ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-01-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| -PLEASE... Someone tell me why Hillary should be nominated. |
Dr_eldritch |
Mar-01-08 10:08 PM |
#0 |
 -
I got nothin |
Yael |
Mar-01-08 10:09 PM |
#1 |
  -
you head stilling worried about O. losing? |
rodeodance |
Mar-01-08 11:21 PM |
#55 |
| -
Nah RD -- just can't come up with a compelling reason to nominate her |
Yael |
Mar-02-08 12:02 AM |
#64 |
| -
Because she is really good at domestic crisis bimbo management. |
dkf |
Mar-01-08 10:11 PM |
# |
| -
Because |
ruggerson |
Mar-01-08 10:11 PM |
#2 |
| -
so that's why she's supported Bush so often |
Carolina |
Mar-02-08 08:59 AM |
#75 |
| -
Because I've always wanted to see Bush in a pantsuit |
DJ13 |
Mar-01-08 10:11 PM |
#3 |
| -
spraying beer |
stop the bleeding |
Mar-01-08 10:21 PM |
# |
| -
I really don't get why people continue to comment on the pantsuits |
FlyingSquirrel |
Mar-01-08 11:06 PM |
#50 |
| -
She should wear desert camo like the soldiers she helped send to Iraq. n/t |
greguganus |
Mar-02-08 04:47 AM |
#69 |
| -
lol..not gonna touch that one! n/t |
greguganus |
Mar-02-08 04:44 AM |
#68 |
| -
Um...don't you know. It's "her turn"... |
jefferson_dem |
Mar-01-08 10:13 PM |
#4 |
| -
YOU must be a NADER supporter. |
Double T |
Mar-01-08 10:14 PM |
#5 |
| -
Because she's inevitable... |
scheming daemons |
Mar-01-08 10:14 PM |
#6 |
| -
Because... |
BushDespiser12 |
Mar-01-08 10:15 PM |
#7 |
| -
Uh-Oh... looks like Hillary's thread is getting no love. C'mon people... we need reasons! nt |
Dr_eldritch |
Mar-01-08 10:15 PM |
#8 |
| -
I gave every possible reason I could muster... |
BushDespiser12 |
Mar-01-08 10:28 PM |
#20 |
| -
If nothing else, she's a known quantity. eom |
Birthmark |
Mar-01-08 10:15 PM |
#9 |
| -
One word: COMPETENCE |
mtnsnake |
Mar-01-08 10:16 PM |
#10 |
| -
Like the competence of her campaign? |
Alexander |
Mar-01-08 10:21 PM |
#15 |
| -
Or her IWR vote? |
Exilednight |
Mar-01-08 10:34 PM |
#27 |
| -
Don't Ask Me |
From The Left |
Mar-01-08 10:17 PM |
#11 |
| -
So far, one word is all they got. |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 10:17 PM |
#12 |
| -
Because Dems just have to keep nominating people who |
RBInMaine |
Mar-01-08 10:19 PM |
#13 |
| -
for the record.... |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 10:20 PM |
#14 |
| -
Elsewhere, love your link. I just don't understand why anyone |
bellasgrams |
Mar-01-08 10:31 PM |
#25 |
| -
: ) agreed |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 10:39 PM |
#32 |
| -
Yup! ready from day before 1 |
spokane |
Mar-01-08 10:43 PM |
#35 |
| -
Oh please, more B.S. from the Obama camp!!!! |
Beacool |
Mar-01-08 10:24 PM |
#16 |
| -
Apparently you can't think of one good reason why Clinton is prepared... |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 10:32 PM |
# |
| -
And they say Obamamania is irrational? HAHAHAHA |
From The Left |
Mar-02-08 05:17 AM |
#72 |
| -
According to Wes Clark... |
stillcool47 |
Mar-01-08 10:28 PM |
#17 |
| -
The "rear" admiral was there because she's so far "behind" in the race. n/t |
greguganus |
Mar-02-08 04:53 AM |
#70 |
| -
So far we have... |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 10:28 PM |
#18 |
| -
Obama is highly partisan? |
ruggerson |
Mar-01-08 10:30 PM |
#23 |
| -
This thread is your prime opportunity to talk about HRC, and all you people want... |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 10:34 PM |
#28 |
| -
I didn't bring him up, you did |
ruggerson |
Mar-01-08 10:39 PM |
#33 |
| -
You're avoiding the subject. |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 10:43 PM |
#34 |
| -
sure |
ruggerson |
Mar-01-08 10:48 PM |
#39 |
| -
A windy opinion piece with no links. I'm totally knocked out. |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 10:51 PM |
#43 |
| -
uh, usually when one has an opinion on something |
ruggerson |
Mar-01-08 11:02 PM |
#49 |
| -
Okay, if you want to change the subject to an offhand comment about Obama... |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 11:34 PM |
#58 |
| -
Friend? Is Sen. Feingold partisan? |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-02-08 08:46 AM |
#73 |
| -
I would dispute that |
hfojvt |
Mar-01-08 11:35 PM |
#59 |
| -
Health Care |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 10:28 PM |
#19 |
| -
Economy |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 10:29 PM |
#22 |
| -
Um, more accurately it would be called health insurance. |
AZBlue |
Mar-01-08 10:50 PM |
#42 |
| -
Sorry. Can't think of a single reason. nt |
usnret88 |
Mar-01-08 10:29 PM |
#21 |
| -
Children |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 10:31 PM |
#24 |
| -
She's going to fix all those other things AND the children? |
usnret88 |
Mar-01-08 10:45 PM |
#36 |
| -
Energy Independence and Fighting Global Warming |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 10:32 PM |
#26 |
| -
We have an answer!! |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 10:37 PM |
#30 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-01-08 10:50 PM |
#41 |
| -
Ahhh, name calling. But still no reasons to nominate Sen. Clinton. |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 10:53 PM |
#44 |
| -
Lowering taxes for middle class families. |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 10:36 PM |
#29 |
| -
especially if you think somebody making $100,000 is middle class |
hfojvt |
Mar-01-08 11:45 PM |
#62 |
| -
Sex Appeal |
spokane |
Mar-01-08 10:38 PM |
#31 |
| -
Ohhhh yeahhhh! |
Dr_eldritch |
Mar-01-08 10:47 PM |
#38 |
| -
Obama always agrees with her.."I agree with Senator Clinton"...he never says anything else |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 10:46 PM |
#37 |
| -
They just played that on SNL skit--it was hillarious!-- |
rodeodance |
Mar-01-08 10:50 PM |
#40 |
| -
aww damn I have my TV turned off...I'll have to wait and catch it on here |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 11:10 PM |
#51 |
| -
there were several duzzies of obama including his being now PRESENT for public |
rodeodance |
Mar-01-08 11:20 PM |
#54 |
| -
omg LOL |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 11:26 PM |
#57 |
| -
sorry i did not record----but many good for You-tube. |
rodeodance |
Mar-01-08 11:41 PM |
#60 |
| -
If you can't figure it out that's your problem |
katandmoon |
Mar-01-08 10:53 PM |
#45 |
| -
Ahhhh, got nothing to say |
spokane |
Mar-01-08 10:57 PM |
#46 |
| -
And if Sen. Clinton's defenders can't be bothered to explain her value... |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-01-08 11:01 PM |
#48 |
| -
why should we--all you obamababies do is mock her anyway. do your own homework |
rodeodance |
Mar-01-08 11:43 PM |
#61 |
| -
Is that the phone bank script? "Hello, I'm calling from the Clinton campaign..." |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-02-08 12:27 AM |
#66 |
| -
uh huh HRC is gonna make that sam cooke song a reality |
BenDavid |
Mar-01-08 10:59 PM |
#47 |
| -
give this man a kewpie doll |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-01-08 11:11 PM |
#52 |
| -
only Sam Cooke song Hill's gonna sing is "There'll Be No Second Time". n/t |
greguganus |
Mar-02-08 04:59 AM |
#71 |
| -
Are you really asking? Okay... |
LadyVT |
Mar-01-08 11:14 PM |
#53 |
| -
Pantsuits!!!! |
ruiner4u |
Mar-01-08 11:23 PM |
#56 |
| -
She shouldn't - Senator Obama should. That said, unlike some HRC supporters I'll vote for WHOEVER is |
apocalypsehow |
Mar-01-08 11:49 PM |
#63 |
| -
Are you too lazy to do some research? |
emilyg |
Mar-02-08 12:13 AM |
#65 |
| -
When I can have a thread full of zealots do it for me? No... that's not 'lazy'... |
Dr_eldritch |
Mar-02-08 04:37 AM |
#67 |
| -
I thought of one - we get to call her by her first name, and we get |
usnret88 |
Mar-02-08 08:52 AM |
#74 |
| -
she SHOULDN'T |
Carolina |
Mar-02-08 09:06 AM |
#76 |
| -
Because She's A Great Dem And Would Make A Great President, Duh. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Mar-02-08 09:16 AM |
#77 |
| -
So how exactly does that distinguish her from her primary opponent? |
ClassWarrior |
Mar-02-08 08:02 PM |
#79 |
| -
I don't think she should be. And neither should Obama. n/t |
LWolf |
Mar-02-08 09:41 AM |
#78 |
| -
As far as I know, she won't be. |
From The Left |
Mar-02-08 08:22 PM |
#80 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread