AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #53 |
| 110. The Interest of the Networks' Parent Corporations Trump Even Ratings |
|
For example, NBC will promote the war, and warmonger candidates, no matter how unpopular they are, and even if it decimates their ratings, because GE makes more money off the war than they do off of NBC. 
|
| -It’s about ELECTABILITY, stupid! |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 09:24 PM |
#0 |
-
so basically your message is: |
maddiejoan |
Jan-11-08 09:26 PM |
#1 |
 -
Our warring sides can come together over your comment |
hnmnf |
Jan-11-08 09:28 PM |
#8 |
 -
But, is it a big white penis... |
goldcanyonaz |
Jan-11-08 09:31 PM |
#11 |
  -
Bigger than the Clenis?? |
maddiejoan |
Jan-11-08 09:33 PM |
#16 |
 -
Watch out, that phrase could really catch on! |
JohnnyLib2 |
Jan-11-08 09:33 PM |
#17 |
  -
You owe me a monitor |
maddiejoan |
Jan-11-08 09:35 PM |
#18 |
 -
Please, take the phrase to the Lounge! |
JohnnyLib2 |
Jan-11-08 09:37 PM |
#21 |
 -
For you |
maddiejoan |
Jan-11-08 09:58 PM |
#31 |
 -
LOL! nt |
libbygurl |
Jan-11-08 10:07 PM |
#34 |
 -
..... |
indimuse |
Jan-12-08 07:45 AM |
#83 |
-
Obama has thus far shown the ability to attract Independents and... |
Kristi1696 |
Jan-11-08 09:26 PM |
#2 |
 -
So they say. Edwards is doing a good job of that also but you will never hear about it. nt |
Snotcicles |
Jan-11-08 09:32 PM |
#14 |
-
KickedandR'd |
FlyingSquirrel |
Jan-11-08 09:26 PM |
#3 |
-
So we should never have a Black or Female President because it would upset the GOP? |
Taverner |
Jan-11-08 09:27 PM |
#4 |
 -
It's not about "upsetting" the GOP |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 09:52 PM |
#29 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-08 09:27 PM |
#5 |
 -
I dislike the fact that she used the politics of fear. |
Laurab |
Jan-11-08 09:51 PM |
#28 |
-
I like Edwards, |
heraldsqure |
Jan-11-08 09:28 PM |
#6 |
 -
Oh well, lots psycho-babble |
zidzi |
Jan-11-08 09:32 PM |
#13 |
 -
He won everything, silly. The corporate media keeps it secret from us. To prop |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:40 AM |
#81 |
 -
On the other hand |
Andy823 |
Jan-12-08 12:49 PM |
#98 |
-
Well that was to cute for words... |
mth44sc |
Jan-11-08 09:28 PM |
#7 |
 -
What are you talking about? |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 09:33 PM |
#15 |
  -
I don't imagine you can/ N/t |
mth44sc |
Jan-11-08 09:35 PM |
#19 |
 -
But he is selling stuff apparently? n/t |
JoeIsOneOfUs |
Jan-11-08 09:41 PM |
#23 |
-
Must. Protect. Market. |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:41 AM |
#82 |
-
They have their dismal inept record of governing for the past eight years |
Snotcicles |
Jan-11-08 09:30 PM |
#9 |
-
You may be right. I don't know. |
Benhurst |
Jan-11-08 09:31 PM |
#10 |
-
John Edwards because he's a white male |
Crunchy Frog |
Jan-11-08 09:32 PM |
#12 |
 -
Unfortunately, yes |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 09:42 PM |
#24 |
-
A part of me does not want to agree with you...but Alas..... |
BlueJazz |
Jan-11-08 09:36 PM |
#20 |
 -
So do I, and I agree. |
Benhurst |
Jan-11-08 10:23 PM |
#41 |
-
Gosh! Thanks for bringing your wisdom to DU! |
gateley |
Jan-11-08 09:39 PM |
#22 |
 -
kinda hard the believe |
mth44sc |
Jan-11-08 09:43 PM |
#25 |
-
It was his/her choice of a certain word that got my blood boiling. Unnecessary. nt |
gateley |
Jan-11-08 10:00 PM |
#33 |
-
Please note - it wasn't MY word but THEIRSl |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 10:10 PM |
#35 |
-
Who is THEY -- do you have a link? nt |
gateley |
Jan-11-08 10:17 PM |
#39 |
 -
THEY are the knuckle-dragging Repugs |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 10:25 PM |
#42 |
-
Yes, we know you can find them everywhere, like on that board you previously |
gateley |
Jan-11-08 10:31 PM |
#43 |
-
No, you reflect the GOP mindset |
cali |
Jan-12-08 01:51 AM |
#59 |
-
The bulk of the middle class are getting screwed |
2hip |
Jan-12-08 02:14 AM |
#61 |
-
They're all cribbing from each other. |
cali |
Jan-12-08 02:52 AM |
#68 |
-
Edwards is shown to be the only candidate who can beat all the Repubs... |
Triana |
Jan-11-08 09:47 PM |
#26 |
 -
No. Not even close. |
cali |
Jan-12-08 01:53 AM |
#60 |
-
Now tell me how the GOP will frame Obama or Hillary? |
2hip |
Jan-12-08 02:30 AM |
#63 |
-
Of course it's largely about money and frames. duh. |
cali |
Jan-12-08 02:44 AM |
#66 |
-
So you think the Obama/Clinton money machines can beat the GOP? |
2hip |
Jan-12-08 03:02 AM |
#69 |
-
This is not 2004. And in 2000 Gore won. Or didn't you know that? |
cali |
Jan-12-08 03:12 AM |
#71 |
-
Last national election GOP won - 1988. Afer that - straight loss and theft. Edwards knows |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:46 AM |
#84 |
-
Agreed. If Obama is the Dem candidate, Huckabee will be the Repug President. |
kelligesq |
Jan-11-08 09:51 PM |
#27 |
 -
A Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can’t Win |
EVDebs |
Jan-11-08 11:07 PM |
#45 |
-
Great links and analysis! |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 11:38 PM |
#48 |
-
Thanks. The media bargain appears to be 'don't get specific' . Check this out... |
EVDebs |
Jan-11-08 11:47 PM |
#50 |
-
If the Grassroots shout loud enough, the media will come |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 11:57 PM |
#53 |
-
I was really angry at CNN today 4 not giving JE as much time as the others so this is email i sent |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:34 PM |
#101 |
-
The Interest of the Networks' Parent Corporations Trump Even Ratings |
AndyTiedye |
Jan-15-08 08:26 PM |
#110 |
-
So your argument for Edwards is he is electable because he is a white man? |
BrentTaylor |
Jan-11-08 09:54 PM |
#30 |
 -
No my argument for Edwards is he's the most acceptable because he's not Bushlite |
kelligesq |
Jan-11-08 10:12 PM |
#37 |
 -
How will the GOP see Obama and Clinton? |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 10:22 PM |
# |
-
No, I think female unknown name wouldn't have a chance at all - out in first |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 02:33 AM |
#65 |
-
How about a KNOWN female name -- like Boxer, for instance? |
2hip |
Jan-12-08 02:46 AM |
#67 |
-
2 Hip, I added to my last post - do read pls - now onto Boxer |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:04 AM |
#70 |
-
You seem to be coming from the JE camp |
alittlelark |
Jan-11-08 09:59 PM |
#32 |
 -
playing a little race card are you ? read the rest of my posts, jr. |
kelligesq |
Jan-11-08 10:14 PM |
#38 |
-
Actually, |
alittlelark |
Jan-11-08 11:21 PM |
#46 |
-
"Obvious and ugly" nonsense and repetitive attempts to bait. Silly games |
kelligesq |
Jan-11-08 11:28 PM |
#47 |
-
Wow, I've never felt threatened enough to 'ignore' someone. |
alittlelark |
Jan-11-08 11:43 PM |
#49 |
-
Hillary & Obama |
The River |
Jan-11-08 10:10 PM |
#36 |
-
so we better vote for Edwards? |
Skittles |
Jan-11-08 10:22 PM |
#40 |
 -
And the new & improved 2009 GOP WH will bring you -- WHAT? |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 10:50 PM |
#44 |
  -
I refuse to pander to racists and bigots and homophobes and mysoginists |
Skittles |
Jan-12-08 06:18 AM |
#77 |
 -
They'll go for Huckabee or Bloomberg once he's in the race. |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 10:22 AM |
#89 |
 -
Interesting on news: only 16% New Yorkers would vote for Blumberg - not good news for him |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:27 PM |
#100 |
 -
Obama will probably make Colin Powell DefSec for his endorsement |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 12:03 AM |
#55 |
-
I cant envision Powell accepting any office after what he's been through |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:33 AM |
#74 |
 -
The Economy should be topic #1 at any debate. Edwards has it locked |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 10:19 AM |
#88 |
-
I don't care for Edwards, HRC OR Obama |
Skittles |
Jan-12-08 07:54 AM |
#85 |
-
dont blame you, but many do not buy into those crowned by the MSM |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:24 PM |
#99 |
-
really? |
Skittles |
Jan-12-08 08:23 PM |
#107 |
-
Actually, it's still "It's the Economy, Stupid" and with the Fed cutting rates |
EVDebs |
Jan-11-08 11:51 PM |
#51 |
 -
Recession. Other than Bill Clinton or Robert Rubin, can you name anyone |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:38 AM |
#75 |
-
Edwards. Period. Obama can't and Hillary can't |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 10:42 AM |
#92 |
-
EVDebs - you're right about the big "D" word - yes it's the economy |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:50 PM |
#102 |
-
Income redistribution is needed FAST. Too much concentrated in Bush's top 1% |
EVDebs |
Jan-13-08 02:06 PM |
#108 |
-
Nominating Clinton is suicide for us, but Obama will be liked by both sides. |
Oregonian |
Jan-11-08 11:56 PM |
#52 |
 -
Widely despised but look at that delegate count, won't you ? |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 12:01 AM |
#54 |
  -
I know. It's so frustrating that a person who wants to take on corporations |
Oregonian |
Jan-12-08 12:27 AM |
#57 |
 -
Obama will be a much much better choice for the Republicans |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:16 AM |
#72 |
 -
Agree 100%, a Hillary nomination would GUARANTEE the Repukes retain control of the WhiteHouse |
ShadowLiberal |
Jan-12-08 12:05 AM |
#56 |
 -
Sure both sides like Obama who never met a lobbyest he didnt like including the mob |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:56 PM |
#104 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-12-08 01:43 AM |
#58 |
 -
And while at it, better be a Republican man, too! ("electability" comes down to that eventually) |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:31 AM |
#80 |
-
You are right... but I don't think you really understand how a lot |
Bread and Circus |
Jan-12-08 02:24 AM |
#62 |
-
Yeah, Well... |
Steely_Dan |
Jan-12-08 02:31 AM |
#64 |
-
You all speak as if there's going to be a legitimate election without fixed machines - guess |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:28 AM |
#73 |
-
I think we should run a dog for president, just to humiliate the Republicans. |
Perry Logan |
Jan-12-08 05:46 AM |
#76 |
 -
Then in 2009, Bush's War will be Hillary's War |
martymar64 |
Jan-12-08 12:19 PM |
#97 |
-
I hear apolitical people say 'all I know is I hate Clinton' |
NoBorders |
Jan-12-08 07:23 AM |
#78 |
 -
the media demonized her beyond the point of logic |
Skittles |
Jan-12-08 07:55 AM |
#86 |
-
They really created an image |
NoBorders |
Jan-12-08 08:02 AM |
#87 |
-
Electability is about stupid! (MSM made - meaning "who we tell you to vote for") |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:26 AM |
#79 |
-
The three of them are electable. It's just that Obama is the best candidate |
Katzenkavalier |
Jan-12-08 10:22 AM |
#90 |
 -
Edwards would be the best President |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 10:25 AM |
#91 |
  -
EVDEBS - from your link - Bank Governors talking big D word |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 11:58 AM |
#93 |
 -
google Harpers Magazine + Obama to find out who Obama is.. |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 12:02 PM |
#95 |
-
It’s about ELECTABILITY, stupid? - Not so, Bush swiped two elections, h-e-l-l-o...! |
Imagevision |
Jan-12-08 12:00 PM |
#94 |
 -
Fixed machines. And the sheeple wanted to have a beer with him n/t |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 12:04 PM |
#96 |
-
Edwards will be out of the race on February 6th |
zulchzulu |
Jan-12-08 07:56 PM |
#103 |
 -
Thanks. I'll wait to hear it from the man himself - not wishful thinking of yours :) |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 08:04 PM |
#105 |
-
and he' clean too... |
ileus |
Jan-12-08 08:08 PM |
#106 |
-
What are you up to? Smearing all three front-running Dem candidates at once... |
Mister Ed |
Jan-13-08 02:33 PM |
#109 |