You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #33: thank you so much for putting that in such great terms! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. thank you so much for putting that in such great terms!
:toast: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -It was obvious Barack did not want to insult Farrakhans followers, that is why he did not reject the MassDemm  Feb-26-08 10:21 PM   #0 
  - There is no difference between rejecting and denouncing. Hillary was playing silly season politics  GarbagemanLB   Feb-26-08 10:21 PM   #1 
  - and the audience laughed, so I guess they didn't think he blew it.  GarbagemanLB   Feb-26-08 10:22 PM   #2 
  - No, he told russert or williams, whichever, that he did not reject the endorsement  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:23 PM   #7 
  - If I offer you a haircut...  stahbrett   Feb-26-08 10:27 PM   #20 
  - Let's Take Your Example:  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Feb-26-08 10:32 PM   #46 
     - i do  mkultra   Feb-26-08 10:36 PM   #60 
     - Ummmmm, What Now?  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Feb-26-08 10:41 PM   #81 
     - Replace "I disagree. I hate it" with "I denounce your opinions & didn't ask for your opinion"  stahbrett   Feb-26-08 10:37 PM   #66 
        - Nope. Doesn't Work.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Feb-26-08 10:44 PM   #91 
  - He said there was nothing formal to reject  Bleachers7   Feb-26-08 10:31 PM   #40 
     - Something Formal Was Not Necessary.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Feb-26-08 10:34 PM   #52 
        - he went on at length  mkultra   Feb-26-08 10:37 PM   # 
           - He was asked directly to reject the endorsement and he said he would not.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:38 PM   #68 
              - And the debate ended there and nothing more on the subject was said? Not on my TV. n/t  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:45 PM   #92 
              - My hubby who is apolitical  Mojorabbit   Feb-27-08 12:05 AM   #164 
  - There's A Huge Difference, And So Many Are Trying To Play Dumb By Stating Otherwise.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Feb-26-08 10:27 PM   #19 
     - thank you so much for putting that in such great terms!  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #33 
     - Absolutely correct.  Blue_In_AK   Feb-26-08 10:31 PM   #41 
     - I agree. He beat around the bush on that one.  rodeodance   Feb-26-08 10:33 PM   #51 
     - He did beat around the bush (no pun), kinda' like a certain  lumpy   Feb-26-08 10:51 PM   #113 
     - And good old fat face Timmy let him get away with it by not making  Auntie Bush   Feb-26-08 10:56 PM   #125 
     - So we'll probably see a bump for Hillary? n/t  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:37 PM   #65 
     - Why? You Found The Issue That Important?  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Feb-26-08 10:45 PM   #94 
     - there is a difference  mkultra   Feb-26-08 10:38 PM   #69 
     - Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!  gerrilea   Feb-26-08 10:38 PM   #71 
     - Do we only have to denounce the bad parts of Farrakhan?  dmesg   Feb-26-08 10:40 PM   #77 
     - I like to agree, but the majority of Americans, like me only  gerrilea   Feb-26-08 10:52 PM   #117 
     - Only if you are willing to concede the inverse of this ridiculous argument.  Usrename   Feb-27-08 10:33 AM   #188 
        - It Is 100% Rational And Logically Sound.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Feb-27-08 11:40 AM   #190 
           - Right, your principles do not commute.  Usrename   Feb-27-08 11:50 AM   #191 
  - Not really.  woolldog   Feb-26-08 10:22 PM   #3 
  - Then why did he not flatly reject the endorsement of an anti semitic.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:24 PM   #9 
     - He did (eom)  woolldog   Feb-26-08 10:28 PM   #25 
        - He did not. He only rejected and denounced the anti semitism, not the endorsement. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:36 PM   #59 
           - probably for the same reason hillary hasnt rejected limballs  mkultra   Feb-26-08 10:39 PM   #74 
           - Sure he did.  woolldog   Feb-26-08 10:50 PM   # 
           - When Russert first asked if he accepted the endorsement  femmedem   Feb-27-08 09:30 AM   #182 
  - "denounce" is much stronger than "reject"  heraldsqure   Feb-26-08 10:22 PM   #4 
  - But when you denounce, and do not reject the support,  Ravy   Feb-26-08 10:28 PM   #24 
  - What the fuck dictionary do you have?  Seeker30   Feb-26-08 10:29 PM   #29 
     - This the fuck dictionary:  heraldsqure   Feb-27-08 10:43 AM   #189 
  - Who Farrakhan supports has nothing to do with Obama personally  Truth Hurts A Lot   Feb-26-08 10:22 PM   #5 
  - I don't think he is an anti semitic. I think he is a straddling politician and will even use an  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:25 PM   #11 
  - Hillary is going to lose ba ha ha ha ha! n/t  LoZoccolo   Feb-26-08 10:23 PM   #6 
  - Buy a Dictionary MassDemm... Denounce is a synonym for Reject.....  scheming daemons   Feb-26-08 10:24 PM   #8 
  - As soon as the transcript comes out. He did not reject the endorsement. He said he did not reject  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:27 PM   #18 
  - Fine  maddiejoan   Feb-27-08 09:59 AM   #185 
  - Ok, I'll face it: You think he blew it....  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:25 PM   #10 
  - His campaign is doing so well in 3 words Main Stream Media  gerrilea   Feb-26-08 10:28 PM   #27 
     - If the MSM, and a majority of voters support him, how did he blow it? n/t  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #31 
        - All of his International Answers he took from Hillary!  gerrilea   Feb-26-08 10:35 PM   #58 
           - yep, if that wasn't obvioius, the American people will deserve what they get.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:42 PM   #84 
           - I'm sure you were thinking of supporting him anyways.  Forkboy   Feb-26-08 10:43 PM   #85 
           - I don't whine, I do "bitch" alot though!  gerrilea   Feb-26-08 10:50 PM   #110 
              - Bitch is the New Black!!!!  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:52 PM   #116 
                 - LOL...  gerrilea   Feb-26-08 10:53 PM   #119 
           - So you agree - he didn't blow it. Thanks! n/t  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:46 PM   #97 
           - Funny you should say that because it's the same thing  Beacool   Feb-26-08 11:10 PM   #148 
  - Obama CLEARLY denounced Farahkan's Anti-semitism- how  Bluerthanblue   Feb-26-08 10:25 PM   #12 
  - I have acknowledged that, but he did not reject the endorsement. That's the point.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #38 
  - Did he reject his endorsement too?  maddiejoan   Feb-27-08 10:00 AM   #186 
  - So you think. huh?  fedupinBushcountry   Feb-26-08 10:26 PM   #13 
  - Everything about that bastard should be denounced/rejected!  AX10   Feb-26-08 10:26 PM   #14 
  - That was the only line of the night that got applause.  Bleachers7   Feb-26-08 10:26 PM   #15 
  - no blew it! He answered it adequately  bambino   Feb-26-08 10:27 PM   #16 
  - Hillary should definitely hammer this issues up to Tuesday  tammywammy   Feb-26-08 10:27 PM   #17 
  - yeah, he would not reject the endorsement and told fat pig that. but they let him off easy.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:28 PM   #26 
  - Exactly, she should keep saying  tammywammy   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #35 
     - He said, if she want's to hear the word "reject" he will concede the point. n/t  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:33 PM   #49 
        - He only denounced the anti semitism, not the endorsement.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:37 PM   #64 
           - So, the endorsement is more important than antisemitism, for Clinton supporters.  Mass   Feb-26-08 10:38 PM   #72 
           - No, he is trying to parse for votes, that's what is despicable. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:43 PM   #86 
              - No, he is not. Hillary is trying to parse words by trying to create an outrage in the Jewish  Mass   Feb-26-08 10:47 PM   #102 
                 - I am not trying to do that at all my main point here is that  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:54 PM   #120 
                    - May be not you, but she is. It is clear. and it is despicable.  Mass   Feb-26-08 10:57 PM   #126 
                       - I wrote the OP. did you mean me or not, which post do you mean? nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 11:03 PM   #136 
                          - Well, as many Clinton's supporters came with the same point, it is talking points at its best.  Mass   Feb-26-08 11:06 PM   #141 
                             - Mass, sometimes the truth is the truth. I 100% believe this and we have a difference of an opinion.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 11:22 PM   #153 
           - No, at the end he didn't specify - he accepted either denounce or reject as acceptable to him....  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:40 PM   #76 
           - and once again he shouldnt denouce the endorsment  mkultra   Feb-26-08 10:42 PM   #82 
  - He's already indicated he's ready to use whatever "magic words" Hillary demands....  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:32 PM   #47 
     - Oh I keep forgetting  tammywammy   Feb-26-08 10:34 PM   #55 
  - Stick with this. It's your last hope.  cottonseed   Feb-26-08 10:27 PM   #21 
  - As he can't stop a guy from supporting you. he answered just fine..  NDambi   Feb-26-08 10:27 PM   #22 
  - Right. The race is over. He lost. blahblahblah. This is SO tiring. America does NOT  K Gardner   Feb-26-08 10:28 PM   #23 
  - Keep looking for that issue there. I'm sure you'll find one eventually.  bluestateguy   Feb-26-08 10:29 PM   #28 
  - Every time Clinton supporters claim Obama blew it, he rises 2-5 points in the polls. Your  Occam Bandage   Feb-26-08 10:29 PM   #30 
  - Someone needs to look into Hillary's bizarre comment about a party who was on her line for Senate  ProSense   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #32 
  - oh-----I await another post from you related all things of hillary-hate. yup--go for it.  rodeodance   Feb-26-08 10:37 PM   #62 
     - Do you have a response to why she claimed she rejected their support when she actually got it? n/t  ProSense   Feb-26-08 10:43 PM   #87 
     - you are twisted, she publicly and forcefully rejected the endorsement. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:46 PM   #100 
     - No, she said she rejected their support. Farrahkan isn't a party. She could have refused  ProSense   Feb-26-08 11:01 PM   #134 
     - My ears did not hear her say that tonight. and i washed them. Did you?  rodeodance   Feb-26-08 10:48 PM   #106 
     - i bet when you say things like that your breath fogs up the mirror  mkultra   Feb-26-08 10:43 PM   #88 
        - he did not answer strongly  mkultra   Feb-26-08 10:45 PM   #93 
        - nah---i am not vain. no mirrows around.  rodeodance   Feb-26-08 10:47 PM   # 
           - lol, although you give me the perfect opening  mkultra   Feb-26-08 10:49 PM   #108 
              - I had no offer --so you can reject and denouce yourself away.  rodeodance   Feb-26-08 10:58 PM   #129 
                 - ahh, to the ignor with you humorless asshole  mkultra   Feb-26-08 11:04 PM   #139 
  - That's pretty sad. n/t  sfexpat2000   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #34 
  - Is this your second or third of the night?  Forkboy   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #36 
  - Oh my little pet, what does it matter to you? don't you have a star? If you do you can search and  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:31 PM   #45 
     - Awww...looks like I touched a nerve.  Forkboy   Feb-26-08 10:37 PM   #63 
        - you are a sicko. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:41 PM   #80 
           - Actually, a lot of us will remember that you were pushing this sh!t tonight.  sfexpat2000   Feb-26-08 10:54 PM   #121 
           - pushing what that Obama will use an anti semitic to garner votes.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 11:01 PM   #135 
              - Please keep posting this crap.  sfexpat2000   Feb-26-08 11:03 PM   #137 
           - Could be worse. I could be filled with hate for one of the candidates.  Forkboy   Feb-26-08 10:56 PM   #124 
           - Sicko's favorite hobby, wiseassery . Perverse what ?  lumpy   Feb-27-08 12:23 AM   #165 
  - He sure beat around the bush on that one-5 minutes? and no clear answer.  rodeodance   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #37 
  - yes, he answered weakly  mkultra   Feb-26-08 10:47 PM   #101 
  - Russert, that you?  izzybeans   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #39 
  - Obama handled her theatrics well and won applause for it.  book_worm   Feb-26-08 10:31 PM   #42 
  - I disagree with his hateful message but I support his support of black men  NJObamaWoman   Feb-26-08 10:31 PM   #43 
  - Well there are a lot of jews in this country who might have a different feeling  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:33 PM   #50 
     - oh I honk he's hateful but that doesn't mean that I can't find his encouragement  NJObamaWoman   Feb-26-08 10:52 PM   #115 
        - Jews have experienced and are still experiencing bigotry  lumpy   Feb-27-08 12:36 AM   #167 
  - He refused to tell Russert initially that he "rejected" Farrakhan's support  mtnsnake   Feb-26-08 10:31 PM   #44 
  - Yup, and then agreed to use "reject" - issue defused n/t  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:34 PM   #54 
  - no it is not defused. He initially refused to reject the endorsement.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:39 PM   #75 
     - Not in your mind, but the issue is diffused in voters minds. Proof? No bump for Hillary n/t  GOTV   Feb-26-08 10:42 PM   #83 
  - You guys are getting caught up in semantics.  woolldog   Feb-26-08 10:46 PM   #99 
     - You must repeat after me.... reject denounce i do, reject denounce i do  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 11:06 PM   #143 
        - It's not a voting block he's ever in danger of losing.  woolldog   Feb-26-08 11:24 PM   #158 
  - I don't think he blew it.  goodgd_yall   Feb-26-08 10:32 PM   #48 
  - In my mind, he still only "rejected and denounced" the anti semitism, not the endorsement. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:34 PM   #53 
  - You are the same people who say that we should write off half of this country's...  Kristi1696   Feb-26-08 10:35 PM   #56 
  - This argument is childish, petty, and desperate.....  Me_Shell   Feb-26-08 10:35 PM   #57 
  - This is in the running for the stupidest thread ever.  Political Heretic   Feb-26-08 10:36 PM   #61 
  - What an argument of a loser...ferchrissakes...  zulchzulu   Feb-26-08 10:37 PM   #67 
  - What a vile, reprehensible smear -- and of the Democratic frontrunner, no less.  The Stranger   Feb-26-08 10:38 PM   #70 
  - He is the one not willing to reject an endorsement from a person who outwardly hates jews. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:44 PM   #90 
     - That is complete bullshit, and you know it. He rejected, denounced, and jumped through every hoop  The Stranger   Feb-27-08 09:12 AM   #173 
        - Actions speak louder then words...  Demagitator   Feb-27-08 09:44 AM   #184 
           - Well then that is your problem.  The Stranger   Feb-27-08 12:51 PM   #192 
  - He made it very clear, that frarrakhan offered no help, but if he did, he would denouce and reject  still_one   Feb-26-08 10:39 PM   #73 
  - When asked if he rejected Farrakhans endorsement he said no. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:40 PM   #78 
     - First of all if you want to be "really" accurate, which I am sure you don't  still_one   Feb-26-08 10:46 PM   #98 
        - He told Russert he could not reject the endorsement from someone who thought  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:50 PM   #111 
        - It would have been wise for him to reject any endorsement -implied or not. Now it will linger and  rodeodance   Feb-26-08 10:53 PM   #118 
  - I am so glad that Hillary called him to account on it!  ElsewheresDaughter   Feb-26-08 10:40 PM   #79 
  - We don't think that got across though. It came across as her being petty over silly semantics.  AgadorSparticus   Feb-26-08 10:44 PM   #89 
  - True, the media is a failure for every american. Count on it if O wins the nom. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:45 PM   #95 
  - Her family does have 35 years of experience in silly semantics.  ContinentalOp   Feb-26-08 11:46 PM   #161 
  - a minor question for you  Bodhi BloodWave   Feb-26-08 10:45 PM   #96 
  - Well I think all of my opinions should be accepted as true gospel. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:47 PM   #104 
  - Underneath it all is Obama gutless or just an over educated  lumpy   Feb-26-08 10:47 PM   #103 
  - he is an inexperienced talented orator. We need experience in the WH not an experiment. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:48 PM   #105 
  - No, he is a black man and therefore antisemitic. Just like Jackson and Farrakhan.  Mass   Feb-26-08 10:49 PM   #109 
     - You are being sarcastic, right? /nt  still_one   Feb-26-08 10:50 PM   #112 
        - I do not know. Was the OP sarcastic? Because it is no more farfetched.  Mass   Feb-26-08 10:51 PM   #114 
           - Well, if Clinton supporters pursue this approach, and she get the nomination, she won't get my vote  still_one   Feb-26-08 10:56 PM   #122 
              - You are reading way too much into this. Go back and read my OP  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:57 PM   #127 
                 - Did Hillary renounce the endorsement she got from racists and antigay people in the South?  Mass   Feb-26-08 11:00 PM   #132 
                 - Of course neither endorsed her, but she also didn't explicitly reject ann coulter's  still_one   Feb-26-08 11:08 PM   #145 
                 - OK. so you interpret it different than I do. If there is that ambiguity  still_one   Feb-26-08 11:06 PM   #142 
                    - fair enough we have a difference of opinion on this.  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 11:09 PM   #146 
                       - Well, either way, this forum isn't good for me, and I somtimes say things  still_one   Feb-26-08 11:29 PM   #159 
                          - I feel much the same way, from a different perspective, but the just the same anyways. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 11:43 PM   #160 
                             - As someone else posted the problem will be Revrend Wright from Obama's church  still_one   Feb-26-08 11:48 PM   #162 
  - He rejected and denounced it.  AtomicKitten   Feb-26-08 10:48 PM   #107 
  - What exactly did he denounce and reject, please do tell, intelligently if you can. tx. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 10:56 PM   #123 
     - This is so old it's ancient. When he found out the pastor of his church  sfexpat2000   Feb-26-08 10:58 PM   #130 
     - But then you'd have to have someone explain it to you.  AtomicKitten   Feb-26-08 11:08 PM   #144 
  - "MIchael Corleone, do you renounce Satan and all evil...."  cliffordu   Feb-26-08 10:57 PM   #128 
  - I have a better question..........  Beacool   Feb-26-08 11:00 PM   #131 
  - Take the following for whatever it is worth:  still_one   Feb-26-08 11:23 PM   #155 
  - So you're telling me that people who believe that white people were created in a mad science...  JVS   Feb-26-08 11:00 PM   #133 
  - Obama spoke for TWO MINUTES about his history of rejecting Farrakhan...  writes3000   Feb-26-08 11:04 PM   #138 
  - He refused to reject the endorsement and then tried to make it seem like he did. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 11:05 PM   #140 
  - He DENOUNCED the man and the man's BIGOTED positions.  writes3000   Feb-26-08 11:15 PM   #150 
     - Did he endorse him or said he was proud that a black man was were he was?  Mass   Feb-26-08 11:17 PM   #151 
     - He was asked straight out if he rejected the endorsement and he said no. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 11:24 PM   #157 
        - Correct: His reasoning? He agrees with Farrakhan that he's a good man.  writes3000   Feb-26-08 11:55 PM   #163 
  - i know, that wasnt enough renunciation? lol...  meow mix   Feb-27-08 12:27 AM   #166 
  - The difference was between rejecting the endorsement and denouncing the anti-semitism.  Baconfoot   Feb-26-08 11:09 PM   #147 
  - Wouldn't want to alienate any body that likes Mr. Farrakhan...  DemEtienne   Feb-26-08 11:12 PM   #149 
  - And if Obama HAD rejected the endorsement some of you folks...  cliffordu   Feb-26-08 11:20 PM   #152 
  - He needed to do both absolutely. One without the other is pandering for votes. nt  MassDemm   Feb-26-08 11:23 PM   #154 
  - Reminds me of that Scene from A Few Good Men  NeedleCast   Feb-26-08 11:23 PM   #156 
  - I think Hillary saved his butt on this one! He was clearly dancing  napi21   Feb-27-08 12:47 AM   #168 
  - Barack is not going to reject anybody in his America you can't have unity otherwise.  cooolandrew   Feb-27-08 08:57 AM   #169 
  - Hillary was race baiting in the worse possible way, disgrace really.  cooolandrew   Feb-27-08 08:58 AM   #170 
  - Second half of that question was about Obama's minister and  Little Star   Feb-27-08 09:00 AM   #171 
  - yup Obaba' minister not only gave Farrakhan an award, they went on a trip together to visit Kadaffi  ElsewheresDaughter   Feb-27-08 09:24 AM   #177 
  - here's a simple response: He endorsed me, I didn't endorse him  yurbud   Feb-27-08 09:01 AM   #172 
  - Obama needed to say "I REJECT Farrakhans endorsement" and he did't until Hillary called himn on it  ElsewheresDaughter   Feb-27-08 09:27 AM   #179 
     - I thought it was clever of her to say she had to reject support from those in NY spewing hate.......  ElsewheresDaughter   Feb-27-08 09:28 AM   #181 
  - agreed ...Obama only said he disagreed with a few of Farrakhans policies. ........  ElsewheresDaughter   Feb-27-08 09:17 AM   #174 
  - So if Farrakhan says orange juice is good for you, we should disagree because he said it?  yurbud   Feb-27-08 09:19 AM   #175 
  - Has HRC denounced OR rejected Anne Coulter's endorsement?  northernsoul   Feb-27-08 09:22 AM   #176 
  - Exactly n/t  Demagitator   Feb-27-08 09:27 AM   #178 
  - He didn't blow it.  OnionPatch   Feb-27-08 09:28 AM   #180 
  - You gotta be fucking kidding to make a stupid observation such as that  0007   Feb-27-08 09:37 AM   #183 
  - Denouncing Farrakhans would be worse to his followers than rejecting his endorsement...  weezie1317   Feb-27-08 10:04 AM   #187 
  - This link just about sums up the way I felt about last nights answer.  0007   Feb-27-08 12:54 PM   #193 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC