Mags
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-22-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. If Obama can't defend himself now, just |
|
think how weak he will be against any Republican.
|
| -John Edwards getting as bad as Clinton |
gaiilonfong |
Jan-22-08 10:10 AM |
#0 |
 -
Edwards will probably apologize for it by tomorrow. |
Bleachers7 |
Jan-22-08 10:12 AM |
#1 |
  -
lol. I would have to agree. |
Lirwin2 |
Jan-22-08 12:43 PM |
#24 |
| -
Ok i see you are a little |
LibFromWV |
Jan-22-08 10:13 AM |
#2 |
| -
If Obama can't defend himself now, just |
Mags |
Jan-22-08 10:14 AM |
#3 |
| -
Obama has been defending himself. This appears to be a game to try |
wisteria |
Jan-22-08 03:19 PM |
#59 |
| -
Waaaaaaaaaaaaah Waaaaaaaaaa Waaaaaaaah! |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 10:14 AM |
#4 |
| -
Like it or leave it? |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 11:43 AM |
#16 |
| -
NO. It's...If you can't handle politics, don't participate. The OP does nothing but post |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 11:56 AM |
#19 |
| -
So you're fine with politics as usual then? |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 12:15 PM |
#20 |
| -
No and that wasn't the point I was making. The OP |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 12:39 PM |
#23 |
| -
Exposing weaknesses is one thing |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 12:47 PM |
#26 |
| -
If Obama doesn't want an opponent to play on the ignorance of voters, he could fix it within minutes |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 01:00 PM |
#30 |
| -
I would hope that before nailing someone on something |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 01:08 PM |
#33 |
| -
WHY? It's not their job to do Obama's work for him. n/t |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 01:18 PM |
#36 |
| -
So you do feel that it's appropriate to spread lies |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 01:34 PM |
#40 |
| -
No. How does anyone know it's a lie? Obama hasn't fully explained it. |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 01:40 PM |
#41 |
| -
As you and I both know |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 01:49 PM |
#42 |
| -
No I am not interested in playing on the ignorance of the voters, |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 01:56 PM |
#44 |
| -
Let's take this out of a Hillary/Obama/Edwards debate |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 02:02 PM |
#46 |
| -
Me thinks you just proved Hillary's point. |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 02:18 PM |
#48 |
| -
That's politics though |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 02:27 PM |
#49 |
| -
Right. That's what's important on this bill...the Pro-Choice Bill, but we know nothing about the |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 02:46 PM |
#50 |
| -
The difference is... |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 02:57 PM |
#51 |
| -
Well, Obama did vote to fund the Iraq War, so I think that is a moot point. |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 04:02 PM |
#60 |
| -
I never defended the OP |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 04:24 PM |
#61 |
| -
Like the Obama campaign took |
BlackVelvet04 |
Jan-22-08 03:00 PM |
#52 |
| -
Just like that. |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 03:03 PM |
#54 |
| -
Like it's something new to politics |
BlackVelvet04 |
Jan-22-08 03:07 PM |
#55 |
| -
I never understand that mindset |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 03:11 PM |
#57 |
| -
Well said. |
Jamastiene |
Jan-22-08 12:56 PM |
#29 |
| -
the bot just posted another one |
CatWoman |
Jan-22-08 01:09 PM |
#34 |
| -
LOL..."the bot" |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jan-22-08 01:19 PM |
#37 |
| -
Really a bot. |
Jamastiene |
Jan-22-08 01:52 PM |
#43 |
| -
Do you have the name of the individual who is |
midnight |
Jan-22-08 10:15 AM |
#5 |
| -
and he was the sponsor of some of those bills!!! |
bpeale |
Jan-22-08 12:44 PM |
#25 |
| -
Okay, I'll stipulate hair/house/hedge fund, but Edwards is right |
Rydz777 |
Jan-22-08 10:16 AM |
#6 |
| -
When two contrasting candidates agree on something |
Tarc |
Jan-22-08 10:17 AM |
#7 |
| -
Or they are both against the third candidate |
karynnj |
Jan-22-08 11:33 AM |
#15 |
| -
It really shows the power of Edwards |
PsN2Wind |
Jan-22-08 10:20 AM |
#8 |
| -
No way could he |
stillcool47 |
Jan-22-08 10:20 AM |
#9 |
| -
No, he just demonstrated his inability to see that things are inherently complex. |
Mass |
Jan-22-08 10:25 AM |
#10 |
| -
Excellent response |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 11:52 AM |
#17 |
| -
Or, he just demonstrated his ability to simplify his understanding |
sfexpat2000 |
Jan-22-08 01:00 PM |
#31 |
| -
And yet you can excuse Obama's $3 million house, and his continued |
AndyA |
Jan-22-08 10:30 AM |
#11 |
| -
Except for the most important one. |
Cant trust em |
Jan-22-08 11:54 AM |
#18 |
| -
Check out Obama's Senate vote record. Lots of NV or was absent. nt |
lyonn |
Jan-22-08 10:37 AM |
#12 |
| -
yep, Obama continued his voting pattern in the US Senate |
NYCALIZ |
Jan-22-08 10:49 AM |
#14 |
| -
yeah, I wish Edwards didnt go there |
LSK |
Jan-22-08 10:39 AM |
#13 |
| -
Has Edwards ever praised Reagan.. I don't think so..... |
B Calm |
Jan-22-08 12:18 PM |
#21 |
| -
NAFTA passed Senate 1993. Edwards elected to Senate 1998. If you want to adhere to facts. |
Garbo 2004 |
Jan-22-08 12:35 PM |
#22 |
| -
White guy or gay latino? |
ronnykmarshall |
Jan-22-08 12:48 PM |
#27 |
| -
Transgendered or African American? |
William769 |
Jan-22-08 12:53 PM |
#28 |
| -
Criticizing Obama for something he did actually do is perfectly fair |
CreekDog |
Jan-22-08 01:01 PM |
#32 |
| -
You're slamming Mr. Edwards now, I see -- leave the man alone |
LostinVA |
Jan-22-08 01:10 PM |
#35 |
| -
Well he can't decide what race he belongs to, Just like he can't decide who to slam. |
William769 |
Jan-22-08 01:26 PM |
#39 |
| -
Are you still here? |
EstimatedProphet |
Jan-22-08 01:19 PM |
#38 |
| -
Bueller? Bueller? |
Sugar Smack |
Jan-22-08 02:01 PM |
#45 |
| -
I vote gaiilonfong off the island |
mitchtv |
Jan-22-08 02:16 PM |
#47 |
| -
I guess negative attention is better than none...... |
BlackVelvet04 |
Jan-22-08 03:01 PM |
#53 |
| -
"His campaign surrogate is on" --- who is the surrogate? What are they "on"? |
Bluebear |
Jan-22-08 03:09 PM |
#56 |
| -
What ? Is he play tag with Clinton now? n/t |
wisteria |
Jan-22-08 03:16 PM |
#58 |
| -
Sorry you feel that way... I'm with MLK III... I think he's the best man for the job. |
redqueen |
Jan-22-08 04:26 PM |
#62 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread