boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-25-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 43. you are very welcome. I wonder if Raw Story will credit a lowly DU poster in their story |
| -Jeepers creepers Peeps, Get control of yourselves. Story was in the EXAMINER ON FEB 4th. |
MassDemm |
Feb-25-08 09:48 AM |
#0 |
 -
But Obama has spoken. It is to blame Hillary for it all. No deviation. Comply or else. |
kikiek |
Feb-25-08 09:51 AM |
# |
  -
I will not be assimulated! |
rodeodance |
Feb-25-08 09:56 PM |
#57 |
| -
And it will be on the front page of the Times on Nov 1 and the lead story on ABC network news too |
glenhappy |
Feb-25-08 09:51 AM |
#1 |
| -
kick |
MassDemm |
Feb-25-08 09:51 AM |
#2 |
| -
And? It's not like those mailers that Hillary is suddenly "enraged" over are new. |
Kristi1696 |
Feb-25-08 09:51 AM |
#3 |
| -
Unless it suits Obama. If it is against Hillary all sources are good. |
kikiek |
Feb-25-08 09:51 AM |
#4 |
| -
If the Clinton campaign is sending Drudge info about fellow Democrats... |
Kristi1696 |
Feb-25-08 09:58 AM |
#14 |
| -
Really. Drudge doesn't need anyone to feed him information. Pure speculation done to smear Hillary. |
kikiek |
Feb-25-08 10:04 AM |
#22 |
| -
Then her campaign needs to deny this immediately. |
Kristi1696 |
Feb-25-08 10:13 AM |
#25 |
| -
Why? Is that going to make a difference? No. It has been out for awhile. They love what they're |
kikiek |
Feb-25-08 10:22 AM |
#29 |
| -
I'm sorry to hear that you do not care about the integrity of the Democratic party. |
Kristi1696 |
Feb-25-08 10:25 AM |
#31 |
| -
Go on drama queens for Obama. No evidence of anything just smears from Obama and his surrogates. |
kikiek |
Feb-25-08 10:28 AM |
#34 |
| -
Guess you missed William Kristol being praised here for attacking Obama? |
Forkboy |
Feb-25-08 10:43 PM |
#61 |
| -
Drudge tried to tear Bill Clinton 849 new holes... |
glenhappy |
Feb-25-08 09:52 AM |
#6 |
| -
Kristi1696 do you have evidence Hillary sent those photos? |
UALRBSofL |
Feb-25-08 09:54 AM |
#9 |
| -
Politico is reporting that the campaign did not deny sending the photos... |
Kristi1696 |
Feb-25-08 09:56 AM |
# |
| -
No denial from the HRC camp |
yourguide |
Feb-25-08 09:59 AM |
#15 |
| -
Nor are all the nasty and untrue flyers that Clinton has sent out about obama |
Windy |
Feb-25-08 09:56 AM |
#13 |
| -
No, she was enraged because she thought they had |
BlackVelvet04 |
Feb-25-08 10:13 AM |
#26 |
| -
No, I was just told Clinton had "ALL MORNING" to deny "circulating" this picture & hasn't. |
Bluebear |
Feb-25-08 09:52 AM |
#5 |
| -
And what if it comes out that it IS true? Then what will you say? |
Kittycat |
Feb-25-08 09:53 AM |
#8 |
| -
That WHAT is true? That someone emailed an undoctored photo? |
Bluebear |
Feb-25-08 09:54 AM |
#11 |
| -
No one is denying that it has been in circulation. The question is, why are Clinton |
yellowcanine |
Feb-25-08 10:00 AM |
#16 |
| -
Nobody is shook up over a photo. |
Tatiana |
Feb-25-08 10:42 AM |
#42 |
| -
It's either true, OR they have so little control over their campaign... |
Kristi1696 |
Feb-25-08 10:01 AM |
#17 |
| -
But the issue is that the picture in question |
bicentennial_baby |
Feb-25-08 09:52 AM |
#7 |
| -
Will Joe Shmoe care about who sent it or that Obama is really |
glenhappy |
Feb-25-08 09:54 AM |
#10 |
| -
Obama is not a Muslim |
oldtime dfl_er |
Feb-25-08 10:02 AM |
#18 |
| -
Yes, he is supposedly a Christian (from an odd Church too) but... |
glenhappy |
Feb-25-08 10:07 AM |
#23 |
| -
I think democrats will care |
yourguide |
Feb-25-08 10:03 AM |
#21 |
| -
Exactly and Obama is using it to smear Hillary. He is pathetic. |
kikiek |
Feb-25-08 10:26 AM |
#32 |
| -
what planet are you on. |
yourguide |
Feb-25-08 10:56 AM |
#46 |
| -
Yeah right. This crap of Obama letting the dogs loose on Hillary once again is old. |
kikiek |
Feb-25-08 11:07 AM |
#48 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-25-08 11:14 AM |
#49 |
| -
Typical response filled with no evidence just outrage. I'm proud to be on your ignore list. |
kikiek |
Feb-25-08 11:17 AM |
#50 |
| -
I'm proud to be on many ignore lists. I wish I was on more of them. nt |
MassDemm |
Feb-25-08 11:22 AM |
#52 |
| -
The original source is not the issue. Clinton campaign workers circulating it is the issue. |
yellowcanine |
Feb-25-08 09:55 AM |
#12 |
| -
Big diff between rethugs |
yourguide |
Feb-25-08 10:02 AM |
#19 |
| -
So that's where the Clintons found that. Gotcha. |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-25-08 10:03 AM |
#20 |
| -
Nancy Pelosi in a head scarf caused the right wingers' heads to explode. |
Straight Shooter |
Feb-25-08 10:09 AM |
#24 |
| -
From a NATIONAL ENQUIRER article |
housewolf |
Feb-25-08 10:19 AM |
#27 |
| -
The question is not who published it, but who is publicizing it. |
Kristi1696 |
Feb-25-08 10:27 AM |
#33 |
| -
They are to mesmerized to see............They do not want truth. |
Little Star |
Feb-25-08 10:22 AM |
#28 |
| -
Good find. |
Arkansas Granny |
Feb-25-08 10:23 AM |
#30 |
| -
The Clinton camp could still "distribute it" if it as been previously released sometime n/t |
Levgreee |
Feb-25-08 10:30 AM |
#35 |
| -
so could the Obama camp. |
rodeodance |
Feb-25-08 09:59 PM |
#58 |
| -
So what? The Examiner is a tabloid- HRC is CIRCULATING tabloid trash! |
npincus |
Feb-25-08 10:31 AM |
#36 |
| -
Also, freepers wanted to get it to Drudge - according to Raw Story |
robbedvoter |
Feb-25-08 10:31 AM |
#37 |
| -
Sorry doesn't fit the ongoing story line that Obama is a victim. |
kikiek |
Feb-25-08 10:32 AM |
#38 |
| -
And... the Clinton's took the freepers advice, apparantly. |
dave29 |
Feb-25-08 12:09 PM |
#54 |
| -
Proof????? Just more empty words with nothing to back them up. |
Little Star |
Feb-25-08 12:45 PM |
#55 |
| -
Thanks for the info. |
seasonedblue |
Feb-25-08 10:32 AM |
#39 |
| -
you are very welcome. I wonder if Raw Story will credit a lowly DU poster in their story |
MassDemm |
Feb-25-08 10:44 AM |
#43 |
| -
Obama's campaign would not connect Hillary to the story without validation |
ProSense |
Feb-25-08 10:34 AM |
#40 |
| -
We expected no less in the smear department his popularity continues. |
cooolandrew |
Feb-25-08 10:40 AM |
#41 |
| -
Hillary Clinton woos man (Drudge) who nearly ruined her husband |
ProSense |
Feb-25-08 10:50 AM |
#44 |
| -
I saw that photo at the Freepers site way before Drudge claimed to have received it |
Beacool |
Feb-25-08 10:53 AM |
#45 |
| -
this is ridiculous. grasping at straws. nt |
MassDemm |
Feb-25-08 11:04 AM |
#47 |
| -
RAW STORY I HOPE YOU GIVE DU CREDIT!!!! AND LINK TO THIS PAGE. nt |
MassDemm |
Feb-25-08 11:19 AM |
#51 |
| -
kick |
Little Star |
Feb-25-08 01:22 PM |
#56 |
| -
Obamababies so in a hurry to blame Hillary instead of |
Little Star |
Feb-25-08 11:35 AM |
#53 |
| -
BO believed DRUDGE, a RW website, then criticized Clinton. And obamafolk say OK!! |
rodeodance |
Feb-25-08 10:01 PM |
#59 |
| -
So everybody believes Drudge now? |
NastyRiffraff |
Feb-25-08 10:03 PM |
#60 |
| -
Started at Freakrepublic, Continued by Hillary operatives at another |
workinclasszero |
Feb-25-08 10:50 PM |
#62 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread