You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: Thanks for bringing that. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Thanks for bringing that.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 08:44 PM by asdjrocky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Edwards running an unsuccessful campaign is not due to the media NJSecularist  Jan-22-08 08:12 PM   #0 
  - "the radical Edwards supporters on this site" LOLOL  Bluebear   Jan-22-08 08:13 PM   #1 
  - Bull. When Obama began running he and Edwards were close in the polls  jackson_dem   Jan-22-08 08:13 PM   #2 
  - Edwards got plenty of media coverage before Iowa  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:20 PM   #7 
     - Sorry. Untruth. Edwards was not getting 1/10 of media Obama & Hillary got  kelligesq   Jan-22-08 08:41 PM   #37 
        - JE was a household name from the POTUS & the VPOTUS, and  madmunchie   Jan-22-08 08:47 PM   #45 
           - Thanks to Oprah n't  durtee librul   Jan-22-08 08:53 PM   #48 
           - Thank you  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:54 PM   #49 
              - If Obama was white, would Edwards have won Iowa?  Labors of Hercules   Jan-23-08 08:19 AM   #91 
  - I disagree for a variety of reasons  LisaM   Jan-22-08 08:16 PM   #3 
  - Thinks can be seen as his misjudgement  Fabio   Jan-22-08 08:31 PM   #22 
     - he's been running since the moment Kerry conceded  GreenArrow   Jan-22-08 09:31 PM   #66 
        - well technically...  Fabio   Jan-23-08 08:03 AM   #89 
  - Wow. Way to lay it out there.  calmblueocean   Jan-22-08 08:16 PM   #4 
  - It's not wholly due to the media, no. But are you saying coverage disparity had no effect at all?  jpgray   Jan-22-08 08:17 PM   #5 
  - A great ground game and a sound message  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:24 PM   #10 
     - Yeah, yeah, and Obama can walk on water!  Andy823   Jan-22-08 08:33 PM   #24 
        - Obama has built his base  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:34 PM   #27 
           - Dear Obama Supporter-his base doesnt show up to vote - New Hamshire remember?  kelligesq   Jan-22-08 08:45 PM   #42 
           - I hold no allegiance to any candidate right now.  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:48 PM   #46 
           - And I guess I am sick and tired of hearing HRC and BO mouth  durtee librul   Jan-22-08 08:52 PM   #47 
           - Obama could build his base because  never_get_over_it   Jan-22-08 09:22 PM   #64 
  - Civil? Okay.  Tennessee Gal   Jan-22-08 08:17 PM   #6 
  - Shouldn't that have given Edwards the advantage?  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:25 PM   #11 
     - Ha!  Tennessee Gal   Jan-22-08 08:33 PM   #26 
        - Wrong  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:35 PM   #29 
           - It has to do with "historical".  Tennessee Gal   Jan-22-08 08:37 PM   #33 
           - yes, a viable African American and a viable woman  GreenArrow   Jan-22-08 09:54 PM   #74 
           - Southern white man  unc70   Jan-23-08 12:12 AM   #86 
  - You are absolutely right. But don't expect the Edwards "dead enders"  2rth2pwr   Jan-22-08 08:23 PM   #8 
  - You don't think the media has spun this campaign at all?  timeforarevolution   Jan-22-08 08:26 PM   #12 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-22-08 09:49 PM   #71 
     - 1 - 10 of about 1,820,000 for deadenders (About this page) - 0.27 sec  2rth2pwr   Jan-22-08 10:36 PM   #80 
  - Another "failure" meme to try to counteract Edwards winning the debate  melody   Jan-22-08 08:24 PM   #9 
  - Huh?  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:26 PM   #14 
     - It was present in your purpose -- to knock John. Who are you backing?  melody   Jan-22-08 08:36 PM   #30 
        - Sorry, my intention is not to bash John  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:42 PM   #39 
           - Oh, c'mon now  melody   Jan-22-08 09:03 PM   #55 
              - This thread isn't about Hillary or Obama  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 09:12 PM   #60 
                 - What are radical supporters? People who put their money and action where their mouths are?  melody   Jan-22-08 09:31 PM   #65 
  - Actually Huckabee is almost out of money...  polichick   Jan-22-08 08:26 PM   #13 
  - I don't think he's out of money  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:29 PM   #16 
  - It was reported today that he's on a shoestring budget...  polichick   Jan-22-08 08:30 PM   #18 
  - Is that true? I hadn't heard that.  Auntie Bush   Jan-22-08 08:40 PM   #36 
  - Late this morning msnbc or cnn (can't recall which) ran a short piece...  polichick   Jan-22-08 08:45 PM   #43 
     - Thanks for the reply. Sounds about right on to me.  Auntie Bush   Jan-22-08 09:00 PM   #53 
  - Heard today, staffers working for free....  lisainmilo   Jan-22-08 08:57 PM   #51 
  - Yes, I heard he is asking staff to continue w/o pay n/t  Emit   Jan-22-08 09:03 PM   #54 
  - Agreed, but good luck reasoning with Edheads.  Occam Bandage   Jan-22-08 08:27 PM   #15 
  - haha  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:30 PM   #19 
  - Now, now, "keep it civil"!  Bluebear   Jan-22-08 08:37 PM   #34 
  - This is coming from an expert on reason, no doubt?  jpgray   Jan-22-08 08:32 PM   #23 
     - I'm not going to deny that media coverage is a vicious circle.  Occam Bandage   Jan-22-08 08:35 PM   #28 
        - Gotta hand it to you, Occam...  timeforarevolution   Jan-22-08 08:39 PM   #35 
        - I'd argue it was an unfair disparity. But then my ideal campaign coverage focuses on the issues  jpgray   Jan-22-08 08:44 PM   #41 
  - It's all about ratings and money for the MSM  Beaverhausen   Jan-22-08 08:29 PM   #17 
  - He doesn't need media exposure?  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:33 PM   #25 
  - The Hillary/Obama 'war' = Paris Hilton/Nicole Richie spat  sjdnb   Jan-22-08 08:30 PM   #20 
  - Really?  asdjrocky   Jan-22-08 08:31 PM   # 
  - I'm just wondering what you think JE could have done differently..  K Gardner   Jan-22-08 08:31 PM   #21 
  - It's tough for me to say  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:42 PM   #38 
  - I think he could have won in 2004. I may be alone in thinking that, but  K Gardner   Jan-22-08 08:56 PM   #50 
  - He had little to no impact on Kerry's ticket  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 09:06 PM   #57 
     - Yeah, but I think that was because he wasn't on top of the ticket. Just an opinion  K Gardner   Jan-22-08 09:07 PM   #58 
     - He was also barely utilized.  Occam Bandage   Jan-22-08 09:15 PM   #62 
     - My question is...  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 09:19 PM   #63 
     - Sorry again. Either you're Kerry's wife or a kerry-Obama plant - Kerry was not the draw in 2004 - JE  kelligesq   Jan-22-08 09:46 PM   #69 
        - Huh?  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 09:51 PM   #73 
  - "non-establishment candidate"  GreenArrow   Jan-22-08 09:46 PM   #68 
  - Quick Monday-morning quarterbacking:  Occam Bandage   Jan-22-08 08:59 PM   #52 
     - Good post  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 09:05 PM   #56 
     - That actually *was* a very thoughtful post, OB ! Nice.  K Gardner   Jan-22-08 09:09 PM   #59 
     - I'm scanning this thread, after having posted my own questioning his MESSAGE...  timeforarevolution   Jan-22-08 10:01 PM   #76 
  - Yes, it is a major reason  no name no slogan   Jan-22-08 08:36 PM   #31 
  - Thanks for bringing that.  asdjrocky   Jan-22-08 08:44 PM   #40 
  - Well, objective media studies show quite clearly a lack of coverage  depakid   Jan-22-08 08:36 PM   #32 
  - It was a gamble  NJSecularist   Jan-22-08 08:46 PM   #44 
     - Excuse me, but just to be clear  zalinda   Jan-22-08 09:15 PM   #61 
        - you're incorrect in that. He spent 2-3 weeks more in IA over the last YEAR  cali   Jan-23-08 08:16 AM   #90 
  - This story from 2 weeks ago didn't help John either  Redstate Red Herring   Jan-22-08 09:32 PM   #67 
  - As expected, no one is willing to fight for the workers ... normal folks  sjdnb   Jan-22-08 09:49 PM   #72 
  - How would this have hurt Edwards? n/t  timeforarevolution   Jan-22-08 09:57 PM   #75 
     - Most local/state/regional CoC's are small to medium sized businesses ...  sjdnb   Jan-22-08 10:18 PM   #77 
        - Hi, sjdnb....  timeforarevolution   Jan-22-08 10:23 PM   #78 
           - What I'm saying is that the CoC members I'm familiar with  sjdnb   Jan-22-08 10:30 PM   #79 
              - Gotcha. Thank you very, very much for answering....  timeforarevolution   Jan-22-08 10:40 PM   #81 
              - U.S. CoC nationally is now a Repub front roganization  unc70   Jan-22-08 11:10 PM   #82 
                 - Maybe where you're from, but in my area, the CoCs  sjdnb   Jan-22-08 11:20 PM   #83 
  - John Edwards is being ignored  Blue_In_AK   Jan-22-08 09:47 PM   #70 
  - John Edwards' race and gender are NOT going against him in this election cycle  EffieBlack   Jan-22-08 11:32 PM   #84 
     - Will you admit that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama  Blue_In_AK   Jan-23-08 12:05 AM   #85 
        - Yes, I agree that they have gotten more media attention because of their gender and race  EffieBlack   Jan-23-08 12:14 AM   #87 
  - Oh please...  fooj   Jan-23-08 12:41 AM   #88 
  - I agree he shouldn't have put all his eggs in  calico1   Jan-23-08 08:28 AM   #92 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC