You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: Most people don't do 'nuance', or 'get' it. You want details, it's HRC or Biden. And he's out. nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Most people don't do 'nuance', or 'get' it. You want details, it's HRC or Biden. And he's out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hillary seems to be understanding of the complexities of getting our troops out Auntie Bush  Jan-05-08 08:57 PM   #0 
  - She's kicking ass and taking names!  goldcanyonaz   Jan-05-08 08:59 PM   #1 
  - What debate are you watching?  BrentTaylor   Jan-05-08 08:59 PM   #2 
  - Would ask the same of you.  goldcanyonaz   Jan-05-08 09:01 PM   #4 
  - Same one that you are but I don't have my blinders on.  Auntie Bush   Jan-05-08 09:01 PM   #5 
     - I saw her try to attack Obama  BrentTaylor   Jan-05-08 09:06 PM   #7 
  - I truly believe she is just warming up too.  liberalnurse   Jan-05-08 09:17 PM   #17 
  - Yes sir!!!  emilyg   Jan-05-08 09:18 PM   #19 
  - "I'll get them out in 18 months"  The_Casual_Observer   Jan-05-08 09:01 PM   #3 
  - she really understands the complexity and what involves  fenriswolf   Jan-05-08 09:03 PM   #6 
  - since she was instrumental along with the rest for getting them in  roguevalley   Jan-06-08 08:56 PM   #50 
  - Hillary doesn't know shit! She is just a neocon in drag!  IndianaGreen   Jan-05-08 09:07 PM   #8 
  - Think before you post.  Auntie Bush   Jan-05-08 09:11 PM   #15 
  - I do not agree with Hillary, but I agree with you on this point /nt  still_one   Jan-05-08 09:19 PM   #20 
  - The Soviets didn't have an ocean between them and all the IED problems..  Auntie Bush   Jan-05-08 09:48 PM   #25 
  - Would you prefer to wait until our troops have to fight their way out of Iraq?  IndianaGreen   Jan-05-08 10:33 PM   #41 
     - "Because this criminal invasion of Iraq won't end pretty for us."  Auntie Bush   Jan-05-08 10:40 PM   #42 
  - Your comments are consistently sick, & you know nothing about what's going on over there. nt  mtnsnake   Jan-05-08 10:06 PM   #37 
  - Well, she sure did have any problem helping put them in that situation  still_one   Jan-05-08 09:08 PM   #9 
  - Yes, a lot of people should have done that. nt  Miss Chybil   Jan-05-08 09:10 PM   #13 
     - Agreed, especially since most of those people lived through the Viet Nam era  still_one   Jan-05-08 09:17 PM   #18 
  - How is that different than Obama? nt  heraldsqure   Jan-05-08 09:09 PM   #10 
  - Obama didn't vote for the IWR, Hillary did /nt  still_one   Jan-05-08 09:10 PM   #11 
     - Obama still funds it (nt)  bigwillq   Jan-05-08 09:10 PM   #14 
     - You don't have the votes to stop the funding, it is political suicide to vote against the funding  still_one   Jan-05-08 09:15 PM   #16 
        - And that's when of the reasons why I am NOT  bigwillq   Jan-05-08 09:37 PM   #23 
        - We all have to decide for ourseleves what means can justify the end  still_one   Jan-05-08 09:55 PM   #31 
        - "it is political suicide to vote against the funding" It was also  Auntie Bush   Jan-05-08 09:55 PM   #32 
        - NO!  indimuse   Jan-06-08 06:34 AM   #45 
     - Obama didn't have the option to vote. He also wasn't running for president  Auntie Bush   Jan-05-08 09:20 PM   #21 
        - What we know for SURE is how Clinton voted, Obama is hypothetical  still_one   Jan-05-08 09:23 PM   #22 
           - So did every single one running for office...so they shouldn't be eliminated.  Auntie Bush   Jan-05-08 09:38 PM   #24 
              - Obama never voted for the IWR, and Edwards said it was a huge mistake HE made  still_one   Jan-05-08 09:49 PM   #26 
                 - So because Edwards not only said it was wrong but also co-sponsored the bill  Auntie Bush   Jan-05-08 10:00 PM   #34 
                    - It is your right to view it that way. I view it differently, I think Edwards is more trustworthy  still_one   Jan-05-08 10:13 PM   #40 
  - Most people don't do 'nuance', or 'get' it. You want details, it's HRC or Biden. And he's out. nt  MookieWilson   Jan-05-08 09:10 PM   #12 
  - She is tempting me.  pirhana   Jan-05-08 09:51 PM   #27 
  - If she would tell it like it is, then she would also name the names of  The Backlash Cometh   Jan-05-08 09:51 PM   #28 
  - No that isn't the answer, the answer is to get rid of ALL lobbists, not just one group /nt  still_one   Jan-05-08 09:57 PM   #33 
  - I'm fair in all this. If a group has proven to be devious in their methods,  The Backlash Cometh   Jan-05-08 10:00 PM   #35 
     - All the lobbyists are devious my friend. It is legalized bribery /nt  still_one   Jan-05-08 10:03 PM   #36 
  - Why don't you ask Obama the same question?  Auntie Bush   Jan-05-08 10:11 PM   #39 
     - Obama hasn't been around long enough to know who the players are  The Backlash Cometh   Jan-06-08 06:07 AM   #43 
  - Which is fucking convenient because she helped put them there.  Raster   Jan-05-08 09:52 PM   #29 
  - That is what is ironic, and it WILL be thrown back at her in the general election  still_one   Jan-05-08 10:07 PM   #38 
  - self-delete  Raster   Jan-05-08 09:52 PM   #30 
  - Complexities? That lets the Obama people out.  Perry Logan   Jan-06-08 06:11 AM   #44 
  - ROFL: Hillary's "complexity" focused "plan"  alcibiades_mystery   Jan-06-08 07:01 AM   #49 
  - So if she understands this so well,  MadHound   Jan-06-08 06:42 AM   #46 
  - Wowie, wow, wow.  AtomicKitten   Jan-06-08 06:49 AM   #47 
  - Duh...who DOESN'T understand the co mplexities?  alcibiades_mystery   Jan-06-08 06:53 AM   #48 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC