You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Quite frankly [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Quite frankly
I don't see any event anywhere altering who I think the nominee should be. We should be supporting the candidate we honestly think is the best possible one. And I recognize that there are strong differences of opinion about the very candidates and who in the end we should nominate, but as for me, something like the assassination of Bhutto does not change my opinion of Hillary. Nor of Obama. Nor of Edwards. Nor of Kucinich. Nor of Richardson. And with apologies to whoever I've left out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Does the tragic assassination of Bhutto mean we should nominate Hillary, as her supporters claim? jefferson_dem  Dec-27-07 03:32 PM   #0 
  - But that is what the HillShills are saying! n/t  gaiilonfong   Dec-27-07 03:33 PM   #1 
  - "HillShills "? And what are the BO Sniffers saying?  durrrty libby   Dec-27-07 03:36 PM   #6 
  - It seems the Dems  Turbineguy   Dec-27-07 03:34 PM   #2 
  - Bow to the inevitability, Jefferson. Fall in line.  Nailzberg   Dec-27-07 03:35 PM   #3 
  - I think it means that we all need to consider our candidates in the context of the situation  ElizabethDC   Dec-27-07 03:35 PM   #4 
  - That's totally reasonable, ElizabethDC. Thanks!  jefferson_dem   Dec-27-07 03:36 PM   # 
  - I think we should listen to Joe Biden on his analysis on Hardball at 5...n/t  monmouth   Dec-27-07 03:36 PM   #5 
  - No, I am saying is you don't blame your opponent for a political  BenDavid   Dec-27-07 03:38 PM   #7 
  - Right On BenDavid  durrrty libby   Dec-27-07 03:42 PM   #9 
  - When AIPAC Neo-Cons like Clinton apologize for pushing the war in Iraq  gaiilonfong   Dec-27-07 03:44 PM   #10 
  - I can't believe the Obamabots are still trying to defend the INDEFENSIBLE!  TankLV   Dec-27-07 04:30 PM   #14 
  - I think he voted "present" - too afraid to leave a voting trail, as usual...  TankLV   Dec-27-07 04:29 PM   #13 
  - That's a bunch of horseshit  eleny   Dec-27-07 03:38 PM   #8 
  - Quite frankly  SheilaT   Dec-27-07 03:45 PM   #11 
  - No - but it sure winnos out those that you SHOULDN'T vote for - like OBAMA...  TankLV   Dec-27-07 04:28 PM   #12 
  - No, but we shouldn't nominate an inexperienced candidate like Obama either.  Carrieyazel   Dec-27-07 04:44 PM   #15 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC