Reply #50: Well from where i sit, it doesn't seem very reasoned to...

[MagsDem]

insist your guy is the anti-war candidate when he voted against timetables for withdrawal from Iraq prior to deciding to run for POTUS. Doesn't seem reasonable to vote for a dem whose healthcare proposal only covers half the uninsured, but costs the govt almost as much as one that covers all the uninsured, and costs individuals 80% more than the one that covers all uninsured.

Doesn't seem reasoned to me to vote for a guy for POTUS who's highest office before this first senate term, which is only halfway complete, was a state senator. Doesn't seem reasoned to me to put a guy that has never run even a statewide campaign against an actual contender up against rethugs when we actually have a chance at winning with an experienced candidate. Doesn't make sense to me to support a guy that panders to rethugs, but can't win a single southern state in the GE.