
| -
I've explained twice already in this very short thread. |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-05-08 05:32 PM |
#6 |
| -
And an experienced Texan said you're inaccurate the very first time. |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-05-08 06:47 PM |
#34 |
| -
Pretty much. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Mar-05-08 05:34 PM |
#10 |
| -
Good! |
Genevieve |
Mar-05-08 05:36 PM |
#12 |
| -
Stick you fingers in your ears and whistle a little louder... |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-05-08 05:37 PM |
#13 |
| -
Bless your heart, Maddy McCall! |
Genevieve |
Mar-05-08 05:40 PM |
#15 |
| -
pfft. |
Spider Jerusalem |
Mar-05-08 05:49 PM |
#21 |
| -
Yup. It's another state that doesn't count. |
Major Hogwash |
Mar-05-08 05:40 PM |
#14 |
| -
Maddy- as I said |
adoraz |
Mar-05-08 05:43 PM |
#17 |
| -
I just turned in my official caucus materials about 2 hours ago |
powergirl |
Mar-05-08 05:48 PM |
#20 |
| -
You call her on her ignorance of Texas and she still continues. Talk about a clinton cult member! nt |
greguganus |
Mar-05-08 07:03 PM |
#42 |
| -
IF Obama wins the Caucus by more delegates than Clinton won in the Primary |
Tom Rinaldo |
Mar-05-08 05:45 PM |
#19 |
| -
Sen. Clinton embraced this Texas procedure |
powergirl |
Mar-05-08 06:07 PM |
#23 |
| -
Thanks, powergirl, for all your |
zidzi |
Mar-05-08 06:53 PM |
#37 |
| -
Bill Clinton went through the same damned procedure in Texas. Stop Whining |
cryingshame |
Mar-05-08 06:17 PM |
#25 |
| -
I'm not whining about the results |
Tom Rinaldo |
Mar-05-08 07:51 PM |
#46 |
| -
Don't see the sense in your "party insiders" theory |
AchtungToddler |
Mar-05-08 09:54 PM |
#67 |
| -
Don't mess with Texas bucko!!! |
IsItJustMe |
Mar-05-08 09:57 PM |
#68 |
| -
since Obama has won the endorsements of 67 out of the last 83 |
grantcart |
Mar-05-08 06:54 PM |
#38 |
| -
If Obama regains his momentum, you will be right |
Tom Rinaldo |
Mar-05-08 07:54 PM |
#49 |
| -
and the biggest note on that |
johnnydrama |
Mar-05-08 09:09 PM |
#56 |
| -
shall i get you a tissue? |
JackORoses |
Mar-06-08 05:44 PM |
#78 |
| -
Tom, I'm not a Clinton supporter but I appreciate your reasoned defense |
Leopolds Ghost |
Mar-07-08 12:30 AM |
#82 |
| -
I think so. |
Johnny Potpie |
Mar-05-08 05:49 PM |
#22 |
| -
Yay! Obama won because more of his supporters voted TWICE! WOOHOO! |
zlt234 |
Mar-05-08 06:17 PM |
#26 |
| -
Clinton's supporters voted twice as well |
powergirl |
Mar-05-08 06:40 PM |
#33 |
| -
That's fine, but that doesn't mean Obama won Texas. |
zlt234 |
Mar-05-08 09:41 PM |
#63 |
| -
CNN just reported over a MILLION people participated in the caucuses! And he's winning by 12% |
jenmito |
Mar-05-08 06:23 PM |
#28 |
| -
Yay!! |
Genevieve |
Mar-05-08 06:53 PM |
#36 |
| -
You're welcome! I'm happy, too! |
jenmito |
Mar-05-08 07:44 PM |
#45 |
| -
And 2.8 million participated in the primary. |
Zynx |
Mar-05-08 07:52 PM |
#48 |
| -
And they make up 2/3rds of the delegate total. |
jenmito |
Mar-05-08 07:58 PM |
#50 |
| -
So we're allowing the subset of the 2.8 million that had extra time on their hands |
Zynx |
Mar-05-08 09:36 PM |
#57 |
| -
Yup. Those are the rules. All parties knew them. |
jenmito |
Mar-05-08 09:51 PM |
#66 |
| -
It doesn't make it any less morally objectionable. |
Zynx |
Mar-06-08 10:50 AM |
#71 |
| -
Frankly, we who caucused invested more into the process |
AchtungToddler |
Mar-05-08 09:59 PM |
#70 |
| -
The idea that just because you have more time on a particular evening that your vote |
Zynx |
Mar-06-08 10:51 AM |
#72 |
| -
Everyone takes time out to vote. It's beyond moronic to infer that |
AchtungToddler |
Mar-06-08 04:43 PM |
#73 |
| -
Some only have 15 minutes to vote, like I did in Wisconsin. |
Zynx |
Mar-06-08 05:40 PM |
#75 |
| -
And one candidate benefits by this how? |
AchtungToddler |
Mar-06-08 08:26 PM |
#79 |
| -
Obama lost Texas by 100,000 votes. That's what I look at. |
Zynx |
Mar-05-08 07:51 PM |
#47 |
| -
LESS than 100,000. And as Mark Penn said, it's all about the delegates. |
jenmito |
Mar-05-08 08:01 PM |
#52 |
| -
For God's sake, has rounding become illegal? It was over 99,000. |
Zynx |
Mar-05-08 09:36 PM |
#58 |
| -
you do know that Popular vote is only tallied so that delegates can be awarded, don't you? |
JackORoses |
Mar-06-08 05:42 PM |
#77 |
| -
Delegates matter |
high density |
Mar-05-08 08:05 PM |
#53 |
| -
I bet Obama doesn't really care how that poster feels about delegates. |
jenmito |
Mar-05-08 08:27 PM |
#54 |
| -
I'll be pissed if delegate allocation rules negate the will of the people. |
Zynx |
Mar-05-08 09:36 PM |
#59 |
| -
Then whoever gets more pledged delegates should win at the convention instantly. |
PseudoIntellect |
Mar-05-08 09:42 PM |
#64 |
| -
And she lost by 12% in the caucuses |
thewiseguy |
Mar-05-08 09:39 PM |
#62 |
| -
Yes..... |
lmbradford |
Mar-05-08 08:30 PM |
#55 |
| -
If the current numbers hold, Obama wins more delegates from TX... |
Sir Jeffrey |
Mar-05-08 09:38 PM |
#60 |
| -
Yes and no |
NMMatt |
Mar-05-08 09:39 PM |
#61 |
| -
Not in a PR sense, no but in a real sense yes |
Altair |
Mar-05-08 09:42 PM |
#65 |
| -
my husband and i were on the 10 pm news while we were at the caucus last night |
seabeyond |
Mar-05-08 09:58 PM |
#69 |
| -
Yes. |
BringBigDogBack |
Mar-06-08 05:40 PM |
#76 |
| -
yup - it does |
sloppyjoe25s |
Mar-06-08 08:44 PM |
#80 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread