robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 06:26 AM
Response to Original message |
| 23. And Zogby shows the difference going down again - only 7 this time |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 06:26 AM by robbedvoter
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph... me thinks after the egg on their faces in NH - they take no chances.
|
| -My predictions for SC and beyond : SC race is wide open, the rest is clearer |
robbedvoter |
Jan-24-08 05:36 AM |
#0 |
 -
Want to hear something truly bizarre? Edwards leads Obama amongst Republicans in SC |
jpgray |
Jan-24-08 05:38 AM |
#1 |
 -
Well, you might go with the obvious: |
cali |
Jan-24-08 05:44 AM |
#2 |
 -
Yet Obama leads amongst conservatives, so it is likely more complex than that |
jpgray |
Jan-24-08 05:46 AM |
#4 |
| -
The polling has been all over the place for the past few days |
wlucinda |
Jan-24-08 03:33 PM |
#21 |
| -
I think I know, but I wish I didn't |
tkmorris |
Jan-24-08 05:46 AM |
#5 |
| -
That's a possible factor. But from the same poll Obama leads amongst conservatives |
jpgray |
Jan-24-08 05:49 AM |
#6 |
| -
But we're talking about GOP-ers voting in Dem primaries - not for a winner |
robbedvoter |
Jan-24-08 05:55 AM |
#13 |
| -
I am not too surprised. In 2004, 70% of Edwards voters were Bush supporters |
robbedvoter |
Jan-24-08 05:49 AM |
#7 |
| -
That could also be the case. He's also been the victim of fewer widely-known attacks |
jpgray |
Jan-24-08 05:50 AM |
#9 |
| -
Edwards is known in SC - or at least the 2004 Edwards is |
robbedvoter |
Jan-24-08 05:53 AM |
#11 |
| -
I doubt they know about his mandatory health care plan, for example |
jpgray |
Jan-24-08 05:57 AM |
#14 |
| -
nm, not even worth it. n/t |
JTFrog |
Jan-24-08 05:45 AM |
#3 |
| -
4. if Obama loses - |
Maribelle |
Jan-24-08 05:50 AM |
#8 |
| -
I covered that with "weird message on his website" and "threads about "but the polls - |
robbedvoter |
Jan-24-08 05:52 AM |
#10 |
| -
My prediction: Hillary will lose and and continue to employ the disgusting |
cali |
Jan-24-08 05:54 AM |
#12 |
| -
Do you have actual examples, or do you base your pomp on what others say? |
Maribelle |
Jan-24-08 06:02 AM |
#16 |
| -
Soon as I read that post I said to myself.. That sounds like Cali. Sure enough! |
Auntie Bush |
Jan-24-08 02:10 PM |
#18 |
| -
Cali has rabies |
Lirwin2 |
Jan-25-08 06:54 AM |
#24 |
| -
Yep. Just do a search on Cali |
shaniqua6392 |
Jan-25-08 06:59 AM |
#25 |
| -
But the best part, is how she *thinks* she's sooo fair and witty |
Lirwin2 |
Jan-25-08 07:00 AM |
#26 |
| -
"fair and witty"! |
shaniqua6392 |
Jan-25-08 07:43 AM |
#27 |
| -
HAHAHAHAHAHA! GOOD one, shaniqua6392! |
Clinton Crusader |
Jan-26-08 03:40 PM |
#35 |
| -
If Edwards miraculously takes SC, Obama is done for |
sunonmars |
Jan-24-08 05:59 AM |
#15 |
| -
I would love to see Edwards win South Carolina. |
Maribelle |
Jan-24-08 06:03 AM |
#17 |
| -
I say Hillary wins SC 39 to 37. |
Skip Intro |
Jan-24-08 02:13 PM |
#19 |
| -
well that was an objective rundown |
book_worm |
Jan-24-08 02:15 PM |
#20 |
| -
And more facts come to confirm: |
robbedvoter |
Jan-25-08 05:46 AM |
#22 |
| -
And Zogby shows the difference going down again - only 7 this time |
robbedvoter |
Jan-25-08 06:26 AM |
#23 |
| -
I'm betting: not more than 3-4% between all three |
LostinVA |
Jan-25-08 07:48 AM |
#28 |
| -
I'm betting: not more than 3-4% between all three |
LostinVA |
Jan-25-08 07:48 AM |
#29 |
| -
More confirmation - anything is possible: |
robbedvoter |
Jan-25-08 10:02 AM |
#30 |
| -
Another I told you so: Obama 39% Hillary 36% Edwards 22% |
robbedvoter |
Jan-25-08 10:07 PM |
#31 |
| -
Demo info confirming the wild joker scenario: |
robbedvoter |
Jan-26-08 09:53 AM |
#32 |
| -
If Hillary wins SC... |
SaveElmer |
Jan-26-08 09:58 AM |
#33 |
| -
True. Which is why I now hope for Edwards to win. he is favorite son and |
robbedvoter |
Jan-26-08 02:57 PM |
#34 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread