You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: Attacking someone as an "elitist" is a standard Republican talking point. Of course, Republican [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Attacking someone as an "elitist" is a standard Republican talking point. Of course, Republican
talking points are much more acceptable around here than they used to be.

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2005/10/b1120221...

Think Again: “Elitism? Moi?”

By Eric Alterman

October 20, 2005

A key talking point in recent political history has been the right-wing attack on what its members term “elitists,” those evil people, almost always liberal, urban, well-educated or in the entertainment business, who are always telling honest, God-fearing, NASCAR-lovin’ Americans how to behave. The “Liberalism equals Elitism” equation appears to fit almost any occasion. In a book he authored, but which was ghosted by David Brooks, Rush Limbaugh posited his own success as an example of what he terms “middle America’s growing rejection of the elites.” He defines said elites as “professionals” and “experts,” including “the medical elites, the sociological elites, the education elites, the legal elites, the science elites … and the ideas this bunch promotes through the media.”

Bernard Goldberg, who has spent a career working within what conservatives would call the “liberal media elite,” has sworn off all association with liberals “even when he agrees with them,” he says, “because of their elitism. They look down their snobby noses at ordinary Americans who eat at Red Lobster or because they like to bowl or they go to church on a regular basis or because they fly the flag on the Fourth of July.”

Radio talk show host and former cable conservative blonde babe, Laura Ingraham, has authored an entire book on this topic, entitled, Shut Up and Sing: How Elites from Hollywood, Politics, and the UN are Subverting America, in which Laura, who attended an Ivy League university, lives in Washington, D.c=, where she drops in on gay dance clubs, and occasionally treats herself to a ride on Robert DeNiro’s private plane, distinguishes between liberal elitists and what she terms “True Americans.” The latter, it seems, “believe in God, own guns, and want limited government,” and “want to place God in public schools and in public life. (p. 13) … Generally speaking these admirable folks tend to be white, southern, Christian, and Republican,” (p. 32, 63) as opposed to liberal elites who “would like to ‘murder’ America and make the world safe for terrorism” (p. 74), while living “in palaces invisible from the road outside, and fly in private jets, while their managers and assistants tell them only what they want to hear" (p. 17).

John Podhoretz, a former speechwriter for Bush the Elder, who grew up on the Upper West Side, the son of prominent liberals-turned-neoconservatives, and attended Ivy League schools before finding jobs working for Sun Myung Moon, Rupert Murdoch and George H.W. Bush, sees the world through similarly rose-hued glasses as those of Ingraham. “Bush Red is a simpler place,” he explains, after watching people at play in Las Vegas; it’s a land “where people mourn the death of NASCAR champion Dale Earnhardt, root lustily for their teams, go to church, and find comfort in old-fashioned verities.”

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hillary Rosen: Clinton apologist on Hardball bluestateguy  Feb-15-08 06:28 PM   #0 
  - Did you get it?  tyne   Feb-15-08 06:31 PM   #1 
  - Was that the one mumbling and stumbling around trying to explain why it was okay for Hill to cheat?  K Gardner   Feb-15-08 06:33 PM   #2 
  - Yeah, that was her......  alteredstate   Feb-15-08 06:34 PM   #5 
  - I saw her.  progdog   Feb-15-08 06:33 PM   #3 
  - He kind of knocked her off her game (either Tweety or Ed S.)  LSparkle   Feb-15-08 06:55 PM   #8 
  - At least she's not as bad as Kiki McLean.  bunnies   Feb-15-08 06:34 PM   #4 
  - Exactly  progdog   Feb-15-08 06:36 PM   #6 
     - Or Kirsten Powers, that twit who passes for a "Dem strategist" on Faux  LSparkle   Feb-15-08 06:55 PM   #9 
  - Clinton has apologists and Obama has enthusiastic backers.  tritsofme   Feb-15-08 06:45 PM   #7 
  - Bingo!  rinsd   Feb-15-08 06:56 PM   #10 
  - Great post!  cat_girl25   Feb-15-08 07:12 PM   #14 
  - Still love that picture....  rinsd   Feb-15-08 07:13 PM   #15 
  - Amen!  carlotta   Feb-15-08 07:24 PM   #17 
  - Both you and tritsofme of great posts.  AX10   Feb-15-08 07:36 PM   #18 
  - Good one!  NastyRiffraff   Feb-15-08 07:41 PM   #19 
  - Exactly !!  K Gardner   Feb-15-08 06:56 PM   #11 
  - "Elitist" is the right word  LostInAnomie   Feb-15-08 07:00 PM   #12 
  - Elitist, she should fit right in then on the elitist network  Freida5   Feb-15-08 07:04 PM   #13 
  - Attacking someone as an "elitist" is a standard Republican talking point. Of course, Republican  Karmadillo   Feb-15-08 07:23 PM   #16 
  - So what? They're still "elitists" in  zidzi   Feb-15-08 07:45 PM   #21 
  - Hey, Republicans don't own the word, I use it not too infrequently  Hill_YesWeWill   Feb-15-08 08:36 PM   #22 
     - Not a problem. Maybe you should call her a secular humanist while you're at it.  Karmadillo   Feb-15-08 11:32 PM   #23 
  - Hillary Rosen is a sellout  gaiilonfong   Feb-15-08 07:43 PM   #20 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC