Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Get with it, Obama voted FOR NAFTA! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Clinton Crusader (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Feb-19-08 05:31 PM
Original message
Get with it, Obama voted FOR NAFTA!
Advertisements [?]
"Obama Says He Will Vote for NAFTA Expansion" at: http://tinyurl.com/29rovu

Obama is the first presidential candidate to officially declare his/her support for the NAFTA expansion moving through the Congress. His announcement is not necessarily surprising, considering he was the keynote speaker at the launch of the Hamilton Project -- a Wall Street front group working to DRIVE A WEDGE between Democrats and organized LABOR on globalization issues. His announcement comes just days after a Wall Street Journal poll found strong bipartisan opposition to lobbyist-written NAFTA-style trade policies. Clinton and Obama vote for Peru NAFTA deal at: http://tinyurl.com/2qn59q

Vote for Barack Obama if you want to, but please do it with your eyes open and with the knowledge that Rupert Murdoch -- possibly the worst corporate media CEO around -- has endorsed Obama and is using all the resources of his media empire to help Obama and destroy Hillary Clinton (one has to wonder what Rupert Murdoch hopes to gain from an Obama presidency and fears from a Clinton presidency). And bear in mind that Obama chose as his senate "mentor" the loathsome Joe Lieberman, whose gleefulness in voting with the Republicans and against the Democrats made Lieberman (at the time Obama chose him as his mentor) one of the most despised Democrats in the senate. When Barack Obama had the chance to vote against NAFTA, he voted, instead, to expand NAFTA.

And, Obama voted FOR the Oman Free Trade Agreement. (H.R. 3045, 7/28/05; S. 3569, 6/29/06). OBAMA: "I believe that expanding trade and breaking down barriers between countries is good for our economy and for our security, for American consumers and American workers.
http://www.aflcio.org/issues/politics/issues_trade.cfm

BOTH Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama voted NO on implementing CAFTA for Central America free-trade. (Jul 2005) Americans need to deal with facts, not pipe-dreams. In Peru Trade Vote, Senate Democrats Break With Base, Dismiss Widespread Public Opposition to More-of-the-Same Trade Policy and Join GOP to Vote for Another Bush NAFTA Expansion Pushed by Corporations. Seven of Nine Senate Freshmen Democrats Oppose Expanding NAFTA to Peru

Statement of Lori M. Wallach, Director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch Division

Public Citizen - Common Dreams - Dec. 4, 2007
WASHINGTON - December 4 - Although not one U.S. labor, environmental, Latino, consumer, faith or family farm group supported the Peru free trade agreement (FTA), a majority of Senate Democrats today broke with their base, dismissed widespread public opposition to more-of-the-same trade policy and joined Republicans to deliver another Bush NAFTA expansion to the large corporations pushing this deal.
The debate in the Senate contrasts with that in the House of Representatives last month. There was little focus on the Peru NAFTA expansion deal in the Senate, but in the House an intense, multi-month debate resulted in a majority of House Democrats, including 12 of 18 House committee chairs, voting against the Peru pact and signaling that it is not an acceptable model for future trade agreements.
The breakdown of this vote vividly demonstrates two phenomena: the distance between most senators and the American public on trade issues, and the depth of the American public's negative opinion about NAFTA-style trade deals. All but two of nine Democratic freshmen senators who recently campaigned extensively in their states opposed the Peru NAFTA expansion today. Most of the Democratic presidential candidates oppose it, including Sens. Joseph Biden of Delaware and Chris Dodd of Connecticut.

In contrast to most of the Democratic presidential candidates who oppose the Peru NAFTA expansion, Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois support it. Clinton and Obama's support for the Peru FTA – after BOTH opposed the 2005 Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), which contained identical provisions and now campaign against NAFTA in Iowa, should make voters wonder just what sort of trade policy Clinton and Obama really support. None of the senators running for president voted today, although all four have issued public statements taking positions on the Peru pact. Read the rest at: http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/1204-20.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  Get with it, Obama voted FOR NAFTA! Clinton Crusader  Feb-19-08 05:31 PM   #0 
   The Clintons will forever be tied with NAFTA. Deal with it. It is much easier to tie them to it than  GarbagemanLB   Feb-19-08 05:32 PM   #1 
   Please leave the candidates' sex lives out of this. n/t  IanDB1   Feb-19-08 05:32 PM   #2 
   Al Gore is the guy who actually defended NAFTA in a national debate with Ross Perot  Tom Rinaldo   Feb-19-08 05:34 PM   #4 
   I was a little ashamed of Gore for that one.  anamandujano   Feb-19-08 05:59 PM   #28 
   And whose little sockpuppet are YOU?  Bluebear   Feb-19-08 05:35 PM   #7 
      I think he supported Sen Clinton last time before he got kicked out. nm  rhett o rick   Feb-20-08 12:45 AM   #40 
   Again? How desperate are you? The Peru agreement is not the Clintons' NAFTA  ProSense   Feb-19-08 05:33 PM   #3 
   Obama on NAFTA  rinsd   Feb-19-08 05:35 PM   #6 
   Obama never said he was against trade deals, just horrible ones like Clinton's NAFTA. n/t  ProSense   Feb-19-08 05:39 PM   #11 
      Except Obama didn't say he was against NAFTA.  rinsd   Feb-19-08 05:46 PM   #20 
         And except that he has supported other deals like NAFTA, including Peru just three months ago!  jackson_dem   Feb-19-08 05:50 PM   #22 
   desperate ??--AGAIN-OH NO!  rodeodance   Feb-19-08 05:37 PM   #8 
   I have NEVER heard Hillary defend NAFTA, I did hear her  bellasgrams   Feb-19-08 05:43 PM   #13 
   I have to say this in defense of anyone who voted for NAFTA - or supported  gateley   Feb-19-08 05:35 PM   #5 
   The candidates have discussed a variety of remedies.  rinsd   Feb-19-08 05:37 PM   #9 
   Thanks rinsd --  gateley   Feb-19-08 05:43 PM   #14 
   Good to see you as well.  rinsd   Feb-19-08 05:44 PM   #16 
   Hillary is for a timeout and ressassment of all deals, Obama will resassess only NAFTA  jackson_dem   Feb-19-08 05:52 PM   #24 
   The point is, NOW is too late.  bvar22   Feb-19-08 08:10 PM   #37 
   Murdoch is backing Clinton, NOT Obama.  Skwmom   Feb-19-08 05:39 PM   #10 
   True.  GarbagemanLB   Feb-19-08 05:44 PM   #17 
   Murdock endorsed BO! He also donated to Hillary early before  bellasgrams   Feb-19-08 05:48 PM   #21 
   It's spelled "MURDOCH" and he did no such thing.  rateyes   Feb-19-08 05:53 PM   #26 
   His flagship US paper endorsed Obama, his major UK paper called him the new JFK  jackson_dem   Feb-19-08 05:52 PM   #25 
   Murdoch fears Clinton? Is that why he gave her money?  heraldsqure   Feb-19-08 05:41 PM   #12 
   Rupert Murdoch did not endorse Obama....  rateyes   Feb-19-08 05:44 PM   #15 
   You seriously think that Rupert Murdoch would let his editorial board over rule his own choice?  Tom Rinaldo   Feb-19-08 05:51 PM   #23 
      Bullshit. I just posted the most recent FEC disclosures...  rateyes   Feb-19-08 05:58 PM   #27 
      Media endorsement is a more powerful message. New York Post endorsed Obama.  Straight Shooter   Feb-19-08 06:03 PM   #32 
      I didn't say he endorsed Hillary. I said he DIDN'T endorse Obama.  rateyes   Feb-19-08 09:11 PM   #38 
      July 2006. Exactly  Tom Rinaldo   Feb-19-08 06:06 PM   #34 
      The in kind contribution of an endorsement from a major newspaper far outweighs anything  tritsofme   Feb-19-08 06:16 PM   #35 
         He did a damned fundraiser,  rateyes   Feb-19-08 09:13 PM   #39 
      And, where's his contribution to any of the Republicans?  rateyes   Feb-19-08 06:00 PM   #29 
   Bush, Sr. Salinas and Mulroney  amborin   Feb-19-08 05:45 PM   #18 
   true progressives have no candidate to support  leftofthedial   Feb-19-08 05:45 PM   #19 
   Picky! Picky! Picky!  anamandujano   Feb-19-08 06:02 PM   #30 
   Someone needs to tell this to msnbs - they are talking about how  pirhana   Feb-19-08 06:03 PM   #31 
   It wouldn't matter,  seasonedblue   Feb-19-08 06:05 PM   #33 
   Yep, he's a huge hypocrite with nothing to offer for the American economy.  shenmue   Feb-19-08 06:29 PM   #36 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC