You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #32: Or rather, we think it's stupid to flyspeck votes and remove context from parliamentary procedures. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. Or rather, we think it's stupid to flyspeck votes and remove context from parliamentary procedures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Edwards got only 10% of the vote of folks looking for change jackson_dem  Jan-26-08 07:17 PM   #0 
  - Edwards  Parche   Jan-26-08 07:18 PM   #1 
  - not he's not out yet.  alyce douglas   Jan-26-08 07:19 PM   #3 
  - That is because he won the vote of folks looking for a caring candidate  jackson_dem   Jan-26-08 07:20 PM   #5 
  - Not many at all.  mycritters2   Jan-26-08 07:18 PM   #2 
  - Media creates perceptions. I still don't know what Clinton said that racial bait  robbedvoter   Jan-26-08 07:20 PM   #4 
  - It's crazy ... a total disconnect.  LiberalHeart   Jan-26-08 07:21 PM   #6 
  - Yes  Indenturedebtor   Jan-26-08 07:28 PM   #7 
  - Most voters are stupid. Fuck them. THEY should STFu when they get raped by what THEY voted for  jackson_dem   Jan-27-08 01:09 AM   #8 
  - See, now "fuck America" is not a mindset that leads to success.  Occam Bandage   Jan-27-08 01:55 AM   #14 
  - He'll have win the GE first. Doubt that will happen. The jobs will be sent  Blue State Native   Jan-27-08 06:08 AM   #31 
  - For some reason this reminds me of Gulf War 1....  avaistheone1   Jan-27-08 01:16 AM   #9 
  - The people of South Carolina actually know John Edwards  2rth2pwr   Jan-27-08 01:42 AM   #10 
  - Yeah right  jackson_dem   Jan-27-08 01:53 AM   #11 
     - They voted for him in 2004. Did they not learn then?  Occam Bandage   Jan-27-08 01:55 AM   #13 
     - Bingo! His record didn't change in 4 years, his song and dance did.  2rth2pwr   Jan-27-08 02:05 AM   #15 
        - Which is the important thing in a campaign. Politicians cast thousands of votes;  Occam Bandage   Jan-27-08 02:12 AM   #18 
        - If anything he should have improved if we accept the Big Lie about him  jackson_dem   Jan-27-08 04:18 AM   #22 
           - or maybe they liked him as he was  Egnever   Jan-27-08 04:37 AM   #25 
              - He won the white vote in SC in 2004. He won the white vote in SC in 2008  jackson_dem   Jan-27-08 04:40 AM   #26 
                 - whats your point?  Egnever   Jan-27-08 04:57 AM   #27 
                    - The point is his record is not why he fared poorly tonight  jackson_dem   Jan-27-08 04:58 AM   #28 
                       - really why did he do poorly ?  Egnever   Jan-27-08 05:47 AM   #29 
                          - The media blackout  jackson_dem   Jan-27-08 06:01 AM   #30 
  - I think when voters say they want "change," they don't mean "a candidate who will  Occam Bandage   Jan-27-08 01:54 AM   #12 
     - Best advice then...is don't vote Obama.  avaistheone1   Jan-27-08 02:09 AM   #16 
     - Of the three, he's been the most consistent in his positions.  Occam Bandage   Jan-27-08 02:10 AM   #17 
        - When the going get tough Obama caves.  avaistheone1   Jan-27-08 02:16 AM   #19 
           - If you're referring to "present" votes, take it up with Planned Parenthood. Their strategy.  Occam Bandage   Jan-27-08 02:18 AM   #20 
              - I'm not talking just about the Planned Parenthood votes.  avaistheone1   Jan-27-08 02:43 AM   #21 
                 - Obamites either know nothing about his record, block out negative info, or lie  jackson_dem   Jan-27-08 04:19 AM   #24 
                    - Or rather, we think it's stupid to flyspeck votes and remove context from parliamentary procedures.  Occam Bandage   Jan-27-08 09:53 AM   #32 
     - ding ding ding  Radical Activist   Jan-27-08 04:19 AM   #23 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC