You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #60: How does HRC? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
60. How does HRC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -A reminder to Clinton supporters about an issue they wish would just go away ErnestoG  Feb-01-08 05:52 PM   #0 
  - OBAMA DIDN'T VOTE AGAINST THE IWR.  jlake   Feb-01-08 05:53 PM   #1 
  - Was he in Congress then in order to do it? NO.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 05:53 PM   #2 
  - No, But I am getting tired of people saying he didn't vote for it..... and not accepting  jlake   Feb-01-08 05:54 PM   #3 
     - Then please cut out the disingenuous tripe.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 05:56 PM   #7 
        - disingenuous tripe is claiming Obama has been against the war from the beginning,  jlake   Feb-01-08 05:58 PM   #13 
           - Hillary enabled Bush's war. Obama didn't. Facts are facts.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:02 PM   #24 
           - The blame is being put squarely where it belongs...  ingac70   Feb-01-08 06:03 PM   #28 
              - Yes, but that is not the ONLY position Obama took - you are cherrypicking.  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:05 PM   #30 
              - Cherrypicking? Like refusing to hold your candidate's feet to the fire?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:06 PM   #33 
                 - I am not refusing to hold Hillary accountable -- I just see through Obama's schtick  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:07 PM   #38 
                    - Sure you are. And not doing a particularly good job of it.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:08 PM   #42 
                    - Oh dear.  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:10 PM   #47 
                    - IP is one of this BLIND-FAITH FOLLOWERS---impossible to use reason with them  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:10 PM   #48 
                       - It's really sad. But I guess true...  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:11 PM   #53 
                       - Sure looks like facts put the Hillary supporter into a quick sprint in the other direction...  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:12 PM   #54 
                          - boo--fact is--I tire of your silly conjurations. bye  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:23 PM   #85 
                             - Good luck helping Hillary hide her war vote from McCain's strategists.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:25 PM   #88 
                                - I trust that she will do just fine.  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 07:12 PM   #93 
              - GET THIS: bush is respon for this war-GOT IT!!????  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:08 PM   #41 
                 - And he had help - like Hillary's vote. GOT THAT?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:09 PM   #43 
                 - Blind-faith is dangerous.  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:11 PM   #51 
                 - That's what I've been telling Hillary supporters.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:11 PM   #52 
                 - You are the one with blind faith..  ingac70   Feb-01-08 06:13 PM   #57 
                 - Thanks for your continuing to enlighten some  truedelphi   Feb-01-08 06:15 PM   #63 
                 - She is very Bushian in that way. Can't cop to their own culpas.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:15 PM   #65 
                    - Or Rovian, which is even worse.  HughBeaumont   Feb-01-08 07:21 PM   #98 
                 - Plus a whole lot of other senators  Irishonly   Feb-01-08 07:27 PM   #102 
                 - As are all who voted to let him go to war..  ingac70   Feb-01-08 06:10 PM   #49 
                    - Well that is why for me the issue is not "Would I vote for a woman  truedelphi   Feb-01-08 06:19 PM   #75 
                       - Exactly. It wasnt like Hillary would have been out on a rock by herself on that  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:20 PM   #77 
  - Since he wasn't in the senate at the time, that's pretty much a foregone conclusion, isn't it?  EmperorHasNoClothes   Feb-01-08 05:55 PM   #5 
     - These people need a new dodge.....  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 05:56 PM   #8 
     - Yeah, one would think. But unfortunately there are many who have been lead to believe  jlake   Feb-01-08 05:57 PM   #11 
        - Who?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:02 PM   # 
           - Obamabots have lead many people to believe that is the case.  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:03 PM   #25 
              - WHO? Name them and give examples.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:06 PM   #32 
                 - This thread. Post 3 doesn't seem to know he wasn't in the senate.  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:09 PM   #44 
                    - Doesn't "seem" to know?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:11 PM   #50 
                       - Okay - they flat out say it.  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:13 PM   # 
                          - Example?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:13 PM   #59 
                             - The same link I gave you:  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:15 PM   #64 
                                - You said that one "seemed" to say so. Thats not the same as "said it"  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:16 PM   #66 
                                   - If you read the post they say it *Flat Out*  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:17 PM   #71 
                                      - "They"? It was one poster wasnt it?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:18 PM   #74 
                                         - Um Yeah, it was the example you asked for.... an obamabot who thinks Obama  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:20 PM   #78 
                                            - No, you said THEY. Plural. You showed me one. Are you trying to make a case using one person?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:21 PM   #81 
                                               - Please look through the archives.  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:23 PM   #86 
                                                  - Obama lies? Oh I'm sure you have as much proof for that as you do the other...  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:24 PM   #87 
                                                     - I already proved my point and you tried to raise the bar.  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:25 PM   #89 
                                                     - What point? You're all over the map!  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:33 PM   #91 
  - Q: What does the GOP & Hillary have in common?  DJ13   Feb-01-08 05:55 PM   #4 
  - Bingo!  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 05:55 PM   #6 
  - I seem to remember winning that discussion, actually.  joshcryer   Feb-01-08 05:56 PM   #9 
  - In your mind, I'm sure that was the case.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 05:59 PM   #15 
     - On planet reality you didn't respond to my facts?  joshcryer   Feb-01-08 06:04 PM   #29 
        - When you produce any facts, we'll address that  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:07 PM   #35 
           - You read my reply to you in the other thread.  joshcryer   Feb-01-08 06:08 PM   #40 
              - I read a string of nonsense with your name on it, if thats what you meant  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:10 PM   #45 
                 - Oh lordy, you clearly don't even want to have a discussion here.  joshcryer   Feb-01-08 06:13 PM   #55 
                    - No, he didnt. Thats why they had the IWR. And you still dont get it wasnt a declared war.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:14 PM   #62 
  - They would have died anyways with or without Hillary.  AGirl   Feb-01-08 05:57 PM   #10 
  - Hillary did her part to enable it...and now runs from it.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 05:58 PM   #12 
  - the point is, she didn't cause those deaths..  AGirl   Feb-01-08 05:59 PM   #14 
  - She enabled them. Obama didnt. Those are facts.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:00 PM   #20 
     - No, it is you who are questioning her very reasoned decision--demeaning.  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:16 PM   #68 
        - Very reasoned decision? She didnt even bother to read the NIE!  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:17 PM   #70 
  - Obama used the excuse "my vote wouldn't have mattered" when he skipped  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:00 PM   #17 
  - He didn't vote for it. therefore you have no case.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:01 PM   #21 
     - He sure as fuck didn't vote against it.  jlake   Feb-01-08 06:02 PM   #22 
     - He wasnt in Congress then. How many times are you gonna try that canard?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:07 PM   #37 
        - It's not a canard, it's a fact.  1corona4u   Feb-01-08 07:23 PM   #100 
     - he is full of excuses--that iis his MO--but blind faith gets in the way doesn't it.  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:17 PM   #72 
        - Yes, you read the Hillary supporter very well.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:19 PM   #76 
  - She is not running. It was Obama who was SCARED of the lady in Red the other evening  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:14 PM   #61 
     - She goes into a mumbling fit whenever it comes up. The GOIP is gonna cream her with that  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:17 PM   #69 
  - Her vote counted. n/t  MrWiggles   Feb-01-08 06:00 PM   #18 
  - Only one way to stop it, stop the funding. How does your guy  Little Star   Feb-01-08 05:59 PM   #16 
  - Only idiots want to leave the soldiers without food.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:00 PM   #19 
  - Soldiers have plenty of food, it's just not in Iraq. Their food is back home, where they would go...  joshcryer   Feb-01-08 06:13 PM   #58 
  - You mean because of people like Hillary putting them in Iraq? oh good argument LOL  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:18 PM   #73 
  - What an idiot thing to say. NO withdrawal plans leaves soldiers without food. But you knew  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:22 PM   #83 
     - you're confusing withdrawal plans and a vote to put them there in the first place  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:23 PM   #84 
  - How does HRC?  MercutioATC   Feb-01-08 06:14 PM   #60 
  - No. Just no.  Sybbis   Feb-01-08 06:02 PM   #23 
  - She has to own her part in it. And she won't. Is that presidential, to you?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:03 PM   #26 
     - Of course it's presidential...  Sybbis   Feb-01-08 06:32 PM   # 
        - Are you familiar with the terms "aiding and abetting", or "accessory to a crime"?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:35 PM   #92 
  - "Barack was against the war before he had to take a stand." Odd camopaign slogan  Yossariant   Feb-01-08 06:03 PM   #27 
  - That really makes zero sense. How can you vote on a bill if you arent yet in Congress?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:05 PM   #31 
     - That's what I said.  Yossariant   Feb-01-08 06:06 PM   #34 
  - ANOTHR SHE DID NOT SAY SORRY THREAD!! GET USED TO IT!!  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:07 PM   #36 
  - do you want someone so irresponsible with a war vote to be president?  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:08 PM   #39 
     - I do not see her in that way. so i am quite satisfied thank you.  rodeodance   Feb-01-08 06:20 PM   #79 
        - You can see her riding a yak, but that doesnt make it so. Talk about blind faith!  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:22 PM   #82 
  - No worries. It will not be forgotten.  AtomicKitten   Feb-01-08 06:10 PM   #46 
  - Thank you.  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:13 PM   #56 
  - How is this relevant now?  nonconformist   Feb-01-08 06:16 PM   #67 
  - It's relevent because she won't own her mistake. She is in massive denial  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:21 PM   #80 
     - She's going to withdraw troops once she gets in  goodgd_yall   Feb-01-08 07:14 PM   #94 
  - Update -  ErnestoG   Feb-01-08 06:32 PM   #90 
  - A million dead Iraqies  Harkpark   Feb-01-08 07:15 PM   #95 
  - Obamites like to look to the future--except when there's a chance to get a shot at Hillary.  Perry Logan   Feb-01-08 07:16 PM   #96 
  - Haha  Harkpark   Feb-01-08 07:42 PM   #104 
  - She was lied to  ecdab   Feb-01-08 07:43 PM   #105 
  - Here's another issue they remain deathly silent on . . .  HughBeaumont   Feb-01-08 07:18 PM   #97 
  - This is really over the line....  1corona4u   Feb-01-08 07:21 PM   #99 
  - Sorry I'M SICK OF MEN RUNNING THIS COUNTY! I can't vote for Obama  demo dutch   Feb-01-08 07:27 PM   #101 
  - She didn't start the war. Bush did. n/t  Lil Missy   Feb-01-08 07:41 PM   #103 
  - The occupation that the other candidate supported with his votes in the Senate  bigtree   Feb-01-08 07:45 PM   #106 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC