You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #61: Then they should sue Matt Drudge for saying they did, right? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
61. Then they should sue Matt Drudge for saying they did, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Absolutely NO PROOF anyone from Clinton camp connected in anyway to 'the photo' MethuenProgressive  Feb-25-08 10:02 AM   #0 
  - Then why can't they deny it.  Zueda   Feb-25-08 10:05 AM   #1 
  - No political campaign  citizen_jane   Feb-25-08 10:09 AM   #3 
  - They need to deny it.  Zueda   Feb-25-08 10:11 AM   #9 
  - wrong it is absolutely standard in political campaigns  cali   Feb-25-08 10:15 AM   #19 
  - Then they deny it outright - as I have seen many campaigns do  karynnj   Feb-25-08 11:02 AM   #90 
  - Is there a direct quote? It's a reporters trick. "No comment!"="They didn't say they weren't Nazis"  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:13 AM   #14 
     - "The Clinton campaign did not deny the charge, but did not comment further."  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:15 AM   #17 
        - What is the photo's history? Was it published back when it was taken?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:31 AM   #37 
           - Doesn't matter. The Clinton camp is the one pushing it now.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:43 AM   #55 
              - Proof?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:51 AM   #71 
                 - Her non-denial response.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:51 AM   #75 
  - Clinton/McCain campaigns are connected, see link  WillYourVoteBCounted   Feb-25-08 10:06 AM   #2 
  - I did not know that. It is very interesting now.  AlinPA   Feb-25-08 10:19 AM   #30 
  - "Clinton's campaign did not deny its staffers distributed the photo" nt  cyberpj   Feb-25-08 10:09 AM   #4 
  - "Obama Camp Has not Denied They Are Setting Up Clinton With Fake Story!"  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:11 AM   #7 
     - Clinton camp has commented on the story. They did not deny they were behind it.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:19 AM   #26 
     - Obama's campaign is playing loose with words  Tom Rinaldo   Feb-25-08 10:46 AM   #59 
     - My quote was taken from an online article - where'd you get yours?  cyberpj   Feb-25-08 10:22 AM   #32 
        - Your quote isn't from the Clinton camp, it's a reporter's comment.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:37 AM   #45 
           - I said it was from an online article - reporting on the Clinton's camp lack of denial.  cyberpj   Feb-25-08 10:45 AM   #57 
  - WRONG  Unsane   Feb-25-08 10:10 AM   #5 
  - You have proof? Link or slink, as we say here on DU.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:11 AM   #10 
  - Facts Hurt Their Wee Little Heads. Go Easy On Them.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Feb-25-08 10:10 AM   #6 
  - hey, Drudge said so  grasswire   Feb-25-08 10:11 AM   #8 
  - And Raw Story. And Politico.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:13 AM   #12 
     - are you counting politico as a reliable source?  grasswire   Feb-25-08 10:15 AM   #16 
     - And is Raw Story also RW now? "Update: Clinton campaign doesn't deny distributing photo"  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:16 AM   #22 
        - everything is right wing  fenriswolf   Feb-25-08 11:26 AM   #100 
        - shame on Raw Story for using Drudge. (eom)  grasswire   Feb-25-08 01:48 PM   #107 
     - Without any proof or original reporting, they are just saying "Drudge says"  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:16 AM   #21 
        - How about "Raw Story says?"  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:17 AM   #23 
  - She hasn't denied it.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:12 AM   #11 
  - "Obama hasn't denied planting the story with his gay lover, Matt Drudge"  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:14 AM   #15 
  - The difference is that Obama was not specifically asked about it, nor did he send out  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:18 AM   #25 
  - Yet that's not really a proof, is it?  LanternWaste   Feb-25-08 11:56 AM   #105 
  - "There is no proof,"  leftofthedial   Feb-25-08 10:13 AM   #13 
  - Rumor against one's candidate - proof required. Rumor against opposing candidate - who needs proof?  Umbram   Feb-25-08 10:15 AM   #18 
  - What's he so upset about?  BlackVelvet04   Feb-25-08 10:16 AM   #20 
  - It's a cool pic of his *finally* getting some Foreign Policy experience.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:18 AM   #24 
     - Still no proof. Remember this Only ONE Camp was sure to have posessed thisn pic.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:28 AM   #35 
  - After Hill's Negativity in the Past Days ...  earthside   Feb-25-08 10:19 AM   #27 
  - Ah, good ol' "Guilty until proven Innocent" - Like Whitewater, yes?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:32 AM   #39 
  - Hello.....  BlackVelvet04   Feb-25-08 10:55 AM   #81 
  - did you see the non-denial  yourguide   Feb-25-08 10:19 AM   #28 
  - If your camp wasn't responsible wouldn't you want to get that out ASAP?  NDambi   Feb-25-08 10:21 AM   #31 
  - Obama's "foreign policy" advisors don't talk foreign policy  LizW   Feb-25-08 10:19 AM   #29 
  - Did HRC take that photo? I don't get it...  Mezzo   Feb-25-08 10:22 AM   #33 
  - Nope. She's just pushing it. Apparently SC didn't teach her that race-baiting doesn't work.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:33 AM   #40 
     - No proof it has anything to do with Clinton, just more gossip from the Obamas.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:36 AM   #44 
        - Other than their non-denial and the fact that three sources have reported it as such, yes.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:40 AM   #48 
           - 1 source. The other 2 are just reporting about Drudge. What, and DU makes 4?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:42 AM   #52 
              - Nope. Those are the three that are reporting on Maggie Williams' email.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:44 AM   #56 
                 - If "Harry and Louise" don't get you for him acting like a republican from the 90's  Mezzo   Feb-25-08 10:56 AM   #82 
  - I can't give Clinton the benefit of the doubt on this one  gravity   Feb-25-08 10:24 AM   #34 
  - Gravity - no one anywhere knew anything about this photo before today?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:29 AM   #36 
     - point: who is pushing it  dmsRoar   Feb-25-08 10:31 AM   #38 
     - Drudge - and he "spiced up" his find by claiming the Clinton camp was involved.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:34 AM   #41 
     - So... if yesterday you google/imaged "Obama" how long would it have taken to find this pic?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:35 AM   #42 
        - MP, your two defenses are mutually incompatible.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:42 AM   #51 
           - Is English your second language?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:46 AM   #58 
              - It's now hit CBS and ABC. I'm sure everyone but you is wrong, though.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:46 AM   #60 
                 - Proof Hillary Clinton sent this as an email to Matt Drudge is on CBS and ABC?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:49 AM   #68 
                    - Nope. Her non-denial is.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:50 AM   # 
     - Drudge  seasonedblue   Feb-25-08 10:35 AM   #43 
        - Drudge - the slimeball who broke the Lewinsky scandal and tried to destroy the Clintons.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:39 AM   #47 
           - The Lewinsky scandal was true  gravity   Feb-25-08 10:48 AM   #65 
           - So Hillary is teaming up with the slimeball who tried to destroy her family?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:50 AM   #70 
              - The Clintons are not known for being especially honor-bound.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:51 AM   #73 
              - The family was not destroyed , but greatly harmed - by Bill Clinton's actions  karynnj   Feb-25-08 11:05 AM   #93 
           - Well, Drudge is saying that he got it from them. If he's lying that's slander and they should sue.  thecatburgler   Feb-25-08 10:50 AM   #69 
     - I can't dismiss this yet  gravity   Feb-25-08 10:42 AM   #50 
  - And we're supposed to take the word of a campaign run by Republicans?  Skidmore   Feb-25-08 10:37 AM   #46 
  - No Clinton official has made any comment at all, Skids..  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:41 AM   #49 
     - Maggie Williams is not a Clinton official now? What a strange world you live in.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:42 AM   #54 
        - Quote?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:57 AM   #85 
           - Sure. From Raw Story:  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 11:00 AM   #88 
  - The non-denial is telling.  heraldsqure   Feb-25-08 10:42 AM   #53 
  - They have made no statement at all, right? So they're guilty?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:47 AM   #62 
  - No, they have made a statement. It did not include a denial. Jesus, try following the story.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:48 AM   #64 
  - I repeat. What is it they didn't deny? The content of the Drudge Report story?  Tom Rinaldo   Feb-25-08 10:49 AM   #67 
  - Then they should sue Matt Drudge for saying they did, right?  thecatburgler   Feb-25-08 10:47 AM   #61 
  - Did he say they "did"? Did you see what he wrote?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:48 AM   #63 
     - Yes. He stated that they were circulating that picture. If they aren't, that's libel.  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:48 AM   #66 
        - My bad, Libel, I called it slander in another post. nt  thecatburgler   Feb-25-08 10:51 AM   #72 
        - Internally. An email exhange between some staff members  Tom Rinaldo   Feb-25-08 10:52 AM   #76 
        - Oh Boy! Overzealous Staffer makes a return!  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 10:53 AM   #78 
           - Yeah, amazing how s/he keeps getting rehired! nt  thecatburgler   Feb-25-08 11:07 AM   #94 
        - Quote?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:52 AM   #77 
           - "Clinton Staffers Circulate 'Dressed' Obama." Did you even look at the Drudge headline?  Occam Bandage   Feb-25-08 11:01 AM   #89 
  - Hillary Clinton woos man (Drudge) who nearly ruined her husband  ProSense   Feb-25-08 10:51 AM   #74 
  - More no proof gossip from the DUbama Gossipteers.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:55 AM   #80 
     - Nonsense. You are more desperate than Hillary. She, in fact, circulated the "terrorist group" story.  ProSense   Feb-25-08 10:59 AM   #86 
        - Did you *see* the dress that tramp down the block wore to Church?? Sat in the front pew, too!  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 11:04 AM   #92 
           - Hillary is in damage control mode. n/t  ProSense   Feb-25-08 12:20 PM   #106 
  - If she did not do it, then who did?  MiltonF   Feb-25-08 10:53 AM   #79 
  - Drudge. The story sells better if it hints it might be from the Clintons.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:56 AM   #83 
  - I believe the photo was published just under a month ago.  jsamuel   Feb-25-08 10:57 AM   #84 
     - I know I've seen it before. Most likely right here on DU.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 10:59 AM   #87 
        - So, Drudge 'heard gossip' that a staffer had sent a photo to a staffer, and googled up this pic?  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 11:02 AM   #91 
  - DRUDGE DEBUNKED - photo was in 2/4/08 National Enquirer, not secretly held by Clinton Camp  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 11:09 AM   #95 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-25-08 11:18 AM   #97 
  - don't look at this!!!!  WillYourVoteBCounted   Feb-25-08 11:15 AM   #96 
  - "Muslim! Cocaine! Plagiarism! Snub!"  AtomicKitten   Feb-25-08 11:19 AM   #98 
  - Only "none" with the Cult Members. Thinking Democrats know she is very credible,  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 11:22 AM   #99 
     - don't bogart the kool-aid ;)  AtomicKitten   Feb-25-08 11:27 AM   #101 
        - I *really* like your ass-on-a-platter pic, AK.  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 11:33 AM   #103 
           - .  AtomicKitten   Feb-25-08 11:38 AM   #104 
  - :: crickets ::  MethuenProgressive   Feb-25-08 11:32 AM   #102 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC