joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-05-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #47 |
| 49. Well they can table a vote at the DNC to seat them for him, so yeah. |
|
Obviously he and the other candidates were political opportunists by chosing not to be represented in those states.
|
| -Obama delegates cost 10251 votes, Clinton's cost 11152. |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:01 AM |
#0 |
-
No... |
ingac70 |
Mar-05-08 02:03 AM |
#1 |
 -
Florida Florida Florida |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:05 AM |
#2 |
-
Perhaps, but it never has... |
ingac70 |
Mar-05-08 02:08 AM |
#5 |
-
It stinks.....and caucuses should be stopped. |
LulaMay |
Mar-05-08 02:05 AM |
#3 |
-
It gets even worse. |
zlt234 |
Mar-05-08 02:07 AM |
#4 |
 -
that makes me sick |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:10 AM |
#6 |
 -
Individual state parties.... |
ingac70 |
Mar-05-08 02:12 AM |
#7 |
 -
The thing is, Idaho wasn't close. |
PseudoIntellect |
Mar-05-08 02:14 AM |
#10 |
  -
Exactly. That's the problem. |
zlt234 |
Mar-05-08 02:16 AM |
#12 |
 -
Right now, that would be Senator Obama. - n/t |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 02:20 AM |
#14 |
  -
Yup. I totally support democracy, even if my candidate doesn't win. n/t |
zlt234 |
Mar-05-08 02:22 AM |
#15 |
  -
Not if you count FL and MI |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-05-08 03:00 AM |
#38 |
 -
And even if you don't count FL and MI, she still gets less delegates per vote. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 03:20 AM |
#41 |
  -
But does she have the lead in the popular vote? |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 03:25 AM |
#43 |
 -
Even if she did she could have less delegates, don't ya get that? |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 03:29 AM |
#44 |
 -
Perspective: she has to have almost 1.4 million *more* votes than him to *tie* in delegates. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 03:34 AM |
#46 |
 -
No, she could have won in those places that Obama won |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 04:14 AM |
#52 |
 -
The math doesn't lie. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 04:29 AM |
#53 |
 -
No... |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 04:45 AM |
#54 |
 -
I expect the rules to be changed after this DNC. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 04:46 AM |
#55 |
 -
That will not be a consideration |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 04:53 AM |
#56 |
 -
Why wouldn't it be a "consideration"? Do you know the DNC process? Anything can be tabled. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 05:02 AM |
#57 |
 -
It won't be a consideration because Hillary won't win the majority |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 05:26 AM |
#59 |
 -
And how do you count the popular vote from Michigan |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 03:23 AM |
#42 |
 -
Exit polling, obviously. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 03:29 AM |
#45 |
 -
Obama got no votes in Michigan |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-05-08 03:35 AM |
#47 |
 -
Well they can table a vote at the DNC to seat them for him, so yeah. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 03:38 AM |
#49 |
 -
See, I knew that would be your answer. |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 03:59 AM |
#51 |
 -
And if Clinton was in Obama's spot |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-05-08 05:20 AM |
#58 |
 -
Well, in that case, |
PseudoIntellect |
Mar-05-08 02:22 AM |
#16 |
 -
Oh, and worse than that... |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 02:18 AM |
#13 |
-
Yeah, and I never said that was fair either. |
zlt234 |
Mar-05-08 02:25 AM |
#18 |
-
Those delegates are determined by individual votes.... 1000 people vote, 1 delegate |
Levgreee |
Mar-05-08 02:12 AM |
#8 |
 -
The problem is that delegates are worth more in different states. |
zlt234 |
Mar-05-08 02:14 AM |
#11 |
-
It's the same in the General Election, where we have an Electoral system. |
Levgreee |
Mar-05-08 02:32 AM |
#21 |
-
Yeah, and I think the electoral college should be abolished. So do many, many others. n/t |
zlt234 |
Mar-05-08 02:35 AM |
#24 |
-
DU was *created* because 2000 wasn't based on popular vote. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 02:41 AM |
#30 |
-
Good cause |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:45 AM |
#34 |
-
2000 was the worst time of my life. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 02:57 AM |
#37 |
-
You are talking about the Texas primary rules? |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 02:12 AM |
#9 |
 -
nothing to do with Texas |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:27 AM |
#19 |
-
Caucuses |
Beregond2 |
Mar-05-08 02:23 AM |
#17 |
 -
When party activists have the only say |
zlt234 |
Mar-05-08 02:29 AM |
#20 |
  -
Let's take away Hawii's senators too and give them to California. |
anigbrowl |
Mar-05-08 02:36 AM |
#25 |
 -
the constitution is not the democratic party |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:47 AM |
#35 |
 -
The DNC is where the nomination happens, those are the rules. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 03:19 AM |
#40 |
 -
teh internets |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:33 AM |
#22 |
  -
Doesn't the same apply to republicans? |
anigbrowl |
Mar-05-08 02:37 AM |
#26 |
 -
sure |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:43 AM |
#32 |
 -
Yes, I was pointing that out in another post |
lapfog_1 |
Mar-05-08 02:33 AM |
#23 |
-
Parliment |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:39 AM |
#28 |
-
This will be one of the many arguments tabled at the DNC. Who will be the most persuasive, is... |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 02:39 AM |
#27 |
 -
2012 |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:41 AM |
#29 |
-
Yeah, 2012 I expect caucuses to be done away with. Perhaps even the Electoral College. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 02:43 AM |
#31 |
-
BTW, isn't it somewhat amusing that the woman, in the end, gets less reward for equal effort? |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 02:44 AM |
#33 |
 -
wow... just wow |
Buve |
Mar-05-08 02:49 AM |
#36 |
-
I made that my sig. It's worth noting everywhere. |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 03:01 AM |
#39 |
-
In terms of delegate cost: Rudy Guiliani's 1 delegate for $50 million takes the cake |
LSdemocrat |
Mar-05-08 03:37 AM |
#48 |
-
Transvestites even get a more raw deal than women! |
joshcryer |
Mar-05-08 03:39 AM |
#50 |