You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Exactly. He is ineligible only by election, not by succession. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Exactly. He is ineligible only by election, not by succession.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -It's not gonna happen, but it's cool that Bill Clinton COULD be VP TN4Gore  Mar-03-04 09:15 AM   #0 
  - Nope - not by election - Consitution forbids.  papau   Mar-03-04 09:18 AM   #1 
  - where does it say that in the constitution?  TN4Gore   Mar-03-04 09:19 AM   #2 
     - Forget it, TN4Gore...  RememberTheCoup   Mar-03-04 09:26 AM   #8 
     - Not quite  Warpy   Mar-03-04 09:38 AM   #12 
     - The Vice Dean of Law at Columbia University disagrees with you.  RememberTheCoup   Mar-03-04 09:41 AM   #13 
     - Boy was I wrong! - post number 11 says it all - Clinton for VP!!!!!  papau   Mar-03-04 09:53 AM   #15 
  - 12th Amendment - Last Line  SaveElmer   Mar-03-04 09:23 AM   #3 
  - He ISN'T constitutionally ineligible to the office  TN4Gore   Mar-03-04 09:24 AM   #5 
     - You're wrong.  bowens43   Mar-03-04 09:26 AM   #7 
  - No , he COULDN'T be  bowens43   Mar-03-04 09:24 AM   #4 
  - see above -- it's a loophole that should probably be fixed  TN4Gore   Mar-03-04 09:25 AM   #6 
     - There's no loop hole.  bowens43   Mar-03-04 09:26 AM   #9 
        - have you READ the 22nd amendment?  TN4Gore   Mar-03-04 09:28 AM   #10 
           - Exactly. He is ineligible only by election, not by succession.  Mary Pat   Mar-03-04 10:11 AM   #17 
  - Read this.  RememberTheCoup   Mar-03-04 09:34 AM   #11 
  - The Poli Scientist in me doesn't buy that...  mb7588a   Mar-03-04 03:01 PM   #26 
  - bizzare  prodigal_green   Mar-03-04 09:42 AM   #14 
  - One more.  RememberTheCoup   Mar-03-04 09:53 AM   #16 
  - The Constitution Is Clear, But So Is The Loophole...  The_Counsel   Mar-03-04 10:26 AM   #18 
  - I've seen at least one other thread...  RememberTheCoup   Mar-03-04 11:38 AM   #19 
  - Coup...  The_Counsel   Mar-03-04 12:25 PM   #21 
     - Ha ha! Okay, then I'll go easy on you.  RememberTheCoup   Mar-03-04 01:31 PM   #22 
        - Republicans and the Constitution  The_Counsel   Mar-03-04 02:33 PM   #25 
  - LOL!  Robb   Mar-03-04 11:59 AM   #20 
  - Kerry/Clinton 2004! Clinton/Clinton 2008! nt  tobius   Mar-03-04 01:41 PM   #23 
  - and as was so often said on the Johnny Carson show...  NewYorkerfromMass   Mar-03-04 02:00 PM   #24 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC