You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: no - that would be disastrous. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. no - that would be disastrous.
A bait-and-switch would be a bad idea. We're not talking about the kind of people who would go, "Oh, ok", and get on board with Kerry.

In addition to what he's saying about the state of politics in America, Nader's also 100% correct about Kerry and the consultants. Fucking overpaid, hairsplitting, focus-grouping dimwits aren't just helping to ruin the Democratic party, they're helping to ruin the entire country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC