Flabbergasted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 18. It would have been used during the GE against her. I also think it's a non-issue. |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 05:20 PM by Flabbergasted
|
| -I'll Be Nice And Defend Hillary -- Because There's Something She Shouldn't Be Attacked On |
Magic Rat |
Feb-24-08 05:13 PM |
#0 |
 -
Agreed. Hillary has many things to be ashamed of but this isn't one of them. |
Alexander |
Feb-24-08 05:14 PM |
#1 |
| -
Exactly. Talk about grasping at straws. It's pathetic. |
lizzy |
Feb-24-08 05:14 PM |
#2 |
| -
Thank you. |
citizen_jane |
Feb-24-08 05:14 PM |
#3 |
| -
I agree |
shadowknows69 |
Feb-24-08 05:15 PM |
#4 |
| -
I'm suspect of this myself |
yourguide |
Feb-24-08 05:15 PM |
#5 |
| -
Want to bet the GOP was holding onto this story until she got the nod. BTW I agree with you. |
Flabbergasted |
Feb-24-08 05:15 PM |
#6 |
  -
Oh for crying out loud. The story was in her book. |
lizzy |
Feb-24-08 05:17 PM |
#13 |
| -
It would have been used during the GE against her. I also think it's a non-issue. |
Flabbergasted |
Feb-24-08 05:19 PM |
#18 |
| -
Our judicial system supposedly guarantees everyone a fair trial... |
joeybee12 |
Feb-24-08 05:15 PM |
#7 |
| -
Yes, there are a million reasons to dislike Hillary but |
skipos |
Feb-24-08 05:16 PM |
#8 |
| -
agreed n/t |
I Vote In Pittsburgh |
Feb-24-08 05:16 PM |
#9 |
| -
I think I agree with you. |
MH1 |
Feb-24-08 05:16 PM |
#10 |
| -
Attorneys told me they protected civil rights |
sandnsea |
Feb-24-08 05:17 PM |
#11 |
| -
if your client tells you to question something, they usually do |
Magic Rat |
Feb-24-08 05:21 PM |
#25 |
| -
Only if there was real corroboration |
sandnsea |
Feb-24-08 05:27 PM |
#33 |
| -
What witnesses? Do you people even read the article? |
lizzy |
Feb-24-08 05:37 PM |
#43 |
| -
Yes witnesses |
sandnsea |
Feb-24-08 05:45 PM |
#49 |
| -
Completely agree. |
no name no slogan |
Feb-24-08 05:17 PM |
#12 |
| -
I was not fond of this attack for two reasons |
truedelphi |
Feb-24-08 05:17 PM |
#14 |
| -
Your actions as an adult |
yourguide |
Feb-24-08 05:20 PM |
#21 |
| -
Nothing in the article suggested she pushed for a plea deal, nor |
ORDem |
Feb-24-08 05:18 PM |
#15 |
| -
i think it would be hard to determine if she did push for one |
Magic Rat |
Feb-24-08 05:25 PM |
#29 |
| -
Agree 100%. |
scheming daemons |
Feb-24-08 05:18 PM |
#16 |
| -
She at least ought to stop trumpeting her so called |
Zueda |
Feb-24-08 05:18 PM |
#17 |
| -
Ridiculous claim. |
lizzy |
Feb-24-08 05:19 PM |
#19 |
| -
It's not a "claim". Simply a suggestion. |
Zueda |
Feb-24-08 05:22 PM |
#26 |
| -
How about blaming the DA for not doing a better job advocating for the kid? |
PeaceNikki |
Feb-24-08 05:25 PM |
#30 |
| -
the DA |
malletgirl02 |
Feb-24-08 07:41 PM |
#83 |
| -
If I were a lawyer (which I am not), then I would have to |
lizzy |
Feb-24-08 05:40 PM |
#46 |
| -
As I just posted in another topic |
Tarc |
Feb-24-08 05:20 PM |
#22 |
| -
Sure she was just doing her job... |
Zueda |
Feb-24-08 05:28 PM |
#36 |
| -
You really are an idiot if this is the point you're going to try to make hay with here |
Tarc |
Feb-24-08 05:55 PM |
#53 |
| -
You suppose she enjoyed this? |
Zueda |
Feb-24-08 06:14 PM |
#60 |
| -
they have no shame. simple as that. |
rodeodance |
Feb-24-08 06:35 PM |
#72 |
| -
I agree except for one point....... |
tokenlib |
Feb-24-08 05:20 PM |
#20 |
| -
Oh give me a break. |
lizzy |
Feb-24-08 05:21 PM |
#24 |
| -
If the defense attorney does NOT attack the victim's credibilty, what's left? |
Yossariant |
Feb-24-08 05:26 PM |
#31 |
| -
Obama supporter here |
Mme. Defarge |
Feb-24-08 05:21 PM |
#23 |
| -
You're right |
union_maid |
Feb-24-08 05:23 PM |
#27 |
| -
I must be obtuse |
Abacus |
Feb-24-08 05:24 PM |
#28 |
| -
that when you're a lawyer, you start out defending criminals |
Magic Rat |
Feb-24-08 05:26 PM |
#32 |
| -
The 5th and 6th Amendments? |
PeaceNikki |
Feb-24-08 05:27 PM |
#34 |
| -
I never said or implied |
Abacus |
Feb-24-08 05:48 PM |
#51 |
| -
Yes you did. |
PeaceNikki |
Feb-24-08 05:53 PM |
#52 |
| -
No, I didn't. |
Abacus |
Feb-24-08 06:16 PM |
#62 |
| -
Well, you're not even a lawyer at all, are you? |
PeaceNikki |
Feb-24-08 06:22 PM |
#66 |
| -
Of course not. |
Abacus |
Feb-24-08 07:05 PM |
#77 |
| -
I am not an attorney. I've not been schooled on laws and civil rights and responsibilities. |
PeaceNikki |
Feb-24-08 07:26 PM |
#80 |
| -
Alright |
Abacus |
Feb-24-08 07:40 PM |
#82 |
| -
Yes, I "copped out" of your irrelevant and ridiculous hypothetical question |
PeaceNikki |
Feb-24-08 07:47 PM |
#84 |
| -
No, |
Abacus |
Feb-24-08 08:09 PM |
#88 |
| -
The court system requires lawyers to function n/t |
sandnsea |
Feb-24-08 05:28 PM |
#35 |
| -
Suborning perjury is unethical. So is promoting a story you know is false. |
TexasObserver |
Feb-24-08 05:31 PM |
#37 |
| -
cute |
Magic Rat |
Feb-24-08 05:35 PM |
#41 |
| -
I'll prove you are not competent to offer the opinions you have. Right here. |
TexasObserver |
Feb-24-08 06:09 PM |
#58 |
| -
dude, what's your problem? |
Magic Rat |
Feb-24-08 06:14 PM |
#61 |
| -
My problem is your telling people in your OP that this is nothing to be concerned about. |
TexasObserver |
Feb-24-08 06:25 PM |
#67 |
| -
you have 3200 posts in the last 24 days |
Magic Rat |
Feb-24-08 06:36 PM |
#74 |
| -
You can count, too. |
TexasObserver |
Feb-24-08 06:42 PM |
#76 |
| -
Whatever in the world gives you an idea |
lizzy |
Feb-24-08 05:35 PM |
#42 |
| -
You are jumping to conclusions again, |
sandnsea |
Feb-24-08 05:48 PM |
#50 |
| -
No, I'm not. |
TexasObserver |
Feb-24-08 06:12 PM |
#59 |
| -
Where's your proof |
sandnsea |
Feb-24-08 06:20 PM |
#65 |
| -
Not going to waste any more time with you. History has shown it's pointless. |
TexasObserver |
Feb-24-08 06:28 PM |
#68 |
| -
Yeah because you're always wrong |
sandnsea |
Feb-24-08 06:33 PM |
#71 |
| -
You are not listening and you do not want to. |
rodeodance |
Feb-24-08 06:39 PM |
#75 |
| -
Agree -- I didn't even bother reading the article because I could just see |
gateley |
Feb-24-08 05:31 PM |
#38 |
| -
I have an uncontrollable negative reaction to child rape nt |
Truth Hurts A Lot |
Feb-24-08 05:33 PM |
#39 |
| -
I work for a criminal defense attorney and sometimes it sucks what |
pdxmom |
Feb-24-08 05:33 PM |
#40 |
| -
Thank you for explaining this. |
Arkansas Granny |
Feb-24-08 05:37 PM |
#44 |
| -
Agreed |
tammywammy |
Feb-24-08 05:40 PM |
#45 |
| -
A Lawyer that would do this, is not a lawyer that should be President |
Obamaman2008 |
Feb-24-08 05:43 PM |
#47 |
| -
For the last time |
Marie26 |
Feb-24-08 05:57 PM |
#54 |
| -
"She was REQUIRED to accept the case" . . . |
OneBlueSky |
Feb-25-08 04:48 AM |
#92 |
| -
That's the Constitution. |
Marie26 |
Feb-25-08 09:54 AM |
#95 |
| -
Thanks for the clarification |
gravity |
Feb-24-08 05:43 PM |
#48 |
| -
THAS SRE KAOEUPBD OF U RBGS PHAPBLG-EUBG RAT |
Straight Shooter |
Feb-24-08 06:01 PM |
#55 |
| -
THA*U / SRE -CH |
Magic Rat |
Feb-24-08 06:08 PM |
#57 |
| -
. |
Straight Shooter |
Feb-24-08 06:17 PM |
#63 |
| -
Agreed. And let's not forget that 1975 was a very different time |
thecatburgler |
Feb-24-08 06:05 PM |
#56 |
| -
yes, its all pretty much BS |
1awake |
Feb-24-08 06:19 PM |
#64 |
| -
Why let the facts about the court system get in the way of hyperbole? |
Midlodemocrat |
Feb-24-08 06:30 PM |
#69 |
| -
same poster just posted a second one -same story. can't we stop this? |
rodeodance |
Feb-24-08 06:31 PM |
#70 |
| -
MR--thank you so much. |
rodeodance |
Feb-24-08 06:36 PM |
#73 |
| -
You earned appreciation for this thread, knowing some of your other feelings |
Tom Rinaldo |
Feb-24-08 07:22 PM |
#78 |
| -
I agree |
malletgirl02 |
Feb-24-08 07:25 PM |
#79 |
| -
If my daugher were raped I wouldn't care: I'd want to smash that defense attorney's head in |
ButterflyBlood |
Feb-24-08 07:33 PM |
#81 |
| -
The defense attorney and not the accused? Not the DA? |
PeaceNikki |
Feb-24-08 07:49 PM |
#85 |
| -
The accused too |
ButterflyBlood |
Feb-24-08 07:50 PM |
#86 |
| -
And you would have every reason to want to do that... |
Hippo_Tron |
Feb-25-08 05:01 AM |
#94 |
| -
I agree, it's a lawyers job to do everything they can for their client, no matter what their own |
RunningFromCongress |
Feb-24-08 08:00 PM |
#87 |
| -
Another nod of agreement here. |
rexy |
Feb-24-08 08:13 PM |
#89 |
| -
thank you magic rat |
comradebillyboy |
Feb-24-08 10:05 PM |
#90 |
| -
I posted this in the attack thread, but I'll post it here also. As an Obama supporter, I support |
peacebaby3 |
Feb-25-08 12:54 AM |
#91 |
| -
I couldn't agree more |
donheld |
Feb-25-08 04:52 AM |
#93 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread