saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-30-07 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. A question I'd like some Bloomberg insider to answer is whether he's intent on |
|
Edited on Sun Dec-30-07 10:36 PM by Old Crusoe
running regardless of whom we nominate.
It's hard to get the full measure of his intent when we don't know what it is yet.
I'd like to know exactly what is motivating him. He barely won his first term as NYC mayor, edging Mark Green by a whisker. He's got some bucks. He's got some problem-solving skills -- more and better problem-solving skills than his predecessor.
But we haven't nominated anybody yet and neither have the Pukes.
There's a lot of "If this" and "If that" questions still out there before we can make firm guesses on a potential Bloomberg impact.
|
| -If Bloomberg runs, Hillary is toast and the GOP nominee will win |
BluegrassDem |
Dec-30-07 10:29 PM |
#0 |
 -
Have you looked at the polls of Bloomberg on rasmussen? |
skipos |
Dec-30-07 10:31 PM |
#1 |
 -
Bloomberg is more progressive than Hillary!! |
BluegrassDem |
Dec-30-07 10:41 PM |
#10 |
| -
Hillary is my last choice in 08, right next to Kucinich. You don't need to convince me. |
skipos |
Dec-30-07 10:42 PM |
#13 |
| -
Why aren't the polls proving your theory? |
antiimperialist |
Dec-30-07 10:43 PM |
#14 |
 -
Or Maybe he can win the damn thing himself |
Wolsh |
Dec-30-07 10:48 PM |
#19 |
| -
can i just point one thing out. the polls with giul/hil/bloom have bloom at 11... |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 10:50 PM |
#23 |
| -
you're underestimating how many conservatives strictly vote on economic issues |
LordJFT |
Dec-30-07 11:03 PM |
#32 |
| -
hope so. thanks for cheering me up. : ). |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 11:04 PM |
#34 |
| -
Polls show that a Bloomberg candidacy would benefit Hillary |
antiimperialist |
Dec-30-07 10:32 PM |
#2 |
| -
Would you mind showing me polls citing that? Really, that made |
babylonsister |
Dec-30-07 10:36 PM |
#7 |
| -
he is friendly with her, and he seems to like her. But he thinks.. |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 10:46 PM |
#16 |
| -
Here |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Dec-30-07 10:56 PM |
#27 |
| -
Here's polls that show a Bloomberg candidacy would help Hillary |
Lasher |
Dec-30-07 11:24 PM |
#43 |
| -
It's Refreshing To See Folks Quote Polls Honestly And Not Cherry Pick |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Dec-30-07 11:53 PM |
#54 |
| -
Why thank you. |
Lasher |
Dec-31-07 12:37 AM |
#65 |
| -
i'm thinking now this may be the case. When i read comments... |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 10:33 PM |
#3 |
| -
Not all people. |
babylonsister |
Dec-30-07 10:44 PM |
#15 |
| -
but how much... |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 10:53 PM |
#25 |
| -
Huh? What does Gore have to do with anything? And yes, they are very |
babylonsister |
Dec-30-07 11:07 PM |
#35 |
| -
just has to do with... |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 11:12 PM |
#38 |
| -
Gore has not employed Mark Penn. Gore was not endorsed by |
NCevilDUer |
Dec-30-07 11:46 PM |
#49 |
| -
He Might Well Have Won Had He Employed Mr. Penn, Sir |
The Magistrate |
Dec-30-07 11:50 PM |
#52 |
| -
He did win. Without Penn. Despite Brasile. |
NCevilDUer |
Dec-31-07 12:09 AM |
#57 |
| -
Mr. Gore, Sir, Made One Very Bad Mistake |
The Magistrate |
Dec-31-07 12:22 AM |
#62 |
| -
I agree. |
seasonedblue |
Dec-31-07 01:42 AM |
#69 |
| -
Sir, you can express in three lines what I try to say in three paragraphs. |
lamprey |
Dec-31-07 01:46 AM |
#70 |
| -
ok, very true on the polls. that disgusts me. |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 11:53 PM |
#53 |
| -
Gaining power through your husbands efforts is NOT what a |
dkf |
Dec-30-07 11:21 PM |
#41 |
| -
oh riiiiiiight...she only ... |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 11:49 PM |
#51 |
| -
I went to Wikipedia to check up on your info |
dkf |
Dec-31-07 03:39 AM |
#72 |
| -
alright, i'll ... |
annie1 |
Dec-31-07 07:30 AM |
#73 |
| -
"And too many people buy into it..." |
NCevilDUer |
Dec-30-07 11:44 PM |
#46 |
| -
yeah, i know. i'm just a little frustrated... |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 11:55 PM |
#55 |
| -
because you will vote for him? lmao. nt. |
IndianaJones |
Dec-30-07 10:33 PM |
#4 |
| -
Yawn..just more rhetoric from the anti-Hillary contingent here with NO factual basis. |
journalist3072 |
Dec-30-07 10:35 PM |
#5 |
| -
A question I'd like some Bloomberg insider to answer is whether he's intent on |
Old Crusoe |
Dec-30-07 10:36 PM |
#6 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-30-07 10:38 PM |
#8 |
| -
What does him being Jewish have to do with anything? |
Wolsh |
Dec-30-07 10:51 PM |
#24 |
| -
with a live-in girlfriend! lol. she can't even be the first spouse, she'll be 'the first lady friend |
annie1 |
Dec-30-07 10:58 PM |
#28 |
| -
I don't think so. This candidacy would break against the Republicans. |
sfexpat2000 |
Dec-30-07 10:40 PM |
#9 |
| -
You Are Right, Ma'am |
The Magistrate |
Dec-30-07 11:20 PM |
#40 |
| -
You'll likely be busy tonight. Happy New Year, Your Honor. |
sfexpat2000 |
Dec-31-07 05:30 PM |
#74 |
| -
I'd consider voting for him |
TSIAS |
Dec-30-07 10:41 PM |
#11 |
| -
How can you hold onto so many straws simultaneously? |
niceypoo |
Dec-30-07 10:42 PM |
#12 |
| -
I think we'll be toast if Hillary is the nominee regardless. n/m |
BringBigDogBack |
Dec-30-07 10:47 PM |
#17 |
| -
The NY Times article suggests that Bloomberg wouldn't even run if Hillary wins the primaries |
antiimperialist |
Dec-30-07 10:47 PM |
#18 |
| -
Aieeee! That Would Give Us President Huckabee! Arrrgh!! NO! |
AndyTiedye |
Dec-30-07 10:59 PM |
#29 |
| -
Joe isn't in the loop - it's all speculation. |
lamprey |
Dec-30-07 11:04 PM |
#33 |
| -
the sky is falling nt |
msongs |
Dec-30-07 10:49 PM |
#20 |
| -
again. nt |
rucky |
Dec-30-07 11:10 PM |
#37 |
| -
If Bloomberg wins, Hillary is toast, and Blomberg has a good shot at winning |
Wolsh |
Dec-30-07 10:50 PM |
#21 |
| -
Seven Percent, Sir, Tops, If He Runs |
The Magistrate |
Dec-30-07 11:22 PM |
#42 |
| -
Where are you getting those numbers from? |
Wolsh |
Dec-30-07 11:29 PM |
#44 |
| -
Book-Mark It, Sir, And Check Back In Eleven Months |
The Magistrate |
Dec-30-07 11:46 PM |
#48 |
| -
BS. nt |
cat_girl25 |
Dec-30-07 10:50 PM |
#22 |
| -
When I was a kid there was a rumour that if HHH beat Nixon we'd have to go to school on Saturday |
Kurt_and_Hunter |
Dec-30-07 10:55 PM |
#26 |
| -
I Can't Believe Folks Think Bloomberg Can Win |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Dec-30-07 11:01 PM |
#31 |
| -
Data injection from the NYT article: |
Kurt_and_Hunter |
Dec-30-07 11:09 PM |
#36 |
| -
Kind Of Like John Anderson In 80 |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Dec-30-07 11:13 PM |
#39 |
| -
Wow. When I was a kid I 'think' I supported HHH. |
babylonsister |
Dec-30-07 11:33 PM |
#45 |
| -
That's one of the sorriest imitations of rightwing fear mongering I've ever seen. lmao |
mtnsnake |
Dec-30-07 11:00 PM |
#30 |
| -
Or Bloomberg might win. It is possible, don't believe it's not. nt |
calteacherguy |
Dec-30-07 11:45 PM |
#47 |
| -
It Is Not Possible, Sir |
The Magistrate |
Dec-30-07 11:49 PM |
#50 |
| -
Lessee, the Hillary Haters are telling us that Clinton can't be elected... |
hayu_lol |
Dec-31-07 12:06 AM |
#56 |
| -
When was it said Paul would take out your gal, for starters? |
babylonsister |
Dec-31-07 01:11 AM |
#66 |
| -
I am not so sure |
Mojorabbit |
Dec-31-07 12:21 AM |
#61 |
| -
Not to worry |
2hip |
Dec-31-07 12:10 AM |
#58 |
| -
Huh? n/t |
here_is_to_hope |
Dec-31-07 12:13 AM |
#59 |
| -
Dumb Thread - Bloomberg is not Nader |
LVZ |
Dec-31-07 12:19 AM |
#60 |
| -
According to Nader on Hardball, he'll probably run too if Edwards doesn't get the nod... |
larissa |
Dec-31-07 12:24 AM |
#63 |
| -
Nader might run as the next Harold Stassen? |
LVZ |
Dec-31-07 12:29 AM |
#64 |
| -
The Republicans Will Not Have Money To Spare For Him This Year, Sir |
The Magistrate |
Dec-31-07 02:08 AM |
#71 |
| -
Agreed |
weeve |
Dec-31-07 01:37 AM |
#67 |
| -
Carefully put down your 8-ball |
cali |
Dec-31-07 01:39 AM |
#68 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread