rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 30. more and more--the biased coverage for Obama is coming out. The sheepies just lap it up. |
| -Washington Post: Obama benefits from biased "blowout coverage" |
bidenista |
Feb-04-08 09:20 AM |
#0 |
 -
Thanks for posting. This is quite an interesting article, although we've seen the |
Alamom |
Feb-04-08 09:25 AM |
#1 |
| -
Coverage like that is worth millions of dollars. |
avaistheone1 |
Feb-04-08 09:26 AM |
#2 |
  -
The next followup question would be WHY? |
Tellurian |
Feb-04-08 09:31 AM |
#3 |
| -
Caroline never knew her father?? Try telling HER that. What a shameless and nasty shill of a post. |
K Gardner |
Feb-04-08 09:32 AM |
#4 |
| -
Of course she never knew him. Are you daft? |
Tellurian |
Feb-04-08 09:50 AM |
#24 |
| -
She knew him as a child knows a father |
karynnj |
Feb-04-08 10:04 AM |
#54 |
| -
I believe you misread the second half of Tellurian's post. Why wld Caroline align herself w/ MSM.. |
elixir |
Feb-04-08 10:15 AM |
#59 |
| -
I read it right - I simply disagree that they |
karynnj |
Feb-04-08 11:14 AM |
#75 |
| -
Because Obama is the best candidate the Democrats have run in decades. |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 09:34 AM |
#5 |
| -
Far better than Gore, or Clark ...and the MSM just always LOVES good candidates.non? |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 09:40 AM |
#13 |
| -
I think so, yes. The question was why the Kennedys endorsed Obama, not |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 09:44 AM |
#19 |
| -
Same reason he endorsed Kerry + the power struggle in the party. The rest |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 09:51 AM |
#27 |
| -
Conspiratorial sour grapes. nt |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 09:54 AM |
#35 |
| -
We may or we may not see reality confirm that. I'd rather we don't |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 09:57 AM |
#43 |
| -
Or so you desperately hope. |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 09:58 AM |
#45 |
| -
The MSM backs the best and most recent story, nothing more. They have no moral compunction becuase |
elixir |
Feb-04-08 10:16 AM |
#62 |
| -
Well, then based on your negative reasoning, our best candidate ... |
krkaufman |
Feb-04-08 09:52 AM |
#32 |
| -
Obama is a media creation.. nothing more.. and comparing him to JFK is a denial of reality.... |
Tellurian |
Feb-04-08 09:59 AM |
#46 |
| -
No. Obama creates media coverage. It must seem bizarre to a supporter of someone |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 10:08 AM |
#57 |
| -
Hillary has a record to stand on...Obama stands on a resume of non-accomplishments and thin air! |
Tellurian |
Feb-04-08 12:06 PM |
#78 |
| -
“blind, love struck Caroline” |
LowerManhattanite |
Feb-04-08 09:45 AM |
#21 |
| -
If Caroline can equate Obama to her father...then she's off her rocker! |
Tellurian |
Feb-04-08 09:51 AM |
#28 |
| -
I think she knows both better than you do. |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 09:54 AM |
#37 |
| -
And now, she's “mentally ill”... |
LowerManhattanite |
Feb-04-08 09:58 AM |
#44 |
| -
I'm just glad I have whoever this putz is on ignore. nt |
thecatburgler |
Feb-04-08 10:04 AM |
#51 |
| -
Caroline explained, at her endorsement of Obama.. |
Tellurian |
Feb-04-08 10:04 AM |
#53 |
| -
Do you know Obama better than she does? |
karynnj |
Feb-04-08 10:13 AM |
#58 |
| -
Agreed. That's just like equating Humpin' Henry Hyde's marriage |
desi |
Feb-04-08 10:35 AM |
#70 |
| -
So are you saying Obama has worked the MSM better than Hillary? And... |
sfam |
Feb-04-08 09:36 AM |
#6 |
| -
no, i'm not saying that. read the article |
bidenista |
Feb-04-08 09:38 AM |
#8 |
| -
Obama didn't "work" the MSM - MSM is working the voters - manipulating our |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 09:42 AM |
#16 |
| -
more and more--the biased coverage for Obama is coming out. The sheepies just lap it up. |
rodeodance |
Feb-04-08 09:52 AM |
#30 |
| -
"he gave them the keys to Camelot." HA HA--guess Fairy Tales are full swing in the |
rodeodance |
Feb-04-08 09:50 AM |
#26 |
| -
I always wondered where Teddy kept those keys and why did he never use them |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 09:52 AM |
#31 |
| -
What exactly do you think Kennedy said in his endorsement? Deal with it. |
sfam |
Feb-04-08 09:53 AM |
#33 |
| -
he gave him the fairy tale that never was. |
rodeodance |
Feb-04-08 01:12 PM |
#79 |
| -
K&R! |
William769 |
Feb-04-08 09:38 AM |
#7 |
| -
here's another good observation: |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 09:38 AM |
#9 |
| -
Two notes. |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 09:43 AM |
#17 |
| -
The MSM is setting... |
AX10 |
Feb-04-08 07:52 PM |
#86 |
| -
Huh. So Obama is much better at controlling the media narrative than Hillary. |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 09:38 AM |
#10 |
| -
He never had to control it |
leftynyc |
Feb-04-08 09:54 AM |
#38 |
| -
He does make it seem effortless. Hallmark of a talented politician. Hillary is hamfisted |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 09:55 AM |
#41 |
| -
No talent involved by Obama when msm does the kid glove approach when |
rodeodance |
Feb-04-08 10:02 AM |
#50 |
| -
Nothing happens by happenstance in politics. Obama's playing them like a piano. |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 10:04 AM |
#52 |
| -
I hope I'll miss the part where the piano eats the pianist. I trully do! |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 11:02 AM |
#74 |
| -
The reason is that the nation has been waiting for a new JFK since JFK was killed |
Dems Will Win |
Feb-04-08 09:39 AM |
#11 |
| -
Hillary had a stranglehold of the media for months |
NJSecularist |
Feb-04-08 09:40 AM |
#12 |
| -
Hillary never got favorable coverage - Obama love=Hillary hate (that never changed) |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 09:44 AM |
#18 |
| -
Col. Kurtz on DU: Just when I think I've seen it all. |
chascarrillo |
Feb-04-08 09:40 AM |
#14 |
| -
You mean, as opposed to every other media whore quoted in support of Obama |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 09:45 AM |
#20 |
| -
No. In conjunction with. |
chascarrillo |
Feb-04-08 09:48 AM |
#23 |
| -
How Rovian of you--kill the messenger. |
rodeodance |
Feb-04-08 09:54 AM |
#36 |
| -
It's somehow "Rovian" of me to ridicule a right-wing media pundit? |
chascarrillo |
Feb-04-08 07:46 PM |
#85 |
| -
It is expected that the Democratic Party establishment will support Hillary Clinton |
Apollo11 |
Feb-04-08 09:41 AM |
#15 |
| -
Hog wash! Kennedy's are establishment. They along with MSM |
Little Star |
Feb-04-08 09:50 AM |
#25 |
| -
I was just saying why Kennedys endorsing Obama gets media coverage. |
Apollo11 |
Feb-04-08 09:56 AM |
#42 |
| -
Suggesting a different frame for this... |
Duke Newcombe |
Feb-04-08 09:48 AM |
#22 |
| -
Kurtz... |
LowerManhattanite |
Feb-04-08 09:51 AM |
#29 |
| -
That's an ad-hominem attack |
Summerza |
Feb-04-08 06:43 PM |
#84 |
| -
It was a big deal because it was assumed that the Kennedy's would endorse Clinton. The story wasn't |
RoadRage |
Feb-04-08 09:54 AM |
#34 |
| -
Exactly!!! n/t |
sfam |
Feb-04-08 09:55 AM |
#40 |
| -
Assumed by whom? kerry already endorsed Obama - and we knew the rivalry |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 09:59 AM |
#47 |
| -
What rivalry? By all accounts they are very close. Talk about revisionism! Forget the MSM, |
sfam |
Feb-04-08 10:01 AM |
#49 |
| -
DU has been abuzz with speculations - "Clinton didn't help Kerry in 2004 because |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 10:16 AM |
#60 |
| -
We are talking about Kennedy and Clinton, not Kerry and Clinton n/t |
sfam |
Feb-04-08 10:18 AM |
#65 |
| -
Same thing. 2 spheres of influence. Soldiers of the main actors are mere surrogates |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 10:58 AM |
#72 |
| -
Kennedy and Clinton are fairly close friends. You're simply making up "facts." |
Occam Bandage |
Feb-04-08 10:05 AM |
#55 |
| -
By "We" you must mean you & a friend? Because I certainly knew of NO |
RoadRage |
Feb-04-08 10:16 AM |
#63 |
| -
Find me a kerry supporter from 2004 supporting Hillary (even temporarily, before |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 10:20 AM |
#68 |
| -
My post doesn't discuss Kerry at all - only Kennedy. NT |
RoadRage |
Feb-04-08 11:35 AM |
#77 |
| -
Although there were clues that he was not enthusiastic about HRC even before 2007 |
karynnj |
Feb-04-08 10:20 AM |
#67 |
| -
Thank you for the honest contribution. The signs were there for anyone paying attention |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 11:00 AM |
#73 |
| -
Face it, the corporate Media get to chose the POTUS-voters are a mear formailty |
adapa |
Feb-04-08 09:54 AM |
#39 |
| -
Every. Single. Time. Eliminated progressive candidates, and now try toget rid of |
robbedvoter |
Feb-04-08 10:18 AM |
#66 |
| -
It is a double edged sword. [see NH] nt |
mckeown1128 |
Feb-04-08 10:01 AM |
#48 |
| -
Interesting analysis - I'm feeling more and more what John hinted at last week |
Politicub |
Feb-04-08 10:06 AM |
#56 |
| -
Hell, even the CNN poll which shows the race tightening |
bigtree |
Feb-04-08 10:16 AM |
#61 |
| -
So, suddenly Kurts is the Media Oracle |
NoBorders |
Feb-04-08 10:17 AM |
#64 |
| -
I have a dream -of a PR machine. Like political photoshop |
guruoo |
Feb-04-08 10:26 AM |
#69 |
| -
looks like a good meal there. nt |
bidenista |
Feb-04-08 10:39 AM |
#71 |
| -
Here's the pre PR machine image: |
guruoo |
Feb-04-08 11:29 AM |
#76 |
| -
Very interesting. |
avrdream |
Feb-04-08 06:22 PM |
#80 |
| -
Howard Kurtz has talent |
Summerza |
Feb-04-08 06:23 PM |
#81 |
| -
the media is about as phoney as the voting computers in Ohio |
cd3dem |
Feb-04-08 06:25 PM |
#82 |
| -
So where was this moaning about "blowout coverage" back before NH? |
high density |
Feb-04-08 06:30 PM |
#83 |
| -
Nice to see that I'm not the only one noticing the BS Obama coverage. n/t |
Stand and Fight |
Feb-05-08 03:03 AM |
#87 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread