mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-22-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 20. Exactly. Barack Obama in essence is every bit as much DLC as Hillary, maybe more |
| -Hillary Clinton is the DLC candidate |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 10:12 PM |
#0 |
 -
She sure is DLC and many of her supporters sound like right wing .... |
Hieronymus |
Feb-22-08 10:40 PM |
#1 |
  -
which camp says we musn't 'demonize' republicans? |
bigtree |
Feb-22-08 11:04 PM |
#12 |
| -
hilary's kinda keepin' that shit underwraps.. |
zidzi |
Feb-22-08 10:42 PM |
#2 |
| -
It is time to back off and give it a rest. nt. |
Warren Stupidity |
Feb-22-08 10:46 PM |
#3 |
| -
Not sure I follow, Warren Stupidity |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 10:49 PM |
#5 |
| -
Lets make it as easy as possible for our Clinton DU'ers to |
Warren Stupidity |
Feb-22-08 10:53 PM |
#6 |
| -
Explain how discussing our Democratic Presidential candidates' ties to the DLC |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:01 PM |
#10 |
| -
Never mind. It was obviously a silly idea. |
Warren Stupidity |
Feb-22-08 11:02 PM |
#11 |
| -
Most seasoned DUers are fully aware of the PNAC-DLC connection |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:12 PM |
#13 |
| -
What disagreements does Obama have with the DLC? |
jackson_dem |
Feb-22-08 10:49 PM |
#4 |
| -
Very few, if any. The DLC finds Barack very appealing |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:00 PM |
#9 |
| -
The DLC - PNAC connection: Will Marshall |
Swamp Rat |
Feb-22-08 10:57 PM |
#7 |
| -
. |
Emit |
Feb-23-08 08:07 PM |
#54 |
| -
The DLC loves Obama and there is a reason for that |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 10:58 PM |
#8 |
| -
Yup. It is amazing those who hate the DLC in the blogosphere are blind to this |
jackson_dem |
Feb-22-08 11:17 PM |
#14 |
| -
Check out this DLC-Barack Obama connection: |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:23 PM |
#16 |
| -
I posted that in my OP -- did you even read it? |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:31 PM |
#19 |
| -
Then why did you limit the thread just to Hillary?? |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:38 PM |
#23 |
| -
It is exactly the same |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:56 PM |
#34 |
| -
And I would bet that frustrates Clinton to no end n/t |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:18 PM |
#15 |
| -
No. The people it frustrates will be some of Obama's supporters who never realized how DLC he is n/t |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:31 PM |
#18 |
| -
Hence my post. |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:32 PM |
# |
| -
Well then why does your headline exclude Obama when he's as DLC, even as indicated by here. |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:42 PM |
#24 |
| -
Because he's not a member |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:51 PM |
#29 |
| -
yeah, because he's not a member "technically". In essence, he's as DLC as any candidate |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:53 PM |
#30 |
| -
No, he's not |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:53 PM |
#32 |
| -
"No, he's not But could be. That's my point." Well why not put the entire thing in the subject line? |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:57 PM |
#35 |
| -
Hillary IS DLC |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:59 PM |
#38 |
| -
and Obama is very DLC-like. You and I have both proven that already. |
mtnsnake |
Feb-23-08 12:07 AM |
#42 |
| -
I would hope everyone would read every last point any poster makes inside an OP |
Emit |
Feb-23-08 12:18 AM |
#45 |
| -
It's frustrating, isn't it? |
Emit |
Feb-23-08 12:05 AM |
#40 |
| -
"both of our Dem candidates have connections to the DLC which has connections to PNAC" |
mtnsnake |
Feb-23-08 12:16 AM |
#43 |
| -
Any luck with your thread there? |
Emit |
Feb-23-08 01:36 PM |
#53 |
| -
why are you only broadcasting HIllary in your headline!! |
rodeodance |
Feb-22-08 11:48 PM |
#27 |
| -
Because she heads the DLC's American Dream Initiative |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:53 PM |
#31 |
| -
It's not always just about HRC |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:57 PM |
#36 |
| -
That's right, but around these parts everyone likes to exclude Obama from all his obvious DLC appeal |
mtnsnake |
Feb-23-08 12:04 AM |
#39 |
| -
Having DLC appeal and being a card carrying member is different, IMHO |
Emit |
Feb-23-08 12:07 AM |
#41 |
| -
Seriously, though, she's been carrying the water for the DLC for two decades. |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:50 PM |
#28 |
| -
Says you. n/t |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:55 PM |
#33 |
| -
Yeah, it's my opinion |
Emit |
Feb-23-08 01:09 PM |
#50 |
| -
You don't get to be a frontrunner unless you are big money friendly |
eridani |
Feb-22-08 11:31 PM |
#17 |
| -
Exactly. Barack Obama in essence is every bit as much DLC as Hillary, maybe more |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:32 PM |
#20 |
| -
I disagree that he is more |
Emit |
Feb-22-08 11:33 PM |
#21 |
| -
I said "maybe more". Connected officially or not, his agenda is very DLCish |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:44 PM |
#25 |
| -
Where do I find this information on dlc.org? |
WilyWondr |
Feb-22-08 11:47 PM |
#26 |
| -
Did someone say he's a card carrying member? |
mtnsnake |
Feb-22-08 11:58 PM |
#37 |
| -
this just in- the sky is blue, and water is wet... |
QuestionAll |
Feb-22-08 11:34 PM |
#22 |
| -
Best reason seen tonight not to vote for her. |
ErnestoG |
Feb-23-08 12:17 AM |
#44 |
| -
Then you should reconsider why you're voting for Obama, who leans toward a DLC agenda with the best |
mtnsnake |
Feb-23-08 09:00 AM |
#46 |
| -
Obama and Clinton do not appear to be equally DLC |
Emit |
Feb-23-08 10:38 AM |
#49 |
| -
Bump |
Mystery2Me |
Feb-23-08 09:47 AM |
#47 |
| -
Shillary is to DLC |
nebula |
Feb-23-08 09:58 AM |
#48 |
| -
They're both DLC approved. Better get used to the fact. |
last1standing |
Feb-23-08 01:15 PM |
#51 |
| -
And that is only partially my point |
Emit |
Feb-23-08 01:26 PM |
#52 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread