You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: Welcome to DU, OneSelf! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Welcome to DU, OneSelf!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Clinton was my third choice because she was female which means special electability issues. Proud2BAmurkin  Feb-02-08 10:01 PM   #0 
  - You're a fucking machine, aren't ya?  MonkeyFunk   Feb-02-08 10:01 PM   #1 
  - Here Here!!  neutron   Feb-02-08 10:26 PM   #23 
  - Hi!  OneSelf   Feb-02-08 10:02 PM   #2 
  - Welcome to DU, OneSelf!  gateley   Feb-02-08 10:06 PM   #8 
  - "McGovernite"? You do know that McGovern endorsed Hillary, don't you?  ocelot   Feb-02-08 10:02 PM   #3 
  - I like McGovern except as a candidate type.  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 10:03 PM   #4 
     - "Candidate type." What does that mean?  ocelot   Feb-02-08 10:05 PM   #6 
        - "anti war" presidential candidates. They lose.  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 10:06 PM   #9 
           - Got it. So I should vote for your waffling, IWR, Kyle-Lieberman voting candidate instead  ocelot   Feb-02-08 10:13 PM   #14 
           - vote for the one who didn't waffle but said the same thing Kerry and Edwards said  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 10:27 PM   #24 
              - Edwards apologized for his IWR vote. Obama was against the war. Hill still won't admit she was wrong  ocelot   Feb-02-08 10:29 PM   #28 
           - Are pro-war proponents "candidate types"?  BushDespiser12   Feb-02-08 10:14 PM   #16 
              - in presidential elections it's "anti war" and "patriotic"  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 10:25 PM   #20 
                 - what is?  BushDespiser12   Feb-02-08 10:30 PM   #29 
                    - the way it's played in the MSM and ALSO in voter minds. was ever thus  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 10:53 PM   #36 
  - Got it. You're voting for Hillary because she's a woman. What a great reason.  Alexander   Feb-02-08 10:05 PM   #5 
  - more like in spite of it (electability issues men don't have) but thanks for playing  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 10:06 PM   #7 
  - No point in discussing things with you.  Alexander   Feb-02-08 10:08 PM   #12 
  - Alex-if it's not race or gender, what is it. That's all he has going  bellasgrams   Feb-02-08 10:32 PM   #30 
     - "I will come back and bite us in the GE."  BushDespiser12   Feb-02-08 10:34 PM   #31 
  - Oh look, a cute kitty  Kittycat   Feb-02-08 10:07 PM   #10 
  - I hate to say it but....  mckeown1128   Feb-02-08 10:21 PM   #18 
  - Anyone who doesn't grasp that they are BOTH electable  cali   Feb-02-08 10:08 PM   #11 
  - I disagree that she's the most electable.  quantessd   Feb-02-08 10:09 PM   #13 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-02-08 10:14 PM   #15 
  - lol  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 10:15 PM   #17 
  - The fate of your funny little buddy  BushDespiser12   Feb-02-08 11:45 PM   #41 
  - WTF?  BushDespiser12   Feb-02-08 10:23 PM   #19 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-02-08 10:26 PM   #21 
        - !  orleans   Feb-02-08 10:28 PM   #26 
  - "Clinton was my third choice because she was female which means special electability issues"  Tweed   Feb-02-08 10:26 PM   #22 
  - you should be able to follow along.  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 10:27 PM   #25 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-02-08 10:28 PM   #27 
  - Wow. So you're a sexist too. Nice.  Withywindle   Feb-02-08 10:34 PM   #32 
  - For them? or as one of them? n/t  5X   Feb-02-08 10:43 PM   #34 
  - Hard to tell the difference, isn't it?  Withywindle   Feb-02-08 10:55 PM   #37 
  - Do you think someone should vote for a candidate they think will lose  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 10:51 PM   #35 
     - I think people should vote for the candidate they think best represents their concerns.  Withywindle   Feb-02-08 11:12 PM   #40 
  - I was awhile coming around to her as well.  Jim4Wes   Feb-02-08 10:38 PM   #33 
  - Who were your other two candidates?  NJSecularist   Feb-02-08 11:00 PM   #38 
     - Edwards until I determined he didn't spend enough time on national security, then Obama  Proud2BAmurkin   Feb-02-08 11:02 PM   #39 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC