Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-11-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 30. So your argument for Edwards is he is electable because he is a white man? |
| -It’s about ELECTABILITY, stupid! |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 09:24 PM |
#0 |
 -
so basically your message is: |
maddiejoan |
Jan-11-08 09:26 PM |
#1 |
 -
Our warring sides can come together over your comment |
hnmnf |
Jan-11-08 09:28 PM |
#8 |
| -
But, is it a big white penis... |
goldcanyonaz |
Jan-11-08 09:31 PM |
#11 |
 -
Bigger than the Clenis?? |
maddiejoan |
Jan-11-08 09:33 PM |
#16 |
| -
Watch out, that phrase could really catch on! |
JohnnyLib2 |
Jan-11-08 09:33 PM |
#17 |
| -
You owe me a monitor |
maddiejoan |
Jan-11-08 09:35 PM |
#18 |
| -
Please, take the phrase to the Lounge! |
JohnnyLib2 |
Jan-11-08 09:37 PM |
#21 |
| -
For you |
maddiejoan |
Jan-11-08 09:58 PM |
#31 |
| -
LOL! nt |
libbygurl |
Jan-11-08 10:07 PM |
#34 |
| -
..... |
indimuse |
Jan-12-08 07:45 AM |
#83 |
| -
Obama has thus far shown the ability to attract Independents and... |
Kristi1696 |
Jan-11-08 09:26 PM |
#2 |
| -
So they say. Edwards is doing a good job of that also but you will never hear about it. nt |
Snotcicles |
Jan-11-08 09:32 PM |
#14 |
| -
KickedandR'd |
FlyingSquirrel |
Jan-11-08 09:26 PM |
#3 |
| -
So we should never have a Black or Female President because it would upset the GOP? |
Taverner |
Jan-11-08 09:27 PM |
#4 |
| -
It's not about "upsetting" the GOP |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 09:52 PM |
#29 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-08 09:27 PM |
#5 |
| -
I dislike the fact that she used the politics of fear. |
Laurab |
Jan-11-08 09:51 PM |
#28 |
| -
I like Edwards, |
heraldsqure |
Jan-11-08 09:28 PM |
#6 |
| -
Oh well, lots psycho-babble |
zidzi |
Jan-11-08 09:32 PM |
#13 |
| -
He won everything, silly. The corporate media keeps it secret from us. To prop |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:40 AM |
#81 |
| -
On the other hand |
Andy823 |
Jan-12-08 12:49 PM |
#98 |
| -
Well that was to cute for words... |
mth44sc |
Jan-11-08 09:28 PM |
#7 |
| -
What are you talking about? |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 09:33 PM |
#15 |
| -
I don't imagine you can/ N/t |
mth44sc |
Jan-11-08 09:35 PM |
#19 |
| -
But he is selling stuff apparently? n/t |
JoeIsOneOfUs |
Jan-11-08 09:41 PM |
#23 |
| -
Must. Protect. Market. |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:41 AM |
#82 |
| -
They have their dismal inept record of governing for the past eight years |
Snotcicles |
Jan-11-08 09:30 PM |
#9 |
| -
You may be right. I don't know. |
Benhurst |
Jan-11-08 09:31 PM |
#10 |
| -
John Edwards because he's a white male |
Crunchy Frog |
Jan-11-08 09:32 PM |
#12 |
| -
Unfortunately, yes |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 09:42 PM |
#24 |
| -
A part of me does not want to agree with you...but Alas..... |
BlueJazz |
Jan-11-08 09:36 PM |
#20 |
| -
So do I, and I agree. |
Benhurst |
Jan-11-08 10:23 PM |
#41 |
| -
Gosh! Thanks for bringing your wisdom to DU! |
gateley |
Jan-11-08 09:39 PM |
#22 |
| -
kinda hard the believe |
mth44sc |
Jan-11-08 09:43 PM |
#25 |
| -
It was his/her choice of a certain word that got my blood boiling. Unnecessary. nt |
gateley |
Jan-11-08 10:00 PM |
#33 |
| -
Please note - it wasn't MY word but THEIRSl |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 10:10 PM |
#35 |
| -
Who is THEY -- do you have a link? nt |
gateley |
Jan-11-08 10:17 PM |
#39 |
| -
THEY are the knuckle-dragging Repugs |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 10:25 PM |
#42 |
| -
Yes, we know you can find them everywhere, like on that board you previously |
gateley |
Jan-11-08 10:31 PM |
#43 |
| -
No, you reflect the GOP mindset |
cali |
Jan-12-08 01:51 AM |
#59 |
| -
The bulk of the middle class are getting screwed |
2hip |
Jan-12-08 02:14 AM |
#61 |
| -
They're all cribbing from each other. |
cali |
Jan-12-08 02:52 AM |
#68 |
| -
Edwards is shown to be the only candidate who can beat all the Repubs... |
Triana |
Jan-11-08 09:47 PM |
#26 |
| -
No. Not even close. |
cali |
Jan-12-08 01:53 AM |
#60 |
| -
Now tell me how the GOP will frame Obama or Hillary? |
2hip |
Jan-12-08 02:30 AM |
#63 |
| -
Of course it's largely about money and frames. duh. |
cali |
Jan-12-08 02:44 AM |
#66 |
| -
So you think the Obama/Clinton money machines can beat the GOP? |
2hip |
Jan-12-08 03:02 AM |
#69 |
| -
This is not 2004. And in 2000 Gore won. Or didn't you know that? |
cali |
Jan-12-08 03:12 AM |
#71 |
| -
Last national election GOP won - 1988. Afer that - straight loss and theft. Edwards knows |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:46 AM |
#84 |
| -
Agreed. If Obama is the Dem candidate, Huckabee will be the Repug President. |
kelligesq |
Jan-11-08 09:51 PM |
#27 |
| -
A Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can’t Win |
EVDebs |
Jan-11-08 11:07 PM |
#45 |
| -
Great links and analysis! |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 11:38 PM |
#48 |
| -
Thanks. The media bargain appears to be 'don't get specific' . Check this out... |
EVDebs |
Jan-11-08 11:47 PM |
#50 |
| -
If the Grassroots shout loud enough, the media will come |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 11:57 PM |
#53 |
| -
I was really angry at CNN today 4 not giving JE as much time as the others so this is email i sent |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:34 PM |
#101 |
| -
The Interest of the Networks' Parent Corporations Trump Even Ratings |
AndyTiedye |
Jan-15-08 08:26 PM |
#110 |
| -
So your argument for Edwards is he is electable because he is a white man? |
BrentTaylor |
Jan-11-08 09:54 PM |
#30 |
| -
No my argument for Edwards is he's the most acceptable because he's not Bushlite |
kelligesq |
Jan-11-08 10:12 PM |
#37 |
| -
How will the GOP see Obama and Clinton? |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 10:22 PM |
# |
| -
No, I think female unknown name wouldn't have a chance at all - out in first |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 02:33 AM |
#65 |
| -
How about a KNOWN female name -- like Boxer, for instance? |
2hip |
Jan-12-08 02:46 AM |
#67 |
| -
2 Hip, I added to my last post - do read pls - now onto Boxer |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:04 AM |
#70 |
| -
You seem to be coming from the JE camp |
alittlelark |
Jan-11-08 09:59 PM |
#32 |
| -
playing a little race card are you ? read the rest of my posts, jr. |
kelligesq |
Jan-11-08 10:14 PM |
#38 |
| -
Actually, |
alittlelark |
Jan-11-08 11:21 PM |
#46 |
| -
"Obvious and ugly" nonsense and repetitive attempts to bait. Silly games |
kelligesq |
Jan-11-08 11:28 PM |
#47 |
| -
Wow, I've never felt threatened enough to 'ignore' someone. |
alittlelark |
Jan-11-08 11:43 PM |
#49 |
| -
Hillary & Obama |
The River |
Jan-11-08 10:10 PM |
#36 |
| -
so we better vote for Edwards? |
Skittles |
Jan-11-08 10:22 PM |
#40 |
| -
And the new & improved 2009 GOP WH will bring you -- WHAT? |
2hip |
Jan-11-08 10:50 PM |
#44 |
| -
I refuse to pander to racists and bigots and homophobes and mysoginists |
Skittles |
Jan-12-08 06:18 AM |
#77 |
| -
They'll go for Huckabee or Bloomberg once he's in the race. |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 10:22 AM |
#89 |
| -
Interesting on news: only 16% New Yorkers would vote for Blumberg - not good news for him |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:27 PM |
#100 |
| -
Obama will probably make Colin Powell DefSec for his endorsement |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 12:03 AM |
#55 |
| -
I cant envision Powell accepting any office after what he's been through |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:33 AM |
#74 |
| -
The Economy should be topic #1 at any debate. Edwards has it locked |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 10:19 AM |
#88 |
| -
I don't care for Edwards, HRC OR Obama |
Skittles |
Jan-12-08 07:54 AM |
#85 |
| -
dont blame you, but many do not buy into those crowned by the MSM |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:24 PM |
#99 |
| -
really? |
Skittles |
Jan-12-08 08:23 PM |
#107 |
| -
Actually, it's still "It's the Economy, Stupid" and with the Fed cutting rates |
EVDebs |
Jan-11-08 11:51 PM |
#51 |
| -
Recession. Other than Bill Clinton or Robert Rubin, can you name anyone |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:38 AM |
#75 |
| -
Edwards. Period. Obama can't and Hillary can't |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 10:42 AM |
#92 |
| -
EVDebs - you're right about the big "D" word - yes it's the economy |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:50 PM |
#102 |
| -
Income redistribution is needed FAST. Too much concentrated in Bush's top 1% |
EVDebs |
Jan-13-08 02:06 PM |
#108 |
| -
Nominating Clinton is suicide for us, but Obama will be liked by both sides. |
Oregonian |
Jan-11-08 11:56 PM |
#52 |
| -
Widely despised but look at that delegate count, won't you ? |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 12:01 AM |
#54 |
| -
I know. It's so frustrating that a person who wants to take on corporations |
Oregonian |
Jan-12-08 12:27 AM |
#57 |
| -
Obama will be a much much better choice for the Republicans |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:16 AM |
#72 |
| -
Agree 100%, a Hillary nomination would GUARANTEE the Repukes retain control of the WhiteHouse |
ShadowLiberal |
Jan-12-08 12:05 AM |
#56 |
| -
Sure both sides like Obama who never met a lobbyest he didnt like including the mob |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 07:56 PM |
#104 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-12-08 01:43 AM |
#58 |
| -
And while at it, better be a Republican man, too! ("electability" comes down to that eventually) |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:31 AM |
#80 |
| -
You are right... but I don't think you really understand how a lot |
Bread and Circus |
Jan-12-08 02:24 AM |
#62 |
| -
Yeah, Well... |
Steely_Dan |
Jan-12-08 02:31 AM |
#64 |
| -
You all speak as if there's going to be a legitimate election without fixed machines - guess |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 03:28 AM |
#73 |
| -
I think we should run a dog for president, just to humiliate the Republicans. |
Perry Logan |
Jan-12-08 05:46 AM |
#76 |
| -
Then in 2009, Bush's War will be Hillary's War |
martymar64 |
Jan-12-08 12:19 PM |
#97 |
| -
I hear apolitical people say 'all I know is I hate Clinton' |
NoBorders |
Jan-12-08 07:23 AM |
#78 |
| -
the media demonized her beyond the point of logic |
Skittles |
Jan-12-08 07:55 AM |
#86 |
| -
They really created an image |
NoBorders |
Jan-12-08 08:02 AM |
#87 |
| -
Electability is about stupid! (MSM made - meaning "who we tell you to vote for") |
robbedvoter |
Jan-12-08 07:26 AM |
#79 |
| -
The three of them are electable. It's just that Obama is the best candidate |
Katzenkavalier |
Jan-12-08 10:22 AM |
#90 |
| -
Edwards would be the best President |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-08 10:25 AM |
#91 |
| -
EVDEBS - from your link - Bank Governors talking big D word |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 11:58 AM |
#93 |
| -
google Harpers Magazine + Obama to find out who Obama is.. |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 12:02 PM |
#95 |
| -
It’s about ELECTABILITY, stupid? - Not so, Bush swiped two elections, h-e-l-l-o...! |
Imagevision |
Jan-12-08 12:00 PM |
#94 |
| -
Fixed machines. And the sheeple wanted to have a beer with him n/t |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 12:04 PM |
#96 |
| -
Edwards will be out of the race on February 6th |
zulchzulu |
Jan-12-08 07:56 PM |
#103 |
| -
Thanks. I'll wait to hear it from the man himself - not wishful thinking of yours :) |
kelligesq |
Jan-12-08 08:04 PM |
#105 |
| -
and he' clean too... |
ileus |
Jan-12-08 08:08 PM |
#106 |
| -
What are you up to? Smearing all three front-running Dem candidates at once... |
Mister Ed |
Jan-13-08 02:33 PM |
#109 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread