ShadowLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-20-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
| 33. Yes of course, just not a woman with a 50% unfavorable rating |
| -Will there ever be a Woman President |
Mags |
Feb-20-08 12:52 PM |
#0 |
 -
Yes.... just not Hillary..... |
scheming daemons |
Feb-20-08 12:54 PM |
#1 |
  -
Yes, it will be Christine Gregoire |
Yurem2008 |
Feb-20-08 12:57 PM |
#11 |
| -
. |
XemaSab |
Feb-20-08 01:09 PM |
#28 |
| -
OR Barbara Boxer |
Capn Sunshine |
Feb-20-08 01:23 PM |
#38 |
| -
It won't be Granholm... |
COFoothills |
Feb-20-08 01:28 PM |
#45 |
| -
a jewish woman? I think that will be tough |
Moh96 |
Feb-20-08 03:48 PM |
#71 |
| -
Judge Judy For President |
donheld |
Feb-20-08 04:39 PM |
#91 |
| -
I would love to vote for Barbara Boxer. |
totodeinhere |
Feb-20-08 05:11 PM |
#100 |
| -
i don't know her that well, but |
Whisp |
Feb-20-08 01:30 PM |
#47 |
| -
She has her share of detractors |
FlyingSquirrel |
Feb-20-08 03:45 PM |
#67 |
| -
Huh. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Feb-20-08 12:54 PM |
#2 |
| -
I have many reasons to vote for Hillary. This is just a question |
Mags |
Feb-20-08 12:56 PM |
#9 |
| -
Then who do you have in mind? |
Mags |
Feb-20-08 12:55 PM |
#3 |
| -
Janet Napolitano would make an excellent president. |
Alexander |
Feb-20-08 04:11 PM |
#82 |
| -
yes. me :-) |
loveangelc |
Feb-20-08 12:55 PM |
#4 |
| -
Good questions-- I wonder myself |
ailsagirl |
Feb-20-08 12:55 PM |
#5 |
| -
Absolutely. |
sparosnare |
Feb-20-08 12:55 PM |
#6 |
| -
By no means give up. But so long as it's okay to call her 'Nurse Ratched', 'Madam DeFarge,' 'Lady- |
MookieWilson |
Feb-20-08 12:55 PM |
#7 |
| -
No |
557188 |
Feb-20-08 12:55 PM |
#8 |
| -
Woman, yes, Women no |
Taverner |
Feb-20-08 12:56 PM |
#10 |
| -
I noticed that too. |
No Surrender |
Feb-20-08 12:57 PM |
#12 |
| -
Thanks for your correction.!! |
Mags |
Feb-20-08 12:57 PM |
#13 |
| -
Pundits have always said that the first woman president will be a Republican. |
BuyingThyme |
Feb-20-08 12:59 PM |
#14 |
| -
Who? Mrs Dole or Hutchison? |
Yurem2008 |
Feb-20-08 01:00 PM |
#17 |
| -
Kathleen Sebelius, Claire McCaskill |
Bullet1987 |
Feb-20-08 12:59 PM |
#15 |
| -
Sebelius and McClaskill are excellent! |
Yurem2008 |
Feb-20-08 01:01 PM |
#18 |
| -
yes. Maybe Janet Napoliano or Christine Gregoire |
orangepeel68 |
Feb-20-08 01:03 PM |
#21 |
| -
Gregoire has a lot of guts |
Yurem2008 |
Feb-20-08 01:14 PM |
#31 |
| -
Hillabee??????? |
Beacool |
Feb-20-08 04:29 PM |
#89 |
| -
Napalitano and Sebelius are both very good. |
Bleachers7 |
Feb-20-08 03:59 PM |
#77 |
| -
Seconded. I'd vote for either in a heartbeat. Barbara Boxer too. |
Alexander |
Feb-20-08 04:12 PM |
#83 |
| -
yeah, someone who hasn't been on the natnl scene long enought for the MSM to tear down, like O. |
VotesForWomen |
Feb-20-08 03:43 PM |
#66 |
| -
If this forum has any decision in it, then the answer is no. |
goldcanyonaz |
Feb-20-08 12:59 PM |
#16 |
| -
. |
Umbram |
Feb-20-08 01:17 PM |
#34 |
| -
I don't think in my lifetime. I will be 50 next month. n/t |
calico1 |
Feb-20-08 01:23 PM |
#39 |
| -
Unlikely in our lifetime if Hillary falls. |
onehandle |
Feb-20-08 01:01 PM |
#19 |
| -
I don't see how Hillary gets tarred as a scapegoat. |
crispini |
Feb-20-08 09:39 PM |
#105 |
| -
if they run a better campaign, yes. She had the lead and her campaign shot itself in the foot |
Lerkfish |
Feb-20-08 01:03 PM |
#20 |
| -
Negative ads don't work well for Democrats in general |
orangepeel68 |
Feb-20-08 01:05 PM |
#23 |
| -
IMHO people would vote for a woman because she brought something different to the table |
Lerkfish |
Feb-20-08 01:24 PM |
#40 |
| -
i agree that her campaign could have been better, but to deny the media coverage slanted in favor of |
VotesForWomen |
Feb-20-08 03:46 PM |
#69 |
| -
I would respectfully disagree: the worst victims of the media were Edwards and Kucinich |
Lerkfish |
Feb-20-08 03:51 PM |
#73 |
| -
possible, but isn't it sad that you will vote for her only because of her gender? |
Johnny__Motown |
Feb-20-08 01:05 PM |
#22 |
| -
Read post #9. Thank you |
Mags |
Feb-20-08 01:08 PM |
#26 |
| -
you turned this into a post about a woman president. you give no other reasons |
Johnny__Motown |
Feb-20-08 01:10 PM |
#29 |
| -
I don't have to have a reason. It was just a simple question. |
Mags |
Feb-20-08 01:31 PM |
#48 |
| -
You have a life expectancy of around 80 years |
housewolf |
Feb-20-08 01:06 PM |
#24 |
| -
Of course! |
RandomKoolzip |
Feb-20-08 01:07 PM |
#25 |
| -
That's pretty degading of women I think. Only Hillary. Only now? |
alphafemale |
Feb-20-08 01:09 PM |
#27 |
| -
I doubt it in MY lifetime. I of course hae my own qualifications |
napi21 |
Feb-20-08 01:11 PM |
#30 |
| -
Condaleeza Rice |
crawfish |
Feb-20-08 01:14 PM |
#32 |
| -
I think the OP meant a woman with half a brain |
subsuelo |
Feb-20-08 03:35 PM |
#63 |
| -
I think Condi meets that qualification |
JustABozoOnThisBus |
Feb-20-08 05:09 PM |
#99 |
| -
Yes of course, just not a woman with a 50% unfavorable rating |
ShadowLiberal |
Feb-20-08 01:16 PM |
#33 |
| -
it will happen someday |
marions ghost |
Feb-20-08 01:18 PM |
#35 |
| -
I think it's more that people are threatened by strong women. |
Midlodemocrat |
Feb-20-08 01:34 PM |
#49 |
| -
Yes, and one who built her career herself |
dmesg |
Feb-20-08 01:19 PM |
#36 |
| -
I'd favor someone on the order of |
shraby |
Feb-20-08 01:19 PM |
#37 |
| -
I am looking forward to us having a woman as president... |
COFoothills |
Feb-20-08 01:24 PM |
#41 |
| -
Sure, but not a DLC member. Just not enough union support. |
billyoc |
Feb-20-08 01:26 PM |
#42 |
| -
A man.....any color.. ..is... STILL a man ~ |
indimuse |
Feb-20-08 01:26 PM |
#43 |
| -
Changing the genitals in the white house is not change enough.... |
GOTV |
Feb-20-08 04:19 PM |
#86 |
| -
Yup, Margaret Thatcher was a nurturing change for world wide peace. |
lapfog_1 |
Feb-20-08 10:08 PM |
#108 |
| -
I understand that feeling, I think. |
Orsino |
Feb-20-08 01:26 PM |
#44 |
| -
It is most likely to be a woman not currently on our radar screen |
orangepeel68 |
Feb-20-08 01:29 PM |
#46 |
| -
Agree. |
crispini |
Feb-20-08 09:41 PM |
#106 |
| -
Not in our lifetime. And not until at least one woman holds a share of the MSM. |
Iceburg |
Feb-20-08 01:34 PM |
#50 |
| -
What HAS Obama changed? |
indimuse |
Feb-20-08 01:38 PM |
#51 |
| -
After seeing the misogyny here and elsewhere - I'm beginning to think no |
kerry-is-my-prez |
Feb-20-08 01:41 PM |
#52 |
| -
There is a lot of misandry right here in this thread. |
lapfog_1 |
Feb-20-08 10:14 PM |
#111 |
| -
Yes - and I will not tell you to not support Hillary, but don't do it just because she is a woman |
Exilednight |
Feb-20-08 01:48 PM |
#53 |
| -
Better chance of that then a ever getting a populist candidate who isn't owned by mega-corps. |
newportdadde |
Feb-20-08 01:50 PM |
#54 |
| -
correct; and that applies to obama as well. he is not what people think he is. nt |
VotesForWomen |
Feb-20-08 03:48 PM |
#70 |
| -
I had thought so |
MonkeyFunk |
Feb-20-08 01:51 PM |
#55 |
| -
now you understand... |
marions ghost |
Feb-20-08 03:30 PM |
#59 |
| -
a very sad one, yes |
MonkeyFunk |
Feb-20-08 03:55 PM |
#75 |
| -
will anyone other than a Clinton or Bush be president in my lifetime |
Magic Rat |
Feb-20-08 01:52 PM |
#56 |
| -
Hillary deserves it, don't you know? Her being wife to Bill qualifies her as a presidential candidat |
GarbagemanLB |
Feb-20-08 03:35 PM |
#64 |
| -
No. Not in my lifetime, or yours. Sorry to say that, |
Notorious Bohemian |
Feb-20-08 01:53 PM |
#57 |
| -
as soon as Hillary isn't on the ticket |
formernaderite |
Feb-20-08 01:57 PM |
#58 |
| -
How are your eating habits? Do you smoke? |
RUMMYisFROSTED |
Feb-20-08 03:31 PM |
#60 |
| -
My dad always said |
leftynyc |
Feb-20-08 03:32 PM |
#61 |
| -
You are pathetic if your reason for supporting Hillary is her sex. Talk about stupid politics. |
GarbagemanLB |
Feb-20-08 03:34 PM |
#62 |
| -
i'm sure you'd say the same if there had never been a male president. yeah, no you wouldn't, nt |
VotesForWomen |
Feb-20-08 03:58 PM |
#76 |
| -
So I take it you'll be voting for Condi Rice in the future? |
Alexander |
Feb-20-08 04:09 PM |
#81 |
| -
Was this Sean Hannity's talking point of the day? Or did you think this one up on your own? |
apocalypsehow |
Feb-20-08 03:42 PM |
#65 |
| -
I may see one... |
Blue_In_AK |
Feb-20-08 03:46 PM |
#68 |
| -
No, I don't think so. The scab has been peeled off |
LisaM |
Feb-20-08 03:50 PM |
#72 |
| -
hard to say... |
paulk |
Feb-20-08 03:53 PM |
#74 |
| -
Yes. Just not this one. |
Alexander |
Feb-20-08 04:01 PM |
#78 |
| -
Michelle Obama. A new dynasty is born. |
milkyway |
Feb-20-08 04:06 PM |
#79 |
| -
Why do you want a candidate *just* because she's a women? |
RoadRage |
Feb-20-08 04:06 PM |
#80 |
| -
Ditto on the write in. n/t |
BlackVelvet04 |
Feb-20-08 04:12 PM |
#84 |
| -
here it comes.... |
BlackVelvet04 |
Feb-20-08 04:17 PM |
#85 |
| -
Absolutely. If Barbara Boxer was running, I might be in her corner |
Vinca |
Feb-20-08 04:23 PM |
#87 |
| -
I Won't Vote For A Woman |
lse7581011 |
Feb-20-08 04:26 PM |
#88 |
| -
Oh gawd, not this meme |
WolverineDG |
Feb-20-08 04:36 PM |
#90 |
| -
This election has proven that sexism trumps racism. |
Beacool |
Feb-20-08 04:42 PM |
#92 |
| -
it doesn't have to be that way |
paperbag_ princess |
Feb-20-08 05:02 PM |
#93 |
| -
Baloney. I would love a woman president, I just have to like and trust her. |
babylonsister |
Feb-20-08 05:05 PM |
#96 |
| -
Yes. There was only one reason a woman didn't win this time. |
Life Long Dem |
Feb-20-08 05:04 PM |
#94 |
| -
And from where I'm sitting |
MonkeyFunk |
Feb-20-08 05:05 PM |
#97 |
| -
Yes. It just won't be Hillary Rodham Cinton. |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-20-08 05:04 PM |
#95 |
| -
There are better women than Hillary in the Democratic Party |
IndianaGreen |
Feb-20-08 05:08 PM |
#98 |
| -
I think if McCain wins he will have sex change operations during his first year. |
balantz |
Feb-20-08 05:12 PM |
#101 |
| -
Nope. Little by little the b8llsh*t innuendos and code words slip in |
bluedawg12 |
Feb-20-08 05:14 PM |
#102 |
| -
I don't think so.... |
jbm |
Feb-20-08 09:35 PM |
#103 |
| -
Yes. 2016, probably. |
TexasObserver |
Feb-20-08 09:37 PM |
#104 |
| -
Yes, when people stop waiting for Clinton |
Bad Thoughts |
Feb-20-08 09:45 PM |
#107 |
| -
Of course there will be a woman president one of these days. |
protect our future |
Feb-20-08 10:10 PM |
#109 |
| -
Not a Democrat. Maybe a Condi Rice. Maybe not even her. |
readmoreoften |
Feb-20-08 10:13 PM |
#110 |
| -
Nope, not in this lifetime... |
Sybbis |
Feb-20-08 10:20 PM |
#112 |
| -
Yes, but when it does happen it won't be one of the most famous and widely disliked women in the USA |
JVS |
Feb-20-08 10:28 PM |
#113 |
| -
Maybe Chelsea Clinton will get into |
doc03 |
Feb-20-08 10:33 PM |
#114 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread