Evergreen Emerald
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. I will tell you what: Read her speech, dissect it like you do Obama's |
|
giving her the benefit of the doubt and the most positive interpretation, and then get back to me.
|
| -Hillary's Sincerity Problem ---> |
Stephanie |
Feb-02-08 02:58 PM |
#0 |
-
I disagree with you. I believe her when she talked about the vote |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 03:00 PM |
#1 |
 -
absolutly..we need a leader who stands behind what they say. |
KennedyGuy |
Feb-02-08 03:03 PM |
#3 |
  -
Obama is a nothing candidate, He can only run on attacks |
neutron |
Feb-02-08 03:57 PM |
#22 |
  -
AUTHORIZATION TO USE MILITARY FORCE |
fenriswolf |
Feb-02-08 04:02 PM |
#24 |
 -
Depends on what he meant by 'military force'? |
polpilot |
Feb-05-08 07:33 AM |
#60 |
 -
OK...... |
sparosnare |
Feb-02-08 03:03 PM |
#4 |
  -
well, if you are concerned with a pattern of lying |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 03:05 PM |
#5 |
   -
Thanks for avoiding my question. |
sparosnare |
Feb-02-08 03:06 PM |
#7 |
  -
typical? Of who? Of what? Of not answering obvious questions? |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 03:09 PM |
#10 |
  -
megalomaniac ..its a big word..ask for help |
KennedyGuy |
Feb-02-08 03:46 PM |
#13 |
 -
Megalomaniac = Her Majesty Hillary |
ErnestoG |
Feb-02-08 04:36 PM |
#43 |
 -
Most Democrats In Congress Voted Against The War |
MannyGoldstein |
Feb-02-08 04:13 PM |
#31 |
  -
Exactly. This was a moral test and she failed. |
Stephanie |
Feb-03-08 04:53 PM |
#47 |
 -
I agree that Hillary is a truth teller while Obama seems to have a problem with "details" - but DU |
papau |
Feb-02-08 04:19 PM |
#37 |
 -
Obama's sincerity problem |
niceypoo |
Feb-05-08 07:32 AM |
#59 |
-
I always thought so. Lately I've seen other good reasons. |
aquart |
Feb-02-08 03:02 PM |
#2 |
 -
Barack Obama's 2002 Speech Against the Iraq War |
Stephanie |
Feb-02-08 03:05 PM |
#6 |
-
Thanks Stephanie! |
livetohike |
Feb-02-08 03:07 PM |
#8 |
-
well, you have to include all of his statements...and don't forget his actions |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 03:08 PM |
#9 |
 -
"stated that he is with Bush and agrees with him about the war" |
Stephanie |
Feb-02-08 03:22 PM |
#11 |
  -
here you go...apology accepted. |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 03:45 PM |
#12 |
 -
That was with how the war was being ran, funded, logistically, etc. |
Levgreee |
Feb-02-08 03:47 PM |
#14 |
 -
What? I see, so you are willing to dissect a statement from Obama |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 03:51 PM |
#17 |
 -
What the hell do you mean "on paper" means? Your interpretation is absurd |
Levgreee |
Feb-02-08 03:57 PM |
#21 |
 -
Also, you have no proof for this statement "--took the speech off his website when he thought it... |
Levgreee |
Feb-02-08 03:49 PM |
#16 |
  -
riggghhht...see there you go again. Giving him the most positive |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 03:52 PM |
#19 |
 -
When have I misinterpreted Clinton's statement as saying something she did not mean? |
Levgreee |
Feb-02-08 03:58 PM |
#23 |
 -
I will tell you what: Read her speech, dissect it like you do Obama's |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 04:02 PM |
#25 |
 -
I think Hillary had a reasonable, intelligent position on the war, her speech shows this |
Levgreee |
Feb-02-08 04:07 PM |
#29 |
 -
Here's my comparison of the Two speeches |
maddiejoan |
Feb-02-08 04:17 PM |
#33 |
 -
That is great! |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 04:19 PM |
#35 |
 -
If you read Obama's speech |
maddiejoan |
Feb-02-08 04:24 PM |
#38 |
 -
Are you serious? |
Stephanie |
Feb-03-08 05:55 PM |
#48 |
 -
--agreed that he did not know how he would have voted as he was not there-- that comment was made |
Levgreee |
Feb-02-08 03:52 PM |
#18 |
  -
When it mattered. When he could actually DO something more than give |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 03:54 PM |
#20 |
 -
You don't understand his position on the war... read this |
Levgreee |
Feb-02-08 04:04 PM |
#27 |
 -
No. I understand perfectly. I just am offended at his political lies as he |
Evergreen Emerald |
Feb-02-08 04:06 PM |
#28 |
 -
He marched with us in 2003 before the war |
Donna Zen |
Feb-03-08 11:03 PM |
#51 |
-
So happy to see you, Donna! |
Stephanie |
Feb-04-08 07:18 PM |
#55 |
-
Thanks for the thread link |
Donna Zen |
Feb-04-08 09:03 PM |
#56 |
-
We have to meet up. |
Stephanie |
Feb-04-08 09:12 PM |
#57 |
-
Compare the speeches. |
maddiejoan |
Feb-02-08 04:16 PM |
#32 |
-
Which he removed from his website |
never_get_over_it |
Feb-02-08 04:26 PM |
#39 |
-
You do know that he wants to go back into Afghanistan and into Pakistan - right?????? |
pirhana |
Feb-02-08 04:27 PM |
#40 |
-
HA!! Tom Tomorrow ALWAYS nails it! |
ErnestoG |
Feb-02-08 03:48 PM |
#15 |
-
Clinton has a projection problem. We'll never know who she is |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-02-08 04:04 PM |
#26 |
 -
Because she doesn't want you to know. |
Stephanie |
Feb-03-08 02:20 AM |
#45 |
-
She's so busy reframing that she doesn't notice that even the front row |
sfexpat2000 |
Feb-05-08 07:36 AM |
#61 |
-
The cartoon paints a clear picture. |
Radical Activist |
Feb-02-08 04:10 PM |
#30 |
 -
And the clarity of it makes me wonder why we even have as many Clinton |
BullGooseLoony |
Feb-02-08 04:35 PM |
#42 |
-
Many of them are recent arrivals. |
Stephanie |
Feb-03-08 11:19 AM |
#46 |
-
Yup. |
Xap |
Feb-02-08 04:18 PM |
#34 |
 -
'Nuff said. |
Stephanie |
Feb-04-08 03:37 PM |
#54 |
-
its not a problem--just a little giblet in your imagination. |
rodeodance |
Feb-02-08 04:19 PM |
#36 |
 -
A giblet? |
Stephanie |
Feb-05-08 07:27 AM |
#58 |
-
Nominating Clinton does not get summed up much better than that. nt |
BullGooseLoony |
Feb-02-08 04:33 PM |
#41 |
 -
Thanks. |
Stephanie |
Feb-03-08 01:31 AM |
#44 |
-
Tom Tomorrow always nails it. |
NC_Nurse |
Feb-03-08 06:11 PM |
#49 |
 -
He does indeed. |
Stephanie |
Feb-03-08 10:19 PM |
#50 |
-
k/r.... Tom Tomorrow always gets it right.... |
scheming daemons |
Feb-03-08 11:07 PM |
#52 |
-
thanks |
Stephanie |
Feb-04-08 12:32 PM |
#53 |