You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: It's the media, stupid. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's the media, stupid.
No, I'm not calling you stupid. It's a good question. My take is that the media, news media presents negative items against Republicans in a "they both do it" light.

This leaves people thinking that both sides are the same. So, they choose based on looks or whatever. Here Republicans have the advantage by having paid staff in media positions. Some give "speeches." Some have cush jobs. Some work on book deals. Some just want to keep their jobs and rise quickly to a good income. They know what they need to say, and what they cannot say.

Saying bad things about liberals is rewarded. Saying bad things about Conservatives means that other person might get the next promotion. So, the public ends up hearing both sides are the same plus liberals are bad.

Plenty of people see past this. Too many are fooled.

Add in that Conservatives own airwaves out in rural areas, the only competition from easily bought religious broadcasters. The people only hear half the message. And, when you look at the demographics of Bush's "win" you see the red states by county take up more land. That's land with fewer people and fewer media choices.

You have Internet, radio, and several TV choices. Others don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -I never thought Bush would win last time; does Bush have a stronger Madame_Bovary  Mar-18-04 09:53 AM   #0 
  - Don't be silly  Atman   Mar-18-04 10:00 AM   #1 
  - My theory on Nader is that he will try to atone for 2000 by  sadiesworld   Mar-18-04 10:07 AM   #2 
     - I hope we don't get screwed again.  Madame_Bovary   Mar-18-04 10:10 AM   #3 
     - Cannot agree.  Sinistrous   Mar-18-04 10:11 AM   #4 
     - I know, I waited for it in 2000...  sadiesworld   Mar-18-04 10:14 AM   #5 
     - I am dreaming w/ ya SW. I think this is the plan, I really do. nt  caledesi   Mar-18-04 11:16 AM   #9 
  - of course, I start with knowing that George Bush did not win in 2000  cosmicdot   Mar-18-04 10:26 AM   #6 
  - Don't underestimate the influence of  Gildor Inglorion   Mar-18-04 10:26 AM   #7 
  - He didn't win - SCOTUS selected him. nt  caledesi   Mar-18-04 11:16 AM   #8 
  - major/big media = (Republican Party) state media, imho. (n/t)  w4rma   Mar-18-04 12:44 PM   #10 
  - BushCo owns the voting machines . . .  OneBlueSky   Mar-18-04 01:05 PM   #11 
  - It's the media, stupid.  Festivito   Mar-18-04 04:32 PM   #12 
  - He has a record now.  Monte Carlo   Mar-18-04 04:43 PM   #13 
  - He has the South  TomSeaverr   Mar-18-04 04:48 PM   #14 
  - Bush didn't win last time  jsw_81   Mar-18-04 04:55 PM   #15 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC