Usrename
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-29-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 30. Are there any photos of them with Ned Lamont? |
|
Did they ever appear publicly with him?
You are only kidding yourself. Most of us won't be fooled that easily.
Do you really think they wanted Ned Lamont to win over their old friend Joe Lieberman? Even in the general?
|
| -To all of you hillbots who claim that Bill Clinton didn't campaign for Lieberman... |
Windy |
Dec-28-07 08:17 PM |
#0 |
 -
The Clintons WILL ALWAYS throw progressives under the bus |
gaiilonfong |
Dec-28-07 08:21 PM |
#1 |
  -
I smiled when he endorsed McCain |
College Liberal |
Dec-29-07 09:12 PM |
#85 |
| -
Very interesting... Bill, Hillary, and Joementum: One Big Happy Neocon Warmongering Family |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-28-07 08:22 PM |
#2 |
| -
Word! |
bvar22 |
Dec-28-07 10:06 PM |
#13 |
| -
That's more like a thousand words! nt |
rateyes |
Dec-29-07 07:15 AM |
#24 |
| -
And they are all obscene! |
pocoloco |
Dec-29-07 10:21 AM |
#33 |
| -
A thousand four letter words. nt |
rateyes |
Dec-29-07 11:34 AM |
#38 |
| -
I need eye bleach for that three-way |
corkhead |
Dec-29-07 02:48 PM |
#53 |
| -
Wow! THAT is a telling photo! |
stlsaxman |
Dec-29-07 06:22 PM |
#65 |
| -
Is that their "girl" smiling at Bush and Lieberman as they lovingly gaze at each other? |
IndianaGreen |
Dec-30-07 01:37 PM |
#108 |
| -
How did you feel about Gore? the same way you feel about the clintons? |
annie1 |
Dec-29-07 12:54 PM |
#45 |
| -
Excuse me- but wasn't it Hillary who took "Big Dog's" time away from Gore to help her in her Senate |
stlsaxman |
Dec-29-07 06:38 PM |
#72 |
| -
got any proof? evidence? |
AJH032 |
Dec-29-07 10:45 PM |
#91 |
| -
here you go; |
stlsaxman |
Dec-29-07 11:34 PM |
#93 |
| -
This is the time to "carry on"...We souldn't have to have Hillary shoved down our throats. ..n/t |
Just-plain-Kathy |
Dec-29-07 08:26 PM |
#82 |
| -
You missed the word "primary" in your links - in general Clinton did fundraiser for Lamont |
papau |
Dec-28-07 08:24 PM |
#3 |
| -
And that means what? |
OhioBlues |
Dec-28-07 08:26 PM |
#4 |
| -
omly a few Dems thought otherwise in the primary (Maxine and a few others) |
papau |
Dec-28-07 10:35 PM |
#17 |
| -
PRIMARY - every Democrat is free to support the DEMOCRAT of his/her choice. |
TankLV |
Dec-29-07 03:31 PM |
#54 |
| -
Here's the YouTube video of Bill Clinton gushing 2006 endorsement of Lieberman at an outdoor rally: |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-28-07 08:26 PM |
#5 |
| -
I'd like to rub that in his |
zidzi |
Dec-28-07 08:36 PM |
#8 |
| -
How dare you refute them with facts! |
enough already |
Dec-28-07 08:29 PM |
#6 |
| -
That's just gross...wonder |
zidzi |
Dec-28-07 08:35 PM |
#7 |
| -
Transparent... |
SaveElmer |
Dec-28-07 08:39 PM |
#9 |
| -
So they were against Lamont before they were for him. |
cryingshame |
Dec-30-07 10:43 AM |
#103 |
| -
"Mrs. Clinton Offers to Raise Money for Lamont Campaign" ~ NYT |
mzmolly |
Dec-28-07 08:40 PM |
#10 |
| -
Lamont |
Robbins |
Dec-28-07 08:48 PM |
#11 |
| -
They have a right to support who they wish in the primary race. |
mzmolly |
Dec-28-07 08:57 PM |
#12 |
| -
Thats True! |
bvar22 |
Dec-28-07 10:15 PM |
#15 |
| -
You mean they chose a personal friend who they worked with for decades over |
mzmolly |
Dec-29-07 06:35 PM |
#71 |
| -
Then trust the Clintons to put cronyism ahead of Policy. |
bvar22 |
Dec-29-07 08:57 PM |
#84 |
| -
I suggest that Liebermans voting record sans the war is a solid one. |
mzmolly |
Dec-29-07 09:14 PM |
#86 |
| -
That argument is getting tired.. |
sendero |
Dec-29-07 09:20 PM |
#87 |
| -
The WAR HAPPENED PARTLY BECAUSE NADER SAID BUSH = GORE! |
mzmolly |
Dec-29-07 09:26 PM |
#88 |
| -
Gore .. |
sendero |
Dec-29-07 09:32 PM |
#89 |
| -
Bullsh*t! I said it in 2000, and I'll say it again. |
mzmolly |
Dec-29-07 09:34 PM |
#90 |
| -
Not "just" The WAR!!! |
bvar22 |
Dec-30-07 11:40 AM |
#104 |
| -
I didn't say it was 'just' the war. |
mzmolly |
Dec-30-07 01:16 PM |
#107 |
| -
Do you have ANY pictures of her with Ned Lamont? |
Usrename |
Dec-29-07 09:26 AM |
#29 |
| -
Ah, so now we need 'pictures' to prove support? |
mzmolly |
Dec-29-07 06:34 PM |
#70 |
| -
Yeah, if you could only find one single picture, that would bolster your argument. |
Usrename |
Dec-30-07 07:04 AM |
#96 |
| -
well, she certainly never had a problem appearing in public with Joe |
Lerkfish |
Dec-30-07 08:46 AM |
#99 |
| -
This would be hilarious if it weren't so sad. |
Usrename |
Dec-30-07 09:58 AM |
#100 |
| -
sad, or manipulative? |
Lerkfish |
Dec-30-07 10:36 AM |
#101 |
| -
And that, can be defined as textbook triangulation. Always hedge your bets |
burythehatchet |
Dec-29-07 12:45 PM |
#39 |
| -
It's about supporting the nominee, which she did. |
mzmolly |
Dec-29-07 06:52 PM |
#74 |
| -
I'd love to see someone ask her today whether she regrets her support of Joe |
burythehatchet |
Dec-29-07 07:00 PM |
#76 |
| -
That would be a good question. |
mzmolly |
Dec-29-07 07:17 PM |
#80 |
| -
Sad. |
Katzenkavalier |
Dec-28-07 10:12 PM |
#14 |
| -
They supported Lieberman in the Primary, but supported Lamont in the General n/t |
tammywammy |
Dec-28-07 10:15 PM |
#16 |
| -
God I love you Tammy! |
ronnykmarshall |
Dec-28-07 11:38 PM |
#19 |
| -
Thank you |
tammywammy |
Dec-29-07 12:54 PM |
#46 |
| -
Well I guess so as he was the nominee, but lamont clearly wasn't their first choice. n/t |
Windy |
Dec-28-07 11:49 PM |
#20 |
| -
I'm not sure about that |
tammywammy |
Dec-29-07 12:55 PM |
#47 |
| -
Because they supported Lamont in the General,,, |
MattSh |
Dec-29-07 01:32 AM |
#22 |
| -
That's how it goes |
tammywammy |
Dec-29-07 12:52 PM |
#44 |
| -
Are there any photos of them with Ned Lamont? |
Usrename |
Dec-29-07 09:29 AM |
#30 |
| -
don't confuse them with facts. n/t |
progressivebydesign |
Dec-29-07 02:29 PM |
#52 |
| -
Do you have a link? nm |
rhett o rick |
Dec-29-07 05:23 PM |
#57 |
| -
here you go |
tammywammy |
Dec-29-07 06:27 PM |
#67 |
| -
Thank you ever so much. And from an Obama supporter? nm |
rhett o rick |
Dec-29-07 06:57 PM |
#75 |
| -
disinformation is disinformation |
tammywammy |
Dec-29-07 08:44 PM |
#83 |
| -
There's support, and there's support. |
NCevilDUer |
Dec-29-07 05:29 PM |
#61 |
| -
I agree |
tammywammy |
Dec-29-07 06:30 PM |
#68 |
| -
Now lets be straight here. There is a difference in supporting |
BenDavid |
Dec-28-07 11:21 PM |
#18 |
| -
The difference is bad judgment. |
autorank |
Dec-29-07 06:32 PM |
#69 |
| -
Hmmmm I wonder how many Edwards and Obama supporters voted FOR Gore Lieberman? |
niceypoo |
Dec-29-07 12:01 AM |
#21 |
| -
Let's not forget that Gore gave us Liebermann --- ! How the hell did that happen, anyway --- ???? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-29-07 05:22 PM |
#56 |
| -
The Lieberman who ran with GORE as HIS VP choice? The one Obama supported? |
CyberPieHole |
Dec-29-07 01:45 AM |
#23 |
| -
No. That's a completely DIFFERENT Lieberman. |
Perry Logan |
Dec-29-07 07:48 AM |
#25 |
| -
Ahhh....thanks, Perry...I must be thinking of Pedro Lieberman... |
CyberPieHole |
Dec-29-07 10:19 AM |
#32 |
| -
same tool, different year. |
annie1 |
Dec-29-07 12:52 PM |
#43 |
| -
Obama cast a key procedural vote for President Bush's RW judges.A BIG Lieberman supporter |
indimuse |
Dec-29-07 08:01 AM |
#26 |
| -
If Edwards or Kucinich don't make it . .. I'm looking at a Green Party vote --- !!! |
defendandprotect |
Dec-29-07 05:24 PM |
#58 |
| -
And who could forget this? "Hillary Clinton Joins Joe Lieberman To Resurrect the Culture Wars" |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-29-07 08:08 AM |
#27 |
| -
This CT Dem volunteered for Ned Lamont's campaign and opposes Hillary, but |
Larkspur |
Dec-29-07 09:08 AM |
#28 |
| -
Yep, this was covered by ttagaris over at DKos: |
Usrename |
Dec-29-07 10:01 AM |
#31 |
| -
Absolutely |
kenfrequed |
Dec-29-07 10:35 AM |
#34 |
| -
Hillary also voted with Lieberman. |
sellitman |
Dec-29-07 10:39 AM |
#36 |
| -
That wasn't the prevailing argument. The argument was that DU'ers were claiming that of Hillary |
mtnsnake |
Dec-29-07 10:39 AM |
#35 |
| -
After you say "Hillbot," there's no reason to read further. |
aquart |
Dec-29-07 11:32 AM |
#37 |
| -
Hillbot! |
Plucketeer |
Dec-29-07 12:47 PM |
#40 |
| -
I prefer "Clintonistas" because it rhymes with "Peronistas." |
IndianaGreen |
Dec-30-07 01:42 PM |
#109 |
| -
I like Bill Clinton, but seems like I remember some saying Bill had a hand in Gore |
surfermaw |
Dec-29-07 12:49 PM |
#41 |
| -
eiw, no way. Leiberman got himself on that ticket. |
annie1 |
Dec-29-07 12:51 PM |
#42 |
| -
HOW...? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-29-07 05:26 PM |
#60 |
| -
Decided I had to sign in just to comment on this thread.... |
windbreeze |
Dec-29-07 01:13 PM |
#48 |
| -
Hillary is as dangerous as Bush is!!! |
Nimrod2005 |
Dec-29-07 01:20 PM |
#49 |
| -
Yeah right. Do you even read what you write? n/t |
progressivebydesign |
Dec-29-07 02:28 PM |
#51 |
| -
"Hillbots"? Isn't that considered name-calling worthy of a freeper? |
progressivebydesign |
Dec-29-07 02:27 PM |
#50 |
| -
Rignt! "Hillbots" is completely uncalled for. |
NCevilDUer |
Dec-29-07 07:13 PM |
#78 |
| -
Watch the whine when the Hillbots reply in kind. |
desi |
Dec-29-07 07:55 PM |
#81 |
| -
"looney left" |
Lerkfish |
Dec-30-07 10:37 AM |
#102 |
| -
Rec #45 |
Leo 9 |
Dec-29-07 04:59 PM |
#55 |
| -
How about a Clinton/Lieberman ticket?? nm |
rhett o rick |
Dec-29-07 05:25 PM |
#59 |
| -
I do remember that Lieberman used to be a fairly good liberal. This... |
hayu_lol |
Dec-29-07 05:39 PM |
#62 |
| -
Expect it if she wins the nomination |
Lerkfish |
Dec-29-07 05:55 PM |
#63 |
| -
I'm not interested in going broke. nt |
cat_girl25 |
Dec-29-07 06:26 PM |
#66 |
| -
don't worry, if she wins the nomination and picks lieberman as veep |
Lerkfish |
Dec-30-07 08:45 AM |
#98 |
| -
what other team could ensure wars and more rumors of wars? nt |
Whisp |
Dec-29-07 06:41 PM |
#73 |
| -
clinton leiberman |
mdmc |
Dec-29-07 05:57 PM |
#64 |
| -
LOL!!! |
bvar22 |
Dec-30-07 11:50 AM |
#105 |
| -
If Obama wins, let's just hope he doesn't pick McClurkin if Lieberman refuses to run as his VP |
mtnsnake |
Dec-29-07 07:08 PM |
#77 |
| -
CLENIS!!!! |
no name no slogan |
Dec-29-07 07:14 PM |
#79 |
| -
BO BENIS!!! |
mzmolly |
Dec-29-07 10:55 PM |
#92 |
| -
Banana Fanna Fo Fenis!!! |
stlsaxman |
Dec-29-07 11:55 PM |
#94 |
| -
Darn |
mzmolly |
Dec-30-07 01:13 PM |
#106 |
| -
ooops |
stlsaxman |
Dec-29-07 11:56 PM |
#95 |
| -
Obama endorsed him also. So whats your point? |
William769 |
Dec-30-07 07:09 AM |
#97 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread