You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: No and that wasn't the point I was making. The OP [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. No and that wasn't the point I was making. The OP
has posted thread after thread after thread bashing Clinton and Edwards. Every freakin' day. It's all he/she does. He/she must spend hours a day looking for articles that fit his/her perceptions of Hillary or Edwards all in his/her quest to attack Obama's opponents. It's pathetic. It has nothing to do with how Obama or Hillary or Edwards behave in the campaign.

Just FYI, all presidential candidates pick out the worst about their opponent and expose it. It's the way the game is played. If Obama doesn't want people to continue talking about his Illinois voting record, he needs to address it better than he did last night. Maybe he should publish the Illinois Legislature Rule that explains the "Present" vote? It's not Hillary's or Edwards' job to do that for him and the OP needs to stop whining about it. I notice the OP hasn't posted about how bad Obama was for exposing Hillary's stint on Walmart's BOD. Funny that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -John Edwards getting as bad as Clinton gaiilonfong  Jan-22-08 10:10 AM   #0 
  - Edwards will probably apologize for it by tomorrow.  Bleachers7   Jan-22-08 10:12 AM   #1 
  - lol. I would have to agree.  Lirwin2   Jan-22-08 12:43 PM   #24 
  - Ok i see you are a little  LibFromWV   Jan-22-08 10:13 AM   #2 
  - If Obama can't defend himself now, just  Mags   Jan-22-08 10:14 AM   #3 
  - Obama has been defending himself. This appears to be a game to try  wisteria   Jan-22-08 03:19 PM   #59 
  - Waaaaaaaaaaaaah Waaaaaaaaaa Waaaaaaaah!  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 10:14 AM   #4 
  - Like it or leave it?  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 11:43 AM   #16 
     - NO. It's...If you can't handle politics, don't participate. The OP does nothing but post  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 11:56 AM   #19 
        - So you're fine with politics as usual then?  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 12:15 PM   #20 
        - No and that wasn't the point I was making. The OP  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 12:39 PM   #23 
           - Exposing weaknesses is one thing  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 12:47 PM   #26 
              - If Obama doesn't want an opponent to play on the ignorance of voters, he could fix it within minutes  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 01:00 PM   #30 
              - I would hope that before nailing someone on something  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 01:08 PM   #33 
                 - WHY? It's not their job to do Obama's work for him. n/t  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 01:18 PM   #36 
                    - So you do feel that it's appropriate to spread lies  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 01:34 PM   #40 
                       - No. How does anyone know it's a lie? Obama hasn't fully explained it.  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 01:40 PM   #41 
                          - As you and I both know  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 01:49 PM   #42 
                             - No I am not interested in playing on the ignorance of the voters,  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 01:56 PM   #44 
                                - Let's take this out of a Hillary/Obama/Edwards debate  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 02:02 PM   #46 
                                   - Me thinks you just proved Hillary's point.  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 02:18 PM   #48 
                                      - That's politics though  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 02:27 PM   #49 
                                         - Right. That's what's important on this bill...the Pro-Choice Bill, but we know nothing about the  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 02:46 PM   #50 
                                            - The difference is...  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 02:57 PM   #51 
                                               - Well, Obama did vote to fund the Iraq War, so I think that is a moot point.  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 04:02 PM   #60 
                                               - I never defended the OP  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 04:24 PM   #61 
              - Like the Obama campaign took  BlackVelvet04   Jan-22-08 03:00 PM   #52 
                 - Just like that.  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 03:03 PM   #54 
                    - Like it's something new to politics  BlackVelvet04   Jan-22-08 03:07 PM   #55 
                       - I never understand that mindset  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 03:11 PM   #57 
        - Well said.  Jamastiene   Jan-22-08 12:56 PM   #29 
           - the bot just posted another one  CatWoman   Jan-22-08 01:09 PM   #34 
              - LOL..."the bot"  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-22-08 01:19 PM   #37 
                 - Really a bot.  Jamastiene   Jan-22-08 01:52 PM   #43 
  - Do you have the name of the individual who is  midnight   Jan-22-08 10:15 AM   #5 
  - and he was the sponsor of some of those bills!!!  bpeale   Jan-22-08 12:44 PM   #25 
  - Okay, I'll stipulate hair/house/hedge fund, but Edwards is right  Rydz777   Jan-22-08 10:16 AM   #6 
  - When two contrasting candidates agree on something  Tarc   Jan-22-08 10:17 AM   #7 
  - Or they are both against the third candidate  karynnj   Jan-22-08 11:33 AM   #15 
  - It really shows the power of Edwards  PsN2Wind   Jan-22-08 10:20 AM   #8 
  - No way could he  stillcool47   Jan-22-08 10:20 AM   #9 
  - No, he just demonstrated his inability to see that things are inherently complex.  Mass   Jan-22-08 10:25 AM   #10 
  - Excellent response  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 11:52 AM   #17 
  - Or, he just demonstrated his ability to simplify his understanding  sfexpat2000   Jan-22-08 01:00 PM   #31 
  - And yet you can excuse Obama's $3 million house, and his continued  AndyA   Jan-22-08 10:30 AM   #11 
  - Except for the most important one.  Cant trust em   Jan-22-08 11:54 AM   #18 
  - Check out Obama's Senate vote record. Lots of NV or was absent. nt  lyonn   Jan-22-08 10:37 AM   #12 
  - yep, Obama continued his voting pattern in the US Senate  NYCALIZ   Jan-22-08 10:49 AM   #14 
  - yeah, I wish Edwards didnt go there  LSK   Jan-22-08 10:39 AM   #13 
  - Has Edwards ever praised Reagan.. I don't think so.....  B Calm   Jan-22-08 12:18 PM   #21 
  - NAFTA passed Senate 1993. Edwards elected to Senate 1998. If you want to adhere to facts.  Garbo 2004   Jan-22-08 12:35 PM   #22 
  - White guy or gay latino?  ronnykmarshall   Jan-22-08 12:48 PM   #27 
  - Transgendered or African American?  William769   Jan-22-08 12:53 PM   #28 
  - Criticizing Obama for something he did actually do is perfectly fair  CreekDog   Jan-22-08 01:01 PM   #32 
  - You're slamming Mr. Edwards now, I see -- leave the man alone  LostinVA   Jan-22-08 01:10 PM   #35 
  - Well he can't decide what race he belongs to, Just like he can't decide who to slam.  William769   Jan-22-08 01:26 PM   #39 
  - Are you still here?  EstimatedProphet   Jan-22-08 01:19 PM   #38 
  - Bueller? Bueller?  Sugar Smack   Jan-22-08 02:01 PM   #45 
  - I vote gaiilonfong off the island  mitchtv   Jan-22-08 02:16 PM   #47 
  - I guess negative attention is better than none......  BlackVelvet04   Jan-22-08 03:01 PM   #53 
  - "His campaign surrogate is on" --- who is the surrogate? What are they "on"?  Bluebear   Jan-22-08 03:09 PM   #56 
  - What ? Is he play tag with Clinton now? n/t  wisteria   Jan-22-08 03:16 PM   #58 
  - Sorry you feel that way... I'm with MLK III... I think he's the best man for the job.  redqueen   Jan-22-08 04:26 PM   #62 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC