You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #78: yes! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
78. yes!
My respect and admiration for her has continued to grow as I watch her fight for this nomination.She doesn't back down.She would govern just the same.

"Bitches get things DONE!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -It would be easy for Hillary Clinton to back off, but she fights for EVERYTHING bigtree  Feb-26-08 08:28 PM   #0 
  - To the point of sounding irrational and crazy?  Wolsh   Feb-26-08 08:30 PM   #1 
  - And who would that be?  emilyg   Feb-26-08 08:31 PM   #2 
  - only to 'irrational' listeners.  bigtree   Feb-26-08 08:32 PM   #3 
  - or sexist assholes  Skittles   Feb-26-08 08:33 PM   #7 
     - Your candidate is losing, so everyone must be sexist... riiight.  washingdem   Feb-26-08 08:44 PM   # 
        - I AM NOT A HILLARY SUPPORTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Skittles   Feb-26-08 08:47 PM   #20 
        - No, washington, that's not it. nt.  cbayer   Feb-26-08 09:57 PM   #50 
  - Are you deaf or hard of hearing or short on vocabulary?  Auntie Bush   Feb-26-08 09:10 PM   #33 
  - Fighting women are always called that.  aquart   Feb-26-08 09:48 PM   #45 
  - Calling Hillary Clinton irrational & crazy is just plain offensive.  cbayer   Feb-26-08 09:56 PM   #49 
     - Sorry about the late reply to this  hendo   Feb-27-08 02:54 PM   #80 
  - I would rather have a fighter that is a winner  Generic Brad   Feb-26-08 08:33 PM   #4 
  - this isn't the general election  bigtree   Feb-26-08 09:37 PM   #42 
  - She's belligerent in my opinion  high density   Feb-26-08 08:33 PM   #5 
  - Deliciously belligerent  bigtree   Feb-26-08 08:34 PM   #9 
  - But there's no sexism in that judgement. Is there?  aquart   Feb-26-08 09:49 PM   #46 
  - ABSOLUTELY!!!  BigDaddy44   Feb-26-08 08:33 PM   #6 
  - Unbelievable!!  Window   Feb-26-08 08:40 PM   #11 
  - She is absolutely wonderful tonight!  MyPetRock   Feb-26-08 08:34 PM   #8 
  - Having been in combat, I can assure you that combat is an awful metaphor for politics  dmesg   Feb-26-08 08:40 PM   #10 
  - You are the only one that mentioned combat.  Uzybone   Feb-26-08 08:42 PM   #12 
  - If I was wrong to equate "fight" and "combat", I apologize  dmesg   Feb-26-08 08:45 PM   #17 
  - that's a stretch  bigtree   Feb-26-08 08:43 PM   #15 
     - Repeating from above: I apologize if I was wrong to equate the terms "fight" and "combat"  dmesg   Feb-26-08 08:46 PM   #18 
        - Voters can clearly see that she is going to be relentless and insistent  bigtree   Feb-26-08 08:53 PM   #23 
           - Except it's not a "fight"  dmesg   Feb-26-08 08:57 PM   #25 
              - There are degrees of fighting. Everyone understands that.  bigtree   Feb-26-08 09:01 PM   #28 
                 - No, there's not, really  dmesg   Feb-26-08 09:06 PM   #30 
                    - that's just not been my life experience. My 'fights' haven't led to death, injury, destruction . . .  bigtree   Feb-26-08 09:12 PM   #35 
                       - Then they were conflicts, not fights  dmesg   Feb-26-08 09:14 PM   #36 
                          - that narrow definition or yours is not reflected in the history of literature  bigtree   Feb-26-08 09:16 PM   #38 
  - I agree  sniffa   Feb-26-08 08:43 PM   #13 
  - Obama looks sleepy  bigtree   Feb-26-08 08:59 PM   #26 
     - It's probably the heroin binge he was on last night  sniffa   Feb-26-08 09:10 PM   #32 
        - maybe he had a big meal beforehand  bigtree   Feb-26-08 09:14 PM   #37 
  - Really? I want a president who doesn't need to fight.  bowens43   Feb-26-08 08:43 PM   #14 
  - then you want a president who will do nothing  Uzybone   Feb-26-08 08:50 PM   #22 
  - So your vision of government is everybody agrees with Obama  aquart   Feb-26-08 09:51 PM   #47 
  - you seem to think things will be slam dunk for him. Wake up.  rodeodance   Feb-27-08 08:19 AM   #70 
  - She's awesome tonight.  busymom   Feb-26-08 08:44 PM   #16 
  - Soon you'll be one of the few left who are voting for her...  scheming daemons   Feb-26-08 08:46 PM   #19 
  - what an idiotic statement  bigtree   Feb-27-08 07:09 AM   #64 
  - So Combative  NeedleCast   Feb-26-08 08:48 PM   #21 
  - I know. She has me fired up.  bigtree   Feb-26-08 08:55 PM   #24 
  - I guess...  NeedleCast   Feb-26-08 09:08 PM   #31 
     - beats sulking or coming to this debate and these contests with the resignation the pundits imagine  bigtree   Feb-26-08 09:18 PM   #39 
  - There goes her huge donations from the debate sponsors. n/t  greguganus   Feb-26-08 09:43 PM   #43 
  - from debate sponsors?  bigtree   Feb-26-08 09:45 PM   #44 
  - Yeah, women should be more submissive.  aquart   Feb-26-08 09:52 PM   #48 
  - Yup, she's a fighter!  Auntie Bush   Feb-26-08 09:00 PM   #27 
  - I hope she NEVER concedes one damn thing.  Rageneau   Feb-26-08 09:03 PM   #29 
  - I support, without reservation, her right to do so if she thinks that's the best course of action  dmesg   Feb-26-08 09:10 PM   #34 
     - She will know when and if the time is right--it not now. Wise of her.  rodeodance   Feb-27-08 08:27 AM   #72 
  - Bullshit- it means she can't see the forest for the trees  thevoiceofreason   Feb-26-08 09:20 PM   #40 
  - Bullshit, back at ya {insert appropriate metaphor here}  bigtree   Feb-26-08 09:25 PM   #41 
     - Mine too  thevoiceofreason   Feb-26-08 10:32 PM   #58 
  - Like Bill fought against DOMA and welfare reform?  heraldsqure   Feb-26-08 09:57 PM   #51 
  - right, because women don't deserve to be judged on their own merits,  bigtree   Feb-27-08 07:11 AM   #65 
     - Only if..  hendo   Feb-27-08 08:15 AM   #67 
        - only idiots believe that she should be judged on everything her husband has said and done  bigtree   Feb-27-08 10:22 AM   #74 
           - So.  hendo   Feb-27-08 02:51 PM   #79 
  - Wrong.  anonymous171   Feb-26-08 09:58 PM   #52 
  - That's a problem. And she isn't much of a fighter, anyway...she's ducked a lot of them in this  milkyway   Feb-26-08 10:03 PM   #53 
  - everything except stopping immoral and illegal wars of aggression  LucyParsons   Feb-26-08 10:19 PM   #54 
  - I just hope she won't fight against her inevitable defeat...  RiverStone   Feb-26-08 10:23 PM   #55 
  - too bad she doesn't win  stillcool47   Feb-26-08 10:27 PM   #56 
  - Tim Russert is flagrantly biased...He goes into a 5 minute diatribe beating Hillary over the head  ElsewheresDaughter   Feb-26-08 10:30 PM   #57 
  - the first two were tabloid, right off the bat  bigtree   Feb-27-08 07:14 AM   #66 
  - Unfortunately, she's just not a really *good* fighter  AchtungToddler   Feb-26-08 10:37 PM   #59 
  - It's like the "vetted" nonsense  dmesg   Feb-27-08 12:22 AM   #61 
  - I think she is. Over 10 million voters apparently think so as well.  bigtree   Feb-27-08 07:01 AM   #62 
  - "she fights for EVERYTHING"  krkaufman   Feb-26-08 10:52 PM   #60 
  - And that's why she's the better candidate  OzarkDem   Feb-27-08 07:01 AM   #63 
  - I liked her comment about even though her health plan failed-she went right back to work  rodeodance   Feb-27-08 08:18 AM   #68 
  - So you're voting for Huckabee? I'm confused. n/t  casus belli   Feb-27-08 08:19 AM   #69 
  - yes, you are confused.  bigtree   Feb-27-08 10:26 AM   #76 
  - Even if she destroys the democratic party and gets John McCain elected??  workinclasszero   Feb-27-08 08:22 AM   #71 
  - Oh stop with the fear tactics. We have had enough with Bush/rove/ cheney!!  rodeodance   Feb-27-08 08:29 AM   #73 
  - Concern over Hillary 'destroying the party' is just some political tactic  bigtree   Feb-27-08 10:25 AM   #75 
  - She would "Fight" for the last piece of pie  From The Left   Feb-27-08 10:26 AM   #77 
  - yes!  DemEtienne   Feb-27-08 10:38 AM   #78 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC